Professional Responsibility Flashcards
What is the issues checklist?
5 C’s + F.O.R.
A Client Loves Fierce Counsel, Courts Feel Differently
- A-C R/ship: Formation, Scope, Assisting in violation of law
- Confidentiality (GAWID): Gnrl, Disclosure (incl org), Inadvertent disclosure, A-C Privilege, Work product doctrine
- Loyalty (GRAPID): Gnrl, Potential COIs, Actual COIs, Rep despite COIs, Disclosure(CA), Imputed, Govt Ls
- Financial Responsibility: Fee A/ments, Retainer, Unreas/Uncon, Contingent, Disputes, Referral, Splitting, Advances & Loans, 3P Payor
- Communication, Competence, Diligence:
- Candor: 3Ps (Advertising, Mail, Solicitation), Court
- Fairness: Comms with adversaries, rep’d parties, press; to client: business trans, Malpractice, Gifts, Sex,
-
Decorum: Comms with judge, Use of false evidence
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Publication Rights Contract
- Serving in Legal Services Organization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- 3P Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Sexual Relations
- Confidentiality: (3) Duty, A-C Priv, W-P Doctrine
- Communicate
- Competence: (2) Gnrl, Diligence
- Cash
-
Fees: (4 - FFRUC)
- Fee Agreements (Non-Contingent)
- Unreas / Uncon
- Contingent
- Fee Splitting
- Referral
- Fee Agreements (Non-Contingent)
-
Other Duties
-
Profession (9 - )
- No Duty to Accept Representation
- Duty to Reject
- Duty to Withdraw
- Duty as Adviser
- Duties of Prosecutors
- Duty of Dignity and Decorum
- Duty to Expedite Cases
- Violate Court Rule or Order
- Discovery Abuse
- Third Party’s
-
Adversary (3)
- Threatening Disciplinary Charges (CA only)
- Court: Candor and Fairness
-
Profession (9 - )
8. Regulatory Controls
- Unauthorized Practice of Law
- Duty Not to Go into a Business with a Non-Lawyer
- Law-Related Services
- Multi-Jx Practice
- Reporting Misconduct
- Subordinate Lawyers
- Responsibilities of Partners, Managers & Supervisory Ls
- A-C Relationship
- Duty of Loyalty (17)
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- Counseling C to Act
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publication Rights Contract
A-C Relationship
Formation:
Scope: Gnrly, a C controls the objec of rep, & makes substantive decisions (incl. whether to accept a settlement offer, plead guilty, testify, or waive a jury trial in criminal matters). The L controls the means (tactical decisions) to accomplish those objectives, BUT mst consult w/ C as to means by which objectives are pursued.
Assisting in violation of law: Cannot counsel C to commit C,F or other violation. H/e can discuss the consequences.
- Lawyer-Client R/ship - Scope Generally, a C controls…
-
Duty of Loyalty (17)
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publication Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
A L has a DoL to his C that requires the L to put the interests of his C above all other interest and to avoid any conflicts.
Conflict of Interest
- Potential Conflict of Interest A potential CoI exists…
- Actual Conflicts of Interest
- Representation Despite Conflicts
- Personal Interest Issues
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
PCOI exists whn L suspects a CC, bt rep hs nt yet been ML. A CC exists whn a rep is (1) DA to another C, or (2) ML by resp to PC/FC/3P/L’s own intrsts.
ABA = no IWC for PCOI. In CA, w/out the IWC of each C, a L may nt rep more thn 1 C in a matter in whch the C’s intrsts pot cnflict.
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts__
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
U/ ABA, L mst nt rep a C if rep is (1) DA, or (2) ML by resp to P/FC/3P/L’s own intrsts UNLESS
(a) L reas believes able to prvde c&d rep to each affected C,
(b) rep not prohib by law,
(c) rep does nt involve 2 pties on opp sdes of same lit, &
(d) each C gives ICinW.
CA rule similar to ABA rule, but does not have the “reas believes” req.
Conflicts of Interest
- Potential Conflict of Interest
- Actual Conflict of Interest
- Representation Despite Conflicts
- Personal Interest Issues
Despite actual CoI’s, a L may represent a C if
- L reas bel able to prvde comp n dil rep to each aff C,
- rep is not prohibited by law,
- rep does nt involve assrtion of a claim by 1C against another C rep’d by same L, AND
- each C gives IC in W.
CA law similar but does nt hve “reas believes” requirement.
[In crim case, even when all D’s waive CoI claims, the trial ct can still prohibit joint rep]. H,T
- Joint Representation
Joint Representation
- Potential CoI: Joint rep is not per se invalid, but if the L advises the trial ct of a potential CoI, and the ct refuses to appoint separate counsel, the D is entited to automatic reversal. H,T
- Actual CoI: If the D does not timely object to joint rep, the D must show (1) the L represented actual conflicting interest and (2) pj the D. H,T
Duty of Candor to the Tribunal
U/ ABA, L is prhbtd frm knowingly offering false ev. CA law req L to employ only means consistent w/ th truth, and never seek to mislead any judicial officer by a false statement of fact or law.
-
Remedial Measures
- ABA, if L knws of false test elicited frm a prsn during an adjudicative proceeding, L mst (1) take reas rem measures to remonstrate the prsn confidentially, (2) advise prsn of L’s dty of candor to tribunal, and (3) seek w/drawal or correction of false testimony.
- CA, whn a L cannot withdraw w/out pj a crim def, the L may allow client who intents to commit perjury to test in narrative w/out discosing the perjury to the ct. The L may not use the perjured test in closing argument.
II. Confidentiality
A. Duty of Confidentiality
- Exceptions
B. Attorney-Client Privilege & Waiver
C. Work Product Doctrine
D. Representation of Multiple Clients
The a-c privilege prohibits a ct or govt tribunal from compelling the revelation of conf comms b/w an A & a C if subject of the comm concerns legal advice.
The presence of a 3P will not destroy confidentiality IF the 3P is present to help further the a-c relationship.
When the Client is a Corp, the privilege covers communications between the Lawyer and a high-ranking corporate official.
Waiver - The A-C privilege exists for the benefit of the C not the L. The C is the privilege holder, & may waive the privilege. The L may assert the priivlege on the C’s behalf.
Conflict of Interest
- …
- Personal Interest Issues
- …
- Present Client Issues
-
Former Client Issues
- Former Govt Lawyer
- Former Firm Lawyer
-
Imputed Disqualification
- Imputed Disqualification
A L must not represent a C in a matter in which the (1) L participated substantially, and (2) any attorney at the former firm has confidential, material info, unless the former C gives informed, written consent. H,T
II. Confidentiality
A. Duty of Confidentiality
B. Attorney-Client Privilege
C. Work Product Doctrine
D. Representation of Multiple Clients
Material a L prepares for litigation is immune from discovery or compelled disclosures, UNLESS the opp shows a sub need and an inability to gather the material w/out undue hardship.
A L’s mental impressions or opinions are immune from discovery or compelled disclosures regardless of the opposition’s need, unless the immunity is waived.
Conflict of Interest
- Imputed Disqualification
Imputed Disqualification
If 1 L employed by a firm is unable to rep b/c of a CoI or conf issue with a former C, the disqual is imputed to the entire firm and no L in the firm may rep the C. H,T
If a Former Govt L is prohibited from rep’ing a C, the F may rep a C against the govt if (1) the FGL is screened from part, (2) not apportioned fees, and (3) prompt written notice is given to govt so govt takes preventative measures. H,T
Former C and Former Firm: If a L is prohibited from rep’ing a C based on duties to a former C and former firm ass., other firm Ls will not be precluded from representing the C if (1) disqualified L is screened from participation, (2) not apportioned fees, (3) prompt written notice is given to any affected former C, and (4) certification of compliance with these rules and the screening procedures are provided to any affected former C upon written request and termination of the screen procedures. H,T
Prsnl Intrst: If a L is prhbtd frm rep’ing a C bsd upn a prsnl intrst, other F Ls will nt be prcldd frm rep’ing th C if th prohib L’s disqual does nt mat limit th remaining F Ls’ rep of th C. H,T
Client Waiver: A C may waive an imptd disqual if (1) the L reas bel s/he will be able to prvde comp and dil rep to each affected C, (2) rep is nt prohib by law, (3) rep does nt involve assertion of a claim by one C against another C rep’d by the same L, and (4) each C gives ICinW. [CA law similar, but does not have the “reas believes” req]. H,T
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
A L should not counsel acts that may subject a C to liability w/out a GF belief that such decision is in the C’s best intrst.
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
Conflict of Interest
- …
-
Personal Interest Issues
- Lawyer as a Witness
- Property as Payment for Services
- Proprietary Interests
- Fees Collection
- Business Transaction with a Client
- Sexual Relations
- 6A - Ineffective Counsel
- Joint Representation
- Former Govt Lawyer
- Former Firm Lawyer
- Imputed Disqualification
Prop as Payment for Services: Under ABA, a L may receive prop as a payment for services, ala the payment does not involve acquiring a proprietary interest in a litigation sm. H,T
Proprietary Interest: Under ABA, except for liens to collect a fee, a L may not obtain a proprietary interest in a litigation sm. H,T
Attorneys Fees
- …
- Referral Fees (ABA v CA)
- Expense Advances
- Loans
- 3P Payor Rule
- Property as Payment for Services
- Fees Collection
Property as Payment for Services
Under ABA, a L may receive property as a payment for services, ala the payment does not involve acquiring a proprietary interest in a litigation subject matter. H,T
Fees Collection
Under ABA/CA laws, a L may collect a fee by taking an interest-bearing promissory note, or obtaining a lien upon a potential recovery to secure the fee payment, provided the L complies with rule of prof. conduct relating to bus transaction with Cs. H,T
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
-
Personal Interest Issues
- Fees Collection
- 6A - Ineffective Counsel
- Joint Representation
- Former Govt Lawyer
- Former Firm Lawyer
- Imputed Disqualification
Fees Collection: Under ABA/CA laws, a L may collect a fee by taking an interest-bearing promissory note, or obtaining a lien upon a potential recovery to secure the fee payment, provided the L complies with the rules of prof. conduct relating to bus transcations with Cs. H,T
Business Transaction with a C: U/ ABA, a fee paid in prop hs the essential qualities of a bus transaction with a C. U/ ABA/CA laws, a L shall nt enter into a bus trans w/ a C, or knowingly acquire an o/ship, possessory, security, or other pecuniary interest adverse to a C, UNLESS:
(1) trans or acquisition and its terms are fair and reas to C and fully disclosed in writing in manner whch C shld reas have understood,
(2) C is advised in writing C may seek advice of an indep L and is given reas opp to do so,
(3) C consents in writing to the trans or acquisition and its terms. H,T
Exception - A L may enter into standard commercial trans that the C regularly provides to others. H,T
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal Services Organization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
Attorneys Fees
- …
- Referral Fees (ABA v CA)
- Expense Advances
- Loans
- 3P Payor Rule
- Property as Payment for Services
- Fees Collection
Expense Advances and Loans
- ABA does not allow Ls to make loans to C except for lit expenses whn rep’ing an indigent C, or in a contingent fee case.
- CA laws allow Ls to make loans to Cs for expenses outside of lit if the payments are repaid, not gifts, and L and C sign a written loan a/ment. H,T
U/ [B], a L may advance ct costs and other lit expenses, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome. U/ U/ [B], a L may pay ct costs and lit expenses on behalf of indigent C.
ABA does not require a written a/ment to advance expenses.
In CA, a written fee a/ment must incl. (1) basis of compensation, incl. hrly rates, statutory fees, and other charges, (2) general nature of the legal services provided, and (3) L and C contractual responsibilities. H,T
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
- Former Firm Lawyer
- Imputed Disqualification
- Imputed Disqualification
U/ ABA, a L must not rep a C in a matter in which the L participated personally and substantially as a govt officer or employee, unless the appropriate govt agency gives IWC, except as permitted by law. [In CA, a former crim prosecutor may not participate on the defense of the same case.] H,T
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
3P Payor Rule: A L must not accept compensation from a 3P for rep’ing a C unless (1) C gives I,WC, (2) 3P does not interfere with the Ls independence or the C rep, and (3) arrangement does not compromise the C’s conf info. H,T
Organizational Cs: A L mst act in the best interest of the entity.
- U/ ABA, whn L working for a org discovers misconduct tht might dmge the org, L must report tht misconduct up the chain of authority w/in the org. ABA also permits the L to report info to appropriate prsns outside org if highest authority w/in the org fails to take apprpriate action.
- In CA, such reporting w/in org is permissive, not compulsory. Reporting o/side org is not permitted; h/e if the fed law requires or allows L to report out, fed preemption means L cannot be held liable for doing so.
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
A L cannot limit liability whn entering into a L-C r/ship. The ABA allows limits on liability if C is rep’d by other independent legal counsel whn a/ment was made.
In CA, a L cannot limit malprac liability even if work is pro bono.
A L may only settle a malpractice suit with a C after providing the C with written advice to consult outside indep legal counsel and giving C opp to do so.
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
A L shall not solicit substantial gifts from Cs or draft a legal instrument (will, trust or deed) for a C that will give the L (or a prsn related to the L) a substantial gift UNLESS the L and C are related.
- Lawyer-Client R/ship
- Duty of Loyalty
- Potential Conflicts
- Actual Conflicts
- f
- Counseling C to Act / Advising/Assisting in Violaion of Law
- Use of Confidential Info to C’s Disadvantage
- Propreity Interest in SM of litigation
- Business Transactions with C’s
- Publications Rights Contract
- Expense Advances and Loans
- Serving in Legal ServicesOrganization
- Former Govt Lawyers in Private Practice
- Third Party Interference
- Limiting Malpractice Liability
- Gifts from Clients
- Close R/ship with Adversary Attorney
- Trial Counsel is Necessary Witness
- Consensual Sexual Relations
U/ [B], a L cannot during trial assert p.k. of facts in issue other than when testifying as a W or state a personal opinion at to the W’s credibility.
U/ [B], a L shall nt act as an advocate at a trial in which the L is likely to be a necessary W, unless
- the testimony relates to an uncontested issue, or
- to the nature and value of legal services, or
- disqual of the L would result in substantial C hardship.
[In CA, law is the same as ABA for jury trials w/out exception #(3). In lieu of exception (3), CA allows rep if a L obtains C’s IWC]. H,T