psychological explanations: psychodynamic Flashcards
what did blackburn (1993) argue?
if the superego is somehow deficient or inadequate then offending behaviour is inevitable because the id is given free rein and not properly controlled
what are the three types of inadequate superego?
- weak superego
- deviant superego
- over-harsh superego
weak superego: formation and link to offending behaviour
- if the same-gender parent is absent during the phallic stage, a child cannot internalise a fully-formed superego as there is no opportunity for identification
- this would make immoral or offending behaviour more likely
deviant superego: formation and link to offending behaviour
- if the superego that a child internalises has immoral or deivant values this would lead to offending behaviour
- eg. a boy who is raised by a criminal father is not likely to associate guilt with wrongdoing
over-harsh superego: formation and link to offending behaviour
- a healthy superego is based on identification with a parent who has firm rules but forgives transgressions
- an overly harsh parenting style leads to a child with an over-harsh superego who is crippled by guilt and anxiety
- this may (unconsciously) drive the individual to perform criminal acts to satisfy the superego’s overwhelming need for punishment
describe the role of emotion in the psychodynamic approach
- an inadequate superego allows primitive emotional demands to become uppermost in guiding moral behaviour
- PA acknowledges the role of anxiety and guilt in the development of offending behaviour
- this means that lack of guilt is important in understanding offending behaviour as in the case of maternal deprivation
theory of maternal deprivation in relation to offending behaviour
- bowlby (1944) argued that the ability to form meaningful relationships in adulthood was dependent upon the child forming a warm, continunous relationship with a mother-figure
- failure to establish such a relationship during the first few years of life means a child is likely to experience a number of damaging and irreversible consequences in later life
what is the result of maternal deprivation?
- development of affectionless psychopathy
- lack of guilt, empathy and feeling for others
- such maternally deprived individuals are likely to engage in acts of delinquency and cannot develop close relationships with others
44 juvenile thieves (bowlby 1944)
- through interviews with the thieves and their families, 14 of the sample he studied showed personality and behavioural characteristics that oculd be classified a AP
- 12/14 had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers during infancy, particularly in the first 2 years of their lives
- in the non-offender group, only 2 had experienced similar early separation
- bowlby concluded that the effects of MD had caused affectionless and delinquent behaviour among the juvenile thieves
evaluation: reserach support for link between offending and the superego (goreta 1991)
- conducted a freudian-style analysis of 10 offenders referred for psychiatric treatment
- in all those assessed, disturbances in superego formation were diagnosed
- each offender experienced unconscious feelings on guilt and the need for self-punishment
- goreta explained this as a consequence of an over-harsh superego
- the need for punishment manigested itself as a desire to commit acts of wrongdoing and offend
- this evidence seems to support the role of psychic conflicts and an over-harsh superego as a basis for offending
evaluation: the central principles of the inadequate superego theory are not supported
- if this theory were correct we would expect harsh, punitive parents to raise children who constantly experience feelings of guilt and anxiety but evidence suggests the opposite is true
- parents who rely on harsher forms of discipline tend to raise children who are rebellious and rarely express feelings of guilt or self-criticism (kochanska et al. 2001)
- this questions the relationship between a strong, punitive internal parent and excessive feelings of guilt within the child
evaluation: freudian theory is gender-bias
- an implicit assumption in freud’s theory is that girls develop a weaker superego than boys as identification with the same-gender parent is not as strong
- this is because girls do not experience the intense emotions associated with castration anxiety so are under less pressure to identify with their mothers than boys are with their fathers
- therefore, according to freud, their superego, and consequently their sense of morality, is less fully realised
- this should mean that women are more prone to offending behaviour than men
- rates of imprisonment shows that the opposite is more likely to be true
- in the UK, 20 times more men are in prison than women
- due to alpha bias, freud’s theory may not be appropriate as an explanation for offending behaviour
evaluation: gender bias evidence (hoffman 1975)
- in a study where children were required to resist temptation, they found hardly any evidence of gender differences
- when there was, young girls tended to be more moral than young boys
evaluation: bowlby’s theory is only based on an association between maternal deprivation and offending (lewis 1954)
- analysed data drawn from interviews with 500 young people
- found that maternal deprivation was a poor predictor of future offending and the ability to form close relationships in adolescence
- even if there is a link between children who have experienced frequent or prolonged separation from their mothers and offending in later life, this is not necessarily a causal relationship
- there are other reasons for this apparent link eg. maternal deprivation may be due to growing up in poverty
- this suggests MD may be one of the reasons for later offending behaviour but not the only reason
evaluation: contribution
- psychodynamic explanations were some of the first to link early experience in childhood to moral behaviour and offending
- this is now regarded as common sense in contemporary criminology
- they also drew attention to the emotional basis of offending, which is largely ignored by other explanations
evaluation: lack of scientific rigour
- the many unconscious concepts in psychodynamic theory are not open to empirical testing
- in the absence of supporting evidence, arguments such as the inadequate superego can only be judged on their face value rather than their scientific worth