biological explanations: neural Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what do neural explanations suggest?

A
  • there may be neural differences in the brains of offenders and non-offenders
  • behavour (and its disorders) can be explained in terms of (dys)functions of the brain and nervous system
  • includes brain sturctures such as the PFC and neurotransmitters such as serotnin and dopamine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

neural explanations and antisocial personality disorder (APD)

A
  • much of evidence in this area involves individuals diagnosed with this condition
  • associated with reduced emotional responses, a lack of empathy for the ffelings of others
  • conditions that characterises many convicted offenders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

prefrontal cortex and APD (raine et al. 2000)

A
  • conducted many studies of the APD brain
  • reported that there are several dozen brain-imaging studies demonstrating that individuals with antisocial personalities have reduced activity in the PFC
  • part of brain that regulates emotional behaviour
  • found an 11% reduction in the volume of grey matter in the PFC of people with APD compared to controls
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what does recent research suggest about offenders with APD?

A

they can experience empathy but they do so more sporadically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

mirror neurones (keysers 2011)

A
  • empathy reaction (controlled by mirror neurons in the brain) was only activated when offenders were asked to empathise (with a person depicted on film experiencing pain)
  • this suggests that APD individuals are not completely without empathy, but may have a neural ‘switch’ that can be turned on and off, unlike the ‘normal’ brain which has the empathy switch permanently on
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluation: support for link between crime and frontal lobe (kandel and freed 1989)

A
  • reviewed evidence of frontal lobe damage (including PFC) and antisocial behaviour
  • people with such damage tended to show impulsive behaviour, emotional instability and an inability to learn from their mistakes
  • frontal lobe is associated with planning behaviour
  • this supports the idea that brain damage may be a causal factor in offending behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

evaluation: link between neural diffferences and APD may be complex

A
  • farrington et al. (2006) studied a group of men who scored high of APD
  • these individuals had experienced various risk factors during childhood, such as being raised by a convicted parents and being physically neglected
  • these early childhood experiences caused APD and some neural differences associated with it, such as reduced activity in the frontal lobe due to trauma (rauch et al. 2006)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

evaluation: biological determinism and the justice system

A
  • biological approach suggests that a person should not be held responsible for their crime
  • however, our justice system is based on the notion that we all have responsibility for our actions
  • only in extreme circumstances (eg. mental disorder) is an individual judged to lack responsibility
  • the identification of possible biological precursors to crime complicates this principle
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly