Prospect theory Flashcards

1
Q

two ways of having a preference relation

A

complete: always define preference between x and y transitive: if x>y and y>z then x>z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a preference relation between goods is rational if…

A

complete or transitive preference relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is monotone

A

more is preferred to less

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is convex

A

diminishing marginal rates of substitutions (agents prefer diversification)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is independence

A

if x>y then (x,z)>(y,z)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is continuity

A

if A>B>C then there is always a p such that A and C weighted equals B (5/31 don’t rly get)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are main assumptions of expected utility theory

A

continuity independence linear in probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is linear in probability

A

V(q) = Σpiu(xi)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the other assumptions in expected utility theory

A

utility defined over final wealth rather than gains and losses, preferences are independent on the manner the prospects are described

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the puzzles of EU theory

A

framing effects (dying and saving people) loss aversion (losses loom larger than gain), utility not defined over final wealth (100k vs 50k happy 100k vs 500k sad), linear decision weights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the Allais paradox (linear decision weights)

A

A=(4000,.80) or B=(3000,1) C=(4000,0.20) or D=(3000,0.25) people prefer B to A and C to D. C&D obtained by dividing probabilities by 4. reducing probability of winning from 1 to 0.25 has a greater effect than reducing it from 0.8 to 0.2 (certainty effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does it mean that individuals are risk averse in gains and risk lovers in losses

A

diff between gain of 100 to 200 appears larger than 1100 and 1200, diff between loss of -100 and -200 appears larger than -1100 and -1200. hence v’‘(x)<0 for x>0 and v’‘(x)>0 for x<0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does risk loving in losses mean

A

in order to avoid losses you will do crazy things (irrational risk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is π(p)

A

weighting function: probability is a function of π

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

in prospect theory how is the decision weight used

A

the value of an uncertain outcome is multiplied by a decision weight π(p) which is a monotonic function of p but is not a probability (in EU just multiplied by probability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

explain mug experiment and who wrote it*

A

kahneman et al (1990), market for mugs (6 USD) some were endowed a mug some others with money to buy, median WTP=2.75 mediam WTA=5.25

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

why is mug experiment of note

A

standard assumptions imply WTA≈WTP, evidence of endowment effect: value things you own more than things you don’t. this type of loss aversion implies asymmetry in treatment of losses and foregone gains

18
Q

WTP and WTA d

A

willingness to accept: minimum compensation demanded by owner to sell willingness to pay: max price individuals want to pay for a good

19
Q

what is the disposition effect in terms of stocks

A

individuals hold stock that have lost value for too long and are eager to sell stocks that have gained value

20
Q

first field experiment of brokerage firm*

A

shefrin and statman (1985) field experiment brokerage firm investors held losing stocks median 124 days and held winners only 104 days

21
Q

what is another similar example to investors holding stocks that have lost value for too long and sell gainers

A

similar effect in housing market when house price falls the volume of sales falls as well

22
Q

Odean (1998)*

A

info from discount brokerage house 1987-1993. share of realised gains PGR=realisedgains/realisedgains+papergains (PLR opposite)(this controls for the market) PGR greater than PLR people more reluctant to realise losses than gains however in December PLR>PGR because if you have more losses you get taxed less at end of year

23
Q

why do you need paper gains as well

A

because if bull market would naturally have more winners than losers. need to look at frequency with which they sell winners and losers relative to their opportunities to sell winners and losers

24
Q

talk about cab driver paper*

A

Camerer et al. (1997), cab drivers lease cabs for fixed fee, they work long hours when there is low demand (sunny) and short hours when high demand (rainy), this is consistent with loss aversion: fix a daily target and averse to fall short standard theory says should respond positively to wage changes (work more when wage higher,(leisure cost more))

25
Q

how does the cab driver link with loss aversion

A

notion that drivers are averse to falling below a target income, almost consistent with loss aversion

26
Q

why study NYC cabs

A

exogenous wage fluctuations due to weather, subway breakdowns etc, make labour supply decisions each day and have a target wage, this motivates study of their behaviour as one-day target predicts negative elasticities.

27
Q

what is prospect theory

A

when faced with simple 2 or 3 outcome lotteries, people behave as if maximising S-shaped value function that is defined on gains and losses rather than on levels of wealth

28
Q

explain shape of prospect theory value function

A

concave in domain of gains and convex in domain of losses. steeper for losses than gains, implies people are generally risk-averse. critical to value function is the reference point from which gains and losses measured, its usually the status quo but could be expectation or aspiration level

29
Q

what does certainty effect lead to from Kahneman et al (1990)

A

contributes to risk aversion in choices involving sure gains and to risk seeking in choices involving sure losses

30
Q

what is the certainty effect and which paper is it from

A

people overweight outcomes that are considered certain, relative to outcomes that are merely probable

31
Q

what is the reflection effect

A

risk aversion in the positive domain is accompanies by risk seeking in the negative domain (people willing to accept risk .8 to lose 4000 over a sure loss of 3000)

32
Q

what is the isolation effect

A

in order to simplify the choice between alternatives, people often disregard components that the alternatives share, and focus on the components that distinguish them., this produces inconsistent preferences as prospects can be decomposed in different ways leading to diff choices

33
Q

what is the key feature of prospect theory

A

carriers of value are changes in wealth or welfare, rather than final stages

34
Q

in prospect theory what happens to the value of each outcome

A

multiplied by a decision weight, decision weights are inferred from choices between prospects

35
Q

How are decision weights different to probabilities

A

decision weights measure the impact of events on the desirability of prospects, not merely the perceived likelihood of these events

36
Q

what is loss aversion

A

losses loom larger than gains, Status-quo Bias (Endowment represents the status-quo)

37
Q

PGR PLR

A

proportion of realised gains/losses

38
Q

what is the conclusion of the Odean (1998) paper

A

a large difference in the proportion of realised gains (PGR) and realised losses (PLR) indicates that investors are more willing to realise either gains or losses

39
Q

what are some properties of π

A

impossible events are discarded π(0)-0, the function is not well behaved near end points, for low probabilities π(p)>p, thus low probabilities overweighted, moderate and high probabilities underweighted and latter more pronounced than former

40
Q

what is the principle of diminishing sensitivity

A

the effect of a change diminishes with the distance to the reference point

41
Q

what does complete mean

A

Complete: it is always possible to define preferences between

good x and y

42
Q

what is transitive

A

Transitive: if x > y and y > z then x > z