Criminal Law - Essay Rules Flashcards

1
Q

Battery

Aggravated Battery

A

Battery is (1) unlwfl (2) app of force (3) to anther prsn (4) that causes bodily harm, or (5) constitutes an offnsive touching.H,T

Agg Bat: By statute, Bat may carry a greater penalty whn (1) SBI, (2) use a deadly weapon, or (3) V is a child, woman, or PO.

*Ass and bat merge into murder, so insert the merger doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

BKRAM

  • Battery
  • Kidnapping
  • Rape
  • Assault
  • Murder
A

Kidnapping is the (1) unlawful confinement of another (2) involving movement or concealment in a secret place.

Aggravated if for ransom, to commit another crime, or children taken.

Rape is the (1) unlawful sexual intercourse of a female, not one’s wife, (2) w/out her consent. Modernly, gender-neutral & marriage is irrelevant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BKRAM

  • Battery
  • Kidnapping
  • Rape
  • Assault & Aggravated Assault
  • Murder
A

Ass is (1) attmptd bat, or (2) intnt to create reas app. of imm. bodily harm.

  • Attempted Battery
    • Bat is (1) U (2) app of force (3) to another p (4) tht causes bod harm, or (5) constitutes an off touching.
    • Attempt req (1) spec intent to com a crim act, (2) coup w/ a sub step taken toward comm of intndd crime, which (3) fails to be completed.

In conclusion

  • Reas App.: Ass is (1) threatning acts (2) intndd to create reas app. of imm bod harm.

Aggravated: By statute, assault with a deadly weapon or intent to rape or maim may carry a greater penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Merger Doctrine

Traditional

Modern

A

Merger Doctrine

Trad, u/ th MD, if a prsn’s cndct constitutes a fel & a misd, misd merges into fel, & prsn can be convicted of fel, bt nt misd. No merger if the crimes are the same degree. H,T

Mod, MD does nt apply, (1) unless a jx characterizes the DJ Clause prohibition against multiple punishments for the same offense as a merger of a lesser-included offense into a more signif crime, and (2) except for solicitation and attempt. H,T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • Common Law Murder (CUM)
  • First Degree Murder (IPE)
  • ​Second Degree Murder
  • Self-Defense
  • Voluntary Manslaughter (AP)
  • Imperfect Self-Defense
  • Involuntary Manslaughter
A

At CL, mrdr ws defined as th (1) U killing tht (2) C death of a prsn w/ (3) ma.

  • Causation: Pros mst shw D’s act ws (1) A (V nt die bt for D’s act) & (2) P cause (legally respons for fores death) of th V’s death.
  • Unlawful: H, [D] [did/not] hve a legal excuse for [D’s] actions sch as insanity, intox, or immaturity. [D]’s killing of another living human being, [V], [was] unlawful.
  • MA req (1) ItoK, (2) ItoIGBH, (3) DH, or (4) FM (barrk).
    • I to K: Action, accmpnied by th intnt to kill, whch is th legal cause of death, constitutes ItoK mrdr. H,T
    • ItoIGBH: A prsn who intnds sbi, bt actually succeeds in killing, is guilty of mrdr despite lack of ItoK. H,T
    • DH: A killing tht results frm D’s reckless actions tht manifests an extreme indifference to hmn life is DH mrdr. H,T
    • Felony Murder: To convict D of FM, pros mst est (1) D guilty of IDF (barrk), (2) F distinct frm killing, (3) death is fores result (prox) of F, & (4) killing occurs during commission or attmptd commission of F.

In conclusion, MA [could/not] be based on FM.

In conclusion, MA [could/not] be based on [insert applicable states of mind].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  • Common Law Murder (CUM)
  • First Degree Murder (IPE)
  • Second Degree Murder
  • Self-Defense
  • Voluntary Manslaughter (AP)
  • Imperfect Self-Defense
  • Involuntary Manslaughter
A

1st*M, created by sttute, is mrdr commttd (1) during perp of an IDF, (2) u/ P&D, or (3) using egregious means. H a sttute ws inferred frm [D] being arrested & charged w/ mrdr.

  • DPofIDF: Common IDF are [BARRK]. .
  • U/ P & D: Premed means D plans a killing. Delib means D reflects on th idea of killng after forming th ItoK long enough (even if briefly) to be fully conscious of th intnt & to hve considered th killing. H,T
  • Using Ergreious Means: 1st*M may result from an ergreious act (ambush, torture, bombing, terrorism, poisoning). H,T

​In conclusion, D cld be guilty of 1*M based on [#1,2,3].

2nd* Murder is (1) CL murder, or (2) all murder not in the 1*. H,T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  • Common Law Murder (CUM)
  • First Degree Murder (IPE)​
  • Second Degree Murder
  • Self-Defense
  • Voluntary Manslaughter
  • Imperfect Self-Defense
  • Involuntary Manslaughter
A

VM is murder committed in response to adequate prov. H

  • Adquate Prov: Prov is adeq if (1) inflames passion of a reas prsn (2) causes prsn to momentarily act out of passion rather thn reason, (3) thre is insuff time b/w prov & killing for a reas prsn to cool off, & (4) D in fact does nt cool off b/w prov & killing. H,T
    • Reas Prsn Words alone are nt suff prov, except whn words carry provocative info sch as threats of deadly force or adultery. D cannt be inflamed by cndct tht wld nt bother reas person. H,T
    • Causes Momentarily Act Out: Thre mst be a causal connection b/w prov, passion, and act. Thre is no mitigation if MA is formed prior to the prov. H,T
    • Insuf Time to cool off If thre is suff. time b/w prov & killing for a reas prsn to cool off, mrdr is nt mitigated to manslaughter. H,T
    • D did nt cool off D does not calm down.H,T

In conclusion,(conclude on mrdr reduced to VM).

Imperfect Self-Defense: occurs whn prsn claiming s-d honestly believes deadly force is req to prevent death or SBI, bt unjustifiably kills attacker. IS-D reduces mrdr to VM.H,T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • Common Law Murder (CUM)
  • First Degree Murder (PIPE)
  • Second Degree Murder
  • Self-Defense
  • Voluntary Manslaughter (AP)
  • Imperfect Self-Defense
  • Involuntary Manslaughter (CrimNeg, M/F)
A

IM is an unintntionl hom committd

(1) w/ crim neg (reckless action, or inaction whn thre is a dty to act, tht pts another prsn at sig risk of injury or death) or
(2) during an unlawful act (killing committed during comm of a misd or fel).H,T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Elements of a crime

Causation (homicide)

A

Causation The pros. mst shw D’s act ws the (1) A & (2) P cause of V’s death.

Actual [if felony murder, skip] If but for D’s acts, V wld nt hve died, D is actual cause (cause-in-fact) of the death. If there are multiple causes of the death, D is actual cause whn D’s acts are a substantial factor in causing the death.

Proximate cause exists when V’s death is a fores result of D’s acts. Whn multiple forces contribute to the death, an unfores intervening event severs the causal connection b/w a D’s acts and a V’s death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BARRE LEFT

  • Burglary
  • Arson
  • Robbery
  • Receipt of Stolen Property
  • Embezzlement
  • Larceny
  • Extortion
  • False Pretenses
  • Theft
A

Burglary is (1) B (using force to create opening into structure), and (2) E (3) the dwelling (structure reg occupied for habitation) of anther (4) at night (5) w/ th SI to commit a felony inside.

Mod, structure may include non-dwellings (eg businesses, buildings, cars, surrounding areas of a home), burglary is nt required to be committed at night, & th intndd crime may incl. misdeameanor thefts.

Arson is malicious burning of the dwelling house of another. Mod, mst jx incl. mst structures and burning incl. dgs caused by explosives too (nt just fire).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BARRE LEFT

  • Burglary
  • Arson
  • Robbery
  • Receipt of Stolen Property
  • Embezzlement
  • Larceny
  • Extortion
  • False Pretenses
  • Theft
A

Robbery is (1) L (2) by force or intmdation (3) whre prop taking is frm V’s prsn or presence.

RSP req (1) receiving cntrl of stolen prop, (2) w/ knwldge prop is stolen & (3) intent to perm deprive o.

Embezz is (1) fraudulent (2) conversion (3) of APP (4) by a prsn in lawful poss of th prop.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BARRE LEFT

  • Burglary
  • Arson
  • Robbery
  • Receipt of Stolen Property
  • Embezzlement
  • Larceny
  • Extortion
  • False Pretenses
  • Theft
A

Larceny is (1) T (2) T & (3) CA (4) of APP (5) w/ SI to PD tht p of th prop.

  • T Prop mst be taken without the owner’s consent.
  • T Tres prop rmvl frm o’s poss into anther’s cntrl satisfies taking.
  • CA Slight prop movement suffices.
  • APP Prop taken mst be prsnl, & in poss of someone other thn D.
  • SI to DP At time of taking, SItoPD prop o mst be present.

Extortion is (1) T (2) another’s (3) property (4) by threat.

False Pretenses occurs whn D (1) knwingly (2) makes a false representation of a past or present material fact (3) whch causes prsn to convey (3) title to th misrepresenter who (4) intends to defraud.

Theft is the illegal taking of another’s personal property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • Solicitation (merges)
  • Attempt (merges)
  • Conspiracy (does not merge)
A

Solicitation is (1) encouraging anther p (2) to commit a crime (3) w/ the SI the other p commits the crime.

Attempt req (1) SI to commit a crim act, (2) coup w/ a sub step taken toward comm of intndd crime, whch (3) fails to be completed.

Conspiracy is (1) an a/ment (2) b/w 2 or more p (3) w/ intent to accomplish an unlwfl purpose and (4) perf of an overt act in furtherance of sch a/ment (at CL, no overt act was req).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Accomplice Liability

  • Accomplice Liability
  • Accessory before the fact
  • Accessory After the fact
A

An accmplice is a prsn who, w/ intent tht a crime be committed, aid, abets, assists or encourages the principal & is physically or ocnstructively present. An accomplice is liable for all crimes he committed / assisted, and all foreseeable crimes commited by the principal. <em>Go through each crime committed by the Principal and decide whether that crime was a natural and probable consequence. Eg <u>Burglary</u> was a natural and probable consequence b/c… Thus, E committed burglary. </em>

Accessory before: is an accomplice who aids, abets, or encourages the principal but is not present at the crime.

Accessory after: A prsn is guilty of being an AAtheF if tht prsn knwingly aids a felon in escape from arrst, trial, conviction and/or punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DEFENSES TO MURDER

Crime Prevention

Redline Doctrine

Self-Defense

A

Crime Prevention:

Anyone can use non-deadly force to prevent a fel or serious brch of peace misdemeanor.

Trad, deadly force can be used to prevent any felony. Mod, deadly force may be used only to prevent an inherently dangerous felony involving risk to human life.

Redline Doctrine: U/ this doc, where a V or police officer kills a co-felon, D is gnrly not guilty of felony murder. H,T

Self-Defense: A prsn may use deadly force reas nec. to prevent death or SBI if (1) not the aggressor, & (2) confronted with imminent (not threatened) unlawful harm. H,T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

OPEN SIMMI

  • Defense of Others
  • Defense of Property
  • Entrapment
  • Necessity
  • Self-Defense
  • Intoxication (voluntary & involuntary)
  • Mistake
  • Insanity
  • Impossibility
A

U/ maj, a p may defend others if she reas believes the p assisted hs th legal right to use force in own defense. No special r/ship b/w defender & defended is needed.

U/ min, a p may defend others u/ the same circs as self-defense will be acceptable. Defender steps into the shoes of the defended. Defended mst be a member of the defender’s family or the defender’s employee or employer.

17
Q

OPEN SIMMI

  • Defense of Others
  • Defense of Property
  • Entrapment
  • Necessity
  • Self-Defense
  • Intoxication (voluntary & involuntary)
  • Mistake
  • Insanity
  • Impossibility

Defense of Property

A

A p in lawful poss of prop, threatened by anther’s act, w/ no time to seek law enforcement, may take reas steps, incl. non-deadly force to protect the prop.

  • Force: To use force, defender mst reas believe force is nec to prevent immediate danger of (1) unlwfl r.p. trespass or (2) prsnl prop being carried away. Force cannot be unreas disproportionate to perceived harm.
  • Deadly Force: No right to use deadly force in defending prpty, except to prevent or terminate a forcible felony in the dwelling, robbery, arson, or burglary. Use of deadly force against an intruder exiting the dwelling is gnrly not permitted. Mechanical devices cannot be used to protect prop.
18
Q

OPEN SIMMI

  • Defense of Others
  • Defense of Property
  • Entrapment
  • Necessity
  • Self-Defense (incl. imperfect)
  • Intoxication (voluntary & involuntary)
  • Mistake
  • Insanity
  • Impossibility
A

A p may use deadly force reas nec to prevent death or SBI if (1) nt th aggressor, & (2) cnfrntd w/ imm (nt threatened) unlwfl harm.

IS-D occurs whn th p claiming s-d honestly believes deadly force is req to prevent death or SBI, bt unjustifiably kills th attacker. Reduces mrdr to VM.

19
Q

OPEN SIMMI

  • Defense of Others
  • Defense of Property
  • Entrapment
  • Necessity
  • Self-Defense
  • Intoxication (voluntary & involuntary)
  • Mistake
  • Insanity
  • Impossibility
A

Intox can be caused by any substance and is vol or invol.

  • VI is intntionl taking of a substnce knwn to be intox’ing; actual intox need nt be intndd. VI is a defnse to SI crimes if it negates intent, a req crime element. VI is not a defense whn a crime req malice, recklessness, or neg, or is a SL crime. Eg: not a defense to CL Murder & Arson (b/c malice crimes)
    • VI is inapplicable whn (1) intnt is frmed b4 intox, or (2) D purposely becmes intox to est a VI defense.

VI <u>may</u> reduce 1M based on premed & deliberation to 2M, bt it will not reduce 2M to manslaughter.

  • II results frm taking an intox’ing substance (1) w/out knwldge of th intox nature, incl. pursuant to medical advice, or (2) under duress.
    • Insanity Defense: may be treated as a mental illness to negate a crime element, whch entitles D to acquittal if she meets th jx’s insanity test.
20
Q

Diminished Capacity

A

Diminished Capacity

Some states recognize the diminished capacity defense under which a D may assert that as a result of mental defect short of insanity, s/he does not have the mental state required for the crime charged. Here, Thus,

21
Q

Insanity

  • Durham
  • Irresistible Impulse
  • M’Naughten
  • Model Penal Code
A

Legal insanity involves whther, at time of a crime, D is so mentally ill she is excused frm legal responsiblity. 4 tests: DIMM.

The D mst show that…

  • Durham - his cndct ws th prdct of mntl illness (bt for test)
  • Irresistible impulse - he ws unable to cntrl his cndct due to a mntl illness
  • M’Naughten - he suffrd frm a mntl disease causing a defect in his reasoning pwrs tht resulted in him nt u/standng nature & quality of his acts
  • MPC - he lacked sub cpcity to apprciate th criminality of his cndct or confrm his conduct to th req of th law.
22
Q

OPEN SIMMI

  • Defense of Others
  • Defense of Property
  • Entrapment
  • Necessity
  • Self-Defense
  • Intoxication (voluntary & involuntary)
  • Mistake
  • Insanity
  • Impossibility
A

A MofF may negate a SI crime (1*M, attempt, assault, theft crimes) as well as malice, and may negate a GI crime if mistake was reas.

A mistake of law is not a defense.

Factual impos arises whn D makes a mistake sch tht it wld be factually imposs to complete crime. Not a valid defense.

Legal impossibility arises whn D incorrectly believes tht wht he is doing is a crime. Valid defense.

Entrapment exists whre a law enforcement official, or someone cooperating with her, induces a p to commit a crime that he wasn’t otherwise predisposed to commit. The maj of states look at the subjective intent of the D.