Psychopathology - abnormality Flashcards
4 ways to define abnormality
Statistical infrequency, deviation from social norms, failure to function adequately, deviation from ideal mental health
Statistical infrequency
Falls out of the typical/average range
Limitations of statistical infrequency
Inflexible (illogical cut off points - 2.5%)
Behaviour can occur frequently (i.e depression - 25%)
Culture (cultural differences)
Characteristics can be positive (i.e IQ > 130 not considered abnormal when low scores are)
Strength of statistical infrequency
Objective (mathematical nature -> no bias)
Representative (whole picture & population)
Useful (used in clinical practice - formal diagnoses & assessing symptom severity)
Benefits vs problems (benefit from abnormal classification i.e. low IQ -> access support services)
Deviation from social norms
Violation of approved/accepted behaviour
Limitations of DFSN
Change over time (legislation changes norms i.e. homosexuality 70s was a mental illness)
Cultural differences (variation of behaviours across cultures -> unclear what is abnormal)
Ethnic differences (behaviour acceptable in some communities but not whole cultures -> lack of understanding)
Sense of ‘rightness’ (society believing it is right and everyone else is wrong)
Strengths of DfSN
Flexibility (dependent on age & situation)
Helps society (adherence to norms means society is ordered & predictable)
Useful (used within clinical practice & can be defining characteristic of disorders)
Failure to function adequately
Unable to do everyday things & lead a normal life
Limitations of FtFA
Too focused on individual (not a problem for the individual but for people around them)
Doesn’t stop functioning (focus on how they’re coping leads to missing abnormal behaviour -> may appear fine through fitting into society but have distorted thinking)
Everyday life varies (ability to cope depends on what everyday life is - varied across cultures - which leads to subjective definition
Strengths of FtFA
Suggests free will (focused on individual’s perspective -> deem themself as abnormal and receive help)
Operationalised (GAF scale measuring -> objective decision about behaviour)
Falsifiable (Can be seen by others -> others can intervene and help the individual)
Practical applications (people seek help when symptoms are most severe -> help in targeting treatments and services)
Deviation from ideal mental health
Absence of factors that indicate psychological well-being (Jahoda 1958)
Limitations of DfIMH
Feasibility (Jahoda’s critera makes normality impossible -> majority of population would be abnormal by this definition)
Ethnocentrism (autonomy criteria makes collectivist cultures appear abnormal, non-western cultures would also appear abnormal by the criteria -> not global)
Subjectivity (vague criteria -> difficult to measure)
Strengths of DfIMH
Positive (focuses on what is helpful & desirable for individual)
Useful (allows for clear goals to be set & focused on to achieve normality)
Comprehensive definition (provides a checklist to compare ourselves against & discuss issues with psychological professionals)