Prevention strategies (Epidemiology) Flashcards
Define High Risk Prevention strategy
Identifies people at high risk of a disease and reduce their risk i.e. clinical approach
e.g. Identify high risk patients through QRISK scores, use lifestyle and pharmacological measures to reduce risk
Define Population Approach to Prevention
Aims to reduce the risk of the whole population i.e. public health approach
e.g taxation of sugary drinks, banning cigarette adverts
What determines effectiveness of high risk vs population strategies
Distribution of disease risk in population
Average risk factor levels favour population strategy
High risk factor levels favour a high risk strategy
Strengths and weaknesses of High Risk prevention
Strengths
- Can offer a level of intervention appropriate to the individual
- Due to pt high risk the intervention is more likely to be effective and cost effective
- Approach fits within medical model
- Motivation of pt and doctor high
-Avoids interference with low risk groups
Weaknesses
- Process involves screening which provides an imperfect prediction of those at risk and has its own costs and risks
- Some high risk subjects will have already developed disease
- Not a radical approach and unlikely to have an impact on overall incidence in the whole population
- Singles out, medicalises and labels individuals as abnormal
Strengths and weaknesses of population prevention strategies
Strengths
-No need for some individuals to behave differently from others
- Large benefits for whole populations, especially where risk is widespread
- Radical and aims to reduce disease incidence
- Does not require screening or identification of high risk groups
- Doesn’t depend on medical care which tends to be expensive
Weaknesses
- Poorly motivated and depends on sense of public purpose/political will
- Benefit for individuals is small
- Prevention paradox - the actual number of cases coming out of high risk population is small, majority come from a population at low/mod risk
- If strategy involves exposure to new factor with potential adverse effects, the gap between benefit and harm may narrow