Presidential Elections and the Presidency Flashcards
caucus system
- nominating presidential candidates
- Andrew Jackson and Whigs held this during 1830s
Progressive reformers
promoted primary elections as a way of giving voters a greater role in the nomination process
frontloading
three-fourths of the primaries are now held between February and mid-March
closed primary
voters required to identify party preference and are not allowed to split ticket
open primary
voters can decide on Election Day whether they want to participate in Democratic or Republican contest
winner-take-all vs. proportional representation elections
Republican: both
Democratic: proportional that awards delegates based on percentage of votes a candidate receives
party conventions
- select presidential and vice-presidential candidates after days of debates
- now, due to primaries, debates are over before convention even begins
conventions’ three major functions
- formally name the party’s presidential and vice-presidential candidates
- adopt a party platform
- attempt to unify party and generate positive publicity and momentum
Federal Election Reform Act of 1974
- created Federal Election Commission to administer and enforce campaign finance laws
- provided partial public funding for presidential primaries
- provided full public financing for major party candidates in the general election
- placed limitations on individual contributions to presidential candidates
Buckley v. Valeo
- SC struck down portion of Act that limited amount of money an individual could contribute to his own campaign
- protected free speech
soft money
- unregulated donations to political parties for party-building expenses
- laws fail to regulate this
- circumvent limitations on hard money contributions
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002
eliminated soft money contributions
527 groups
tax-exempt organization created to influence the political process
- not regulated by Federal Election Commission bc they do not coordinate their activities with candidate or party
- $420 million on political messages
electoral college
- safeguard the presidency from the direct popular election
- each state has as many electoral votes as its combined total of representatives and senators
consequences of winner-take-all electoral college
k
electoral college
- safeguard the presidency from the direct popular election
- each state has as many electoral votes as its combined total of representatives and senators
- presidential candidate who receives most votes wins all of a state’s electoral votes
consequences of winner-take-all electoral college
- devote a disproportionate amount of time and resources to closely contested states, swing states, and competitive states
- emphasize issues that may swing a key bloc of voters in a pivotal state
- restricts the prospect of third-party candidates
reasons why electoral college has not been abolished
- requires a constitutional amendment to abolish the electoral college
- benefits the small states that are guaranteed at least 3 electoral votes
- benefits racial minorities and interest groups located in key states
- no consensus on how to reform it
reasons why electoral college has not been abolished
- requires a constitutional amendment to abolish the electoral college
- benefits the small states that are guaranteed at least 3 electoral votes
- benefits racial minorities and interest groups located in key states
- no consensus on how to reform it
the president has the power to appoint which officials?
- cabinet members and their top aides
- heads of independent agencies
- ambassadors and other diplomats
- all federal judges, U.S. marshals, and attorneys
- followed by confirmation in Senate