PSYC-ch7 - stereotyping, prejudice, discrimination Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 perspectives that explain biases/stereotypes/prejudices?

A

Economic perspective
Motivational Perspective
Cognitive Perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define stereotype

A

A belief that certain attributes are characteristic of members of a particular group

A way to categorise people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Prejudice

A

An attitude or affective/emotional response toward a group and its individual members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Discrimination

A

Favourable/unfavourable treatment of individuals based on their membership in a group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can you have discrimination without prejudice? Or vice versa?

A

Yes and Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Modern Racism

A

Prejudice directed at racial groups that exist in tandem with the rejection of explicitly racial beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define benevolent sexism

A

A chivalrous ideology marked by protectiveness/affection toward women who embrace conventional roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define hostile sexism

What other kind of sexism does it go in tandem with?

A

A dislike for non-traditional women

Coexists with benevolent sexism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happens when women in STEM are treated in a paternalistic manner (benevolent sexism) before cognitive tests? Why?

A

They do worse because of the self-doubts that arose from the treatment they received.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name some explicit measures of attitude.

What is the general drawback of explicit manners?

A

Surveys with a list of traits asking you to associate members with traits

Self-report questionnaires

They only show explicit prejudices, not implicit ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name the 2 implicit measures of attitude

A

IATs (implicit association tests)
Priming procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the IATs

A

IATs: you quickly associate pictures into categories.

Faster response = more automatic, strong, stereotypical response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Are IATs accurate?

A

They are correelated with brain activity

They are good at predicting race relations if the IAT was specific to the scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain priming procedures for the measurement of implicit prejudices

A

Show pictures and then ask you to tell me if the word is real or not.

If I show you a chinese face you will recognise the words math and communism and doctor faster than flower and chilli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Priming

A

the presentation of information designed to activate a concept and hence make it accessible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is AMP?

A

Affect Misattribution procedure

Measures how people evaluate a stimulus after a given prime

e.g. show you chinese face then ask you to rate a random object. hate chinese => rate random object lower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Realistic group conflict theory

A

A theory that group conflict, prejudice, and discrimination are likely to arise over competition between groups for limited resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

ethnocentrism

A

Glorifying one’s own group while vilifying other groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Superordinate goal

A

A goal that transcends the interests of any one group & that can be achieved more readily by group cooperation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

In the Robbers Cave experiment, what un/successfully reduced hostility between the groups

A

Having them simply spend time together did not reduce hostility

Having them work towards superordinate goals reduced tension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Conclusion of Robbers Cave experiment? (5)

A
  1. Neither difference in background nor appearance, nor a prior history of conflict are necessary to develop intergroup hostility
  2. All that’s required to create hostility is 2 groups in competition
  3. Competition against outsiders promotes group cohesion
  4. Group cohesion can be attained with superordinate goals
  5. Having groups ‘hang out’ is not enough to reduce hostility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Is competition necessary for intergroup hostility to emerge?

A

No.

Intergroup hostility can develop merely because a group exists, even if you are not in competition with them.

23
Q

Minimal Group Paradigm

A

a nexperimental paradigm in which researchers create groups based on arbitrary criteria and then examine how members of ‘minimal groups’ prefer one another

24
Q

What did Tajfel show with minimal groups?

A

Participants are MORE interested in maximising the RELATIVE gain for INDIVIDUAL members of their ingroup over the outgroup.

Participants are LESS interested in maximising the TOTAL gain for the group

25
Q

Social Identity theory

A

The idea that a person’s self-concept and self-esteem derive not only from personal identity but also from the status/accomplishments of the various groups to which they belong

26
Q

What 3 behaviours do we use to boost our self-esteem, in line with social identity theory

A
  1. Boosting the status of the ingroup
  2. Basking in the reflected glory of other ingroup members’ accomplishments
  3. Denigrating outgroups
27
Q

When are people especially keen to derive self-esteem from group membership?

what theory does this reflect?

A

When they are uncertain about their own attitudes/place in the world.

social identity theory

28
Q

When do people go to great lengths to announce their affiliations with a group?

What is this called?

A

When that group is doing well and/or they are insecure

Basking in reflected glory

29
Q

When are we more likely to stereotype?

Why?

A

When we are
-cognitively strained
-tired
-drunk
-mentally incapacitated

They are mental shortcuts

30
Q

Illusory correlation

A

People sometimes ‘see’ correlations b/w things that aren’t related

31
Q

Paired distinctiveness

A

The pairing of two distinctive events that stand out even more because they occur together.

e.g. when minorities commit violent crimes.

32
Q

If I talk 75% about group A and 25% about group B, and talk an equal ratio of 70% good and 30% bad about both, what will you remember?

A

group B bad sentiments.

33
Q

If I am a minority, are you more likely to generalise my behaviour if it is consistent with the stereotype, or inconsistent?

A

People are more likely to generalise behaviours that they already think are typical of group members.

34
Q

How do self-fulfilling prophecies work with race relations?

A

People act toward members of certain groups in ways that encourage the very behaviour that they expect to see from those people.

35
Q

What happens when someone encounters evidence that challenges the stereotype?

What phenomenon do they use?

A

They explain it away as an exception.

They use subtyping: explaining away exceptions to a stereotype by creating a subcategory of the stereotyped group that is exempt from that trait.

36
Q

If I like you, and you do something good, what level of abstraction will I use to describe it?

A

I will use a high level of abstraction (meaningful, broad terms)

37
Q

If I like you and you do something bad, what level of abstraction will I use to describe it?

A

Low levels of abstraction (he threw the paper on the ground, very detailed, rather than broad, he littered)

38
Q

If I don’t like you and you do something bad, what level of abstraction will I use to describe it?

A

High level of abstraction

39
Q

If I don’t like you and you do something good, what level of abstraction will I use to describe it?

A

Low level (detailed, he lifted the person, rather than broad, he helped the person)

40
Q

Outgroup homogeneity effect

A

The tendency for people to assume that within-group similarity is much stronger for outgroups than for ingroups

(they are all the same. my group is diverse)

41
Q

Own-race Identification bias

A

The tendency for people to be better able to recognize and distinguish faces from their own race than from others.

A type of outgroup homogeneity

42
Q

Does exposure to scenarios simulating deciding whether or not to shoot armed/unarmed black men change bias?

A

it reduces the tendency to shoot unarmed black men, but does not change the difference in reaction time in shooting black men over white men

43
Q

What are the most effective ways to reduce individual prejudice? (2)

A
  1. Convince people that prevailing norms favour outgroup tolerance
  2. Cognitive/emotional training, namely perspective taking
44
Q

Perspective taking

A

Asking the subject to envision themselves in the shoes of an outgroup member.

45
Q

Allport’s Contact Hypothesis

A

The proposition that prejudice can be reduced by putting members of different groups in frequent contact with one another

46
Q

What conditions are needed for contact hypothesis to work?

A

-groups need to have equal status
-groups must have shared goal (superordinate)
-community’s social norms must support intergroup contact
-intergroup contact should encourage 1-on-1 interactions

47
Q

What 3 things happen when groups with a history of animosity have the conditions for contact hypothesis?

A
  1. personalisation: people begin to see outgroup members as individuals
  2. A person’s positive feelings for particular outgroup members may generalise to the group (IF they do not subtype the individual)
  3. positive intergroup sentiments are formed if groups come to share a common identity
48
Q

What are the 2 diversity ideologies

A

Multiculturalism and Colour-blindness

49
Q

What is the main reason colour-blindness fails?

A

White people use mental effort to not address black people’s race -> end up cognitively taxed -> make more negative nonverbal expressions of prejudice

50
Q

Does multiculturalism cause race essentialism? Whats that?

A

It can

Race essentialism: The idea that racial-group differences are biologically based & immutable

51
Q

Minority spotlight effect

A

Where minority-group identity becomes uncomfortably salient

Can be caused by multiculturalism

52
Q

Identity Denial

A

When people from minorities feel precluded from embracing other group identities.

Can be caused by multiculturalism

53
Q

When is multiculturalism most successful?

A

When it is framed in an all-inclusive manner so as to not threaten majority-group members.