PSY343 - 7. Common Factors Flashcards

1
Q

What happens in psychotherapy that helps patients improve their functioning, reduce their symptoms, + enjoy happier + more meaningful lives?

A

5 umbrella approaches
expectations + beliefs
therapeutic relationship - most robust common predictor of outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

Psychotherapy integration movement of conceptual + clinical rapprochement (presumption of harmonous relationship) that includes efforts to:
Integrate diverse therapy models + techniques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

Better understand + improve psychotherapy by considering perspective of different approaches
multiple approaches are effective but in commonalities that can help us understand what makes therapy work
what’s helpful is shared across treatment models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

1930s/40s: Rosenzweig’s (1936) Dodo Bird Verdict: all psychological treatments, regardless of their specific components, produce equivalent outcomes due to common factors shared across treatments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

1950s/60s/70s – Efforts to integrate versions of psychoanalysis + learning theory; attempts towards methodological integration
bring behavioural therapy info into psychoananalysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

1980s – Psychotherapy integration journals, research groups, textbooks (new handbooks, conferences)
scholars explore possibilities in integrating technically (treatment), theoretically, philosophically (how do i make sense of it)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

1990s – Proliferation of integrative therapies (e.g., EFT, DBT)
2000s-present – Psychotherapy integration widely accepted + increasingly popular approach; common factors emphasized more than specific therapeutic approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

History of Psychotherapy Integration

A

agreed that not a lot to be gained by comparing approaches unless looking at commonalities
RCTs are still happening

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Psychotherapy Integration

A

Multiple pathways to psychotherapy integration:
• Technical Eclecticism
• Theoretical Integration
• Assimilative Integration
• Common Factors
• 4 approaches not mutually exclusive! common factors approach focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Technical Eclecticism

A

Guided primarily by research on what specific methods have worked best with similar problems + patient characteristics
Focuses on predicting for whom interventions will work (more actuarial than theoretical)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Technical Eclecticism

A

techniques of all models without grounding in own therapists theoretical model
choosing techniques from diff approaches based on disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Technical Eclecticism

A

use procedures drawn from diff therapeutic systems without necessarily subscribing to theories that spawned them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Technical Eclecticism

A

no necessary connection betw conceptual foundations +
techniques used
toolbox
always a risk that it’s throwing best guess

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Theoretical Integration

A

Two or more therapies are integrated to create a conceptual framework that synthesizes the best elements of the therapies
theoretical models emerging from 2 focused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Theoretical Integration

A

emphasis on integrating underlying theories of psychotherapy along with techniques from each
EFT: gestalt, client-centred - own new model
DBT: Mindfulness + CBT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Theoretical Integration

A

Integration aspires to more than a simple combination; it seeks emergent theory more than sum of its parts
personality theory, psychopathology + techniques
mechanisms of change to create new framework
theoretical commonality in approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Assimilative Integration

A

firm grounding in 1 system of psychotherapy, but with willingness to selectively incorporate (assimilate) practices + view from other systems
approach combines the advantages of a single, coherent theoretical system with flexibility of broader range of technical interventions from multiple systems

18
Q

Assimilative Integration

A

For example, using a Gestalt two chair intervention within context of an otherwise CBT course of treatment
identify central position
time to time will integrate practices from other approaches
doesn’t change my theoretical model

19
Q

Common Factors

A

Commonalities more important in accounting for therapy success than unique factors that differentiate them
CBT: cognitive restructuring
more interested in what is shared among all approaches like relationship

20
Q

Common Factors

A

Comparisons of different forms of psychotherapy consistently result in insignificant differences, + contextual + relationship factors often mediate or moderate outcomes
looked at specific techniques impact, smaller variance in outcomes than common factors

21
Q

Common Factors

A

little/no substantial difference betw bona fide therapies with regard to client outcomes
important that we talk common factors in bona fide

22
Q

Common Factors

A

Bona fide therapies: treatments delivered by trained therapists, based on psychological principles, offered to psychotherapy community as viable treatments + contain specific components
effectiveness of all psychotherapies is due, in part, to factors common to all treatments

23
Q

Common Factors

A

Common Factors: elements ubiquitous in all forms of psychotherapy, or at least in several of them
Unique (or specific) Factors: Those elements of a particular psychotherapy that are assumed to be absent in other types of psychotherapy

24
Q

Common vs. Unique Factors

A

Faux-unique Variables: elements of therapy typically associated with + more frequently used in particular orientation but that also play a role in effectiveness of other approaches (Castonguay, 2011)

25
Q

Common vs. Unique Factors

A

exposure: CBT - but all talk about some approaching of issues
awareness: gestalt - not unique, but key aspect in humanistic

26
Q

Common vs. Unique Factors

A

not restricted to particular approach
Insight - central mechanism in psychoanalysis, but used in CBT
proported to be unique but actually common factors
awareness - same process different language
what matters is how you apply common factors

27
Q

Rosenzweig’s (1936) Common Factors Hypothesis

A

Different therapeutic approaches relatively equivalent in
• effectiveness across various populations + disorders;
• approaches to treatment propose widely differing
• theories of psychopathology, treatment, and change;

28
Q

Rosenzweig’s (1936) Common Factors Hypothesis

A
  • Factors common across approaches may be the most parsimonious
  • explanation for observed equivalence in efficacy
29
Q

Rosenzweig’s (1936) Common Factors Hypothesis

A

therapist with an “effective personality” using any theory of change that implements treatment with some consistency can bring about positive outcome
all share common factors in change process
what we think is working may not be the cause of change

30
Q

The Common Factors Approach (Frank & Frank, 1993; Wampold, 2001)

A

Frank (1973): All psychotherapeutic methods are elaborations and variations of age-old procedures of psychological healing that involve 3 elements: healing agent, sufferer, + healing relationship

31
Q

The Common Factors Approach (Frank & Frank, 1993; Wampold, 2001)

A

four general Common factors essential characteristics of therapy:
emotionally charged, confiding relationship - context of relationship

32
Q

The Common Factors Approach (Frank & Frank, 1993; Wampold, 2001)

A

healing setting: intentionality, therapies, purported to be healing (helps expectations)
rationale or conceptual scheme: identify process of change + understanding of problem + has to be accepted by the client
therapeutic ritual: techniques consistently applied

33
Q

Transtheoretical Approach (Prochaska & Norcross, 2014)

A

Processes of Change: activities of therapy that lead to change
create common factors approach to therapy
draws on all major therapy model based on empirical evidence

34
Q

Transtheoretical Approach (Prochaska & Norcross, 2014)

A

Consciousness raising, catharsis, self-reevaluation, environment reevaluation, self-liberation, social liberation, counterconditioning, stimulus control, contingency management, helping relationship

35
Q

Transtheoretical Approach (Prochaska & Norcross, 2014)

A

Stages of change: client’s readiness for change
Pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, termination
Levels of Change: types of problems that differ in levels of complexity

36
Q

Transtheoretical Approach (Prochaska & Norcross, 2014)

A

Symptom/situational problems, maladaptve cognitions, current interpersonal conflicts, family/systems conflicts, intrapersonal conflicts

37
Q

Transtheoretical Approach (Prochaska & Norcross, 2014)

A
represent how (process), what (levels), when (stages)
depending on change cycles: influences intervention approach
38
Q

Transtheoretical Approach (Prochaska & Norcross, 2014)

A

distinct and interrelated stages
CBT: severe problem intervention
can be applied across models

39
Q

Common Factors that Predict Therapy Outcome

A

Therapy relationship

Development of a strong therapeutic alliance most robust predictor of outcome (Norcross, 2011)

40
Q

Common Factors that Predict Therapy Outcome

A

Expectations for change
High, positive expectation predicts better therapeutic
outcome (Constantino, 2011)