Psychopathology Flashcards
What are the four definitions of abnormality?
The four definitions of abnormality are:
- Deviation from social norms
- Statistical Infrequency
- Failure to Function Adequately
- Deviation from Ideal Mental Health
What is Deviation from Social Norms?
Deviation from Social Norms is a definition of abnormality.
This refers to the idea of deviating from the unwritten rules of how people ‘ought to behave’. People may be failing to meet generally accepted moral and ethical norms.
What are 2 strengths and 3 weaknesses of Deviation from Social Norms as a definition of abnormality?
Strengths:
- Gives a clear distinction between what is normal and what is not normal
- Real life applications, such as in the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder or schizophrenia
Weaknesses
- Cultural Relativism, as social norms are defined by our culture - behaviours may be normal in one culture and abnormal in another.
- Context Sensitivity, for example, it is normal to see someone naked on a beach but not in a classroom - there is a distinction between abnormality and normality.
- Time Sensitive, abnormality cannot be judged over large time periods, for example, homosexuality was not socially acceptable 50 years ago but it is now.
What is Statisitical Infrequency?
Statistical Infrequency is a definition of abnormality.
This refers to the idea that abnormal behaviours are categorised as those that do not fit in the norm - when an individual has an uncommon characteristic, they are abnormal.
What are 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses of Statistical Infrequency as a definition of abnormality?
Strengths:
- Real life applications: it allows for the measurement of the severity of different symptoms (for example with IQ)
- Objective: this definition of abnormality is based on fact, there is no bias as it is based on statistics.
Weaknesses:
- Unusual Characteristics can be Positive: just because a behaviour is uncommon doesn’t mean it requires treatment (such as above average intelligence).
- Subjectivity - the cutoff point for what is considered to be statistically rare is subjective, for example, defining abnormality as <70 IQ means that people with an IQ of 70 do not get support.
What is Failure to Function Adequately?
What are the 5 ways Rosenham and Seligman (1989) propose you can identify this?
Failure to Function Adequately is a definition of abnormality.
Under this definition, someone is proposed as abnormal if they cannot cope in their daily lives.
Rosenham and Seligman (1989) stated that a person is failing to function adequately if they show:
- Maldaptive behaviour (behaviour that goes against long term interests, such as self-harm)
- Personal anguish (anxiety/distress)
- Observer discomfort (causes distress to those around them)
- Irrationality (unpredictable)
- Unconventionality (behaviour isn’t matched by society)
What are 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses of Failure to Function Adequately as a definition of abnormality?
Strengths:
Patient’s Perspective - FFA attemps to include the thoughts and feelings of the person experiencing the issue, unlike other definitions.
Measurable through the GAF (General Assessment of Functioning) scale, allowing for the extent of the failure to function to be measurable. Therefore, the decision on whether a behaviour is abnormal or not can be made in an objective way.
Weaknesses:
- This definition only includes those who cannot cope - others, like psychopaths, can be seen as abnormal, however, they function in society fine in ways that benefit them.
- Clinician’s opinion - It is related to the persons’ personal and subjective experience, therefore judgement may be biased, and two observers may not agree on whether someone is managing.
What is Deviation from Ideal Mental Health?
What are the 6 criteria for Ideal Mental Health?
Deviation from Ideal Mental Health is a definition of abnormality.
Jahoda (1958) states that normality is positive mental health, and therefore abnormality is a deviation from this ideal mental health.
She argues that to show ideal mental health, one must:
- show environmental mastery (the ability to adapt in new situations)
- show autonomy (independence)
- show resistance to stress
- show self-actualisation (motivation to reach their goals)
- have a positive attitude towards themselves
- have an accurate perception of reality.
What are 2 strengths and 3 weaknesses of Deviation from Ideal Mental Health as a definition of abnormality?
Strengths
It is comprehensive - Covers a broad range of criteria for ideal mental health.
Achievement of Goals - Allows for goals to be set and focused on in order to achieve good mental health, allowing the individual to be aspirational.
Weaknesses:
All can’t be achieved - According to this criteria, everyone is abnormal to some degree.
Cultural relativism - some of these criteria are culturally relative, such as self-actualisation
Subjectivity - some of these criteria are difficult to measure. How do we know if someone has a high self esteem
What are the 3 behavioural characteristics of phobias?
Panic - a reaction to the phobic stimulus. This may include crying, screaming or running away.
Avoidance - attempting to not come into contact with the phobic stimulus.
Endurance - an alternative to avoidance, where the individual suffers in the presence of the phobic stimulus, experiencing high levels of anxiety.
What are the 3 emotional characteristics of phobias?
Anxiety - stopping someone from feeling relaxed or any positive emotion.
Fear - an immediate and unpleasant response when we think about or encounter our phobic stimulus.
Unreasonable emotional response - the emotional response experienced in relation to phobic material will go beyond what is reasonable.
What are the 3 cognitive characteristics of phobias?
Selective attention - It is difficult to look away from the phobic stimulus if one can see it.
Irrational beliefs - an exaggerated belief in the harm the phobia can give to you.
Cognitive Distortions - the individual’s perception of the phobia may be distorted and therefore misrepresented compared to reality.
What is the two-process model?
Howard Mowrer’s (1960) two-process model states that phobias are acquired through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning.
What is classical conditioning?
Classical Conditioning is a part of the two-process model. It is an explanation for how phobias are developed.
In Classical Conditioning, when a neutral stimulus is paired with an unconditioned stimulus, an unconditioned response is given. Eventually, this unconditioned response is associated with the neutral stimulus
Therefore, a phobia happens when the phobic stimulus is the conditioned stimulus which causes a fear response.
An example of classical conditioning is:
- Food would cause a dog to salivate
- A bell would trigger no response in a dog
- When food was shown alongside ringing a bell, the dog would salivate.
- Eventually, the bell ringing without food would cause a dog to salivate.
What is operant conditioning?
Operant Conditioning is a part of the two-process model. It is an explanation for how phobias are maintained.
In Operant Conditioning, there are two types of rewards:
- Positive Reinforcement - a behaviour is carried out to receive a reward.
- Negative Reinforcement - a behaviour is carried out to avoid a negative consequence.
Both of these types encourage repetition of the behaviour.
When a phobic stimulus is avoided, fear and anxiety are also avoided, therefore, avoidance is an example of negative reinforcement.
What research evidence is there to support classical conditioning?
What are 2 flaws with this study?
Watson and Raynor (1920) classically conditioned an 11-month old child known as Little Albert. They did this by pairing a white rat with a loud noise which scared him. Eventually, Albert begin to associate the fear of the loud noise with the white rat, even when it was on its own.
- This study is associated with ethical issues. Since Albert was a baby, he could not consent. Furthermore, the study came with the risk of long-term harm for Albert, and a phobia of rats was given to him despite this not being his natural experience.
- Little Albert is a single case study, so we cannot generalise - we cannot be certain that all people can develop a phobia the same way Little Albert did.