Practice of IA: Managing Flashcards
A chief audit executive invests considerable time in developing his annual and long-term budgets. The budgeting process is an example of which basic function of internal audit management?
- Directing
- Planning
- Organizing
- Monitoring
2- Planning
Rationale
A well-developed budget is the key component of planning that enables the internal audit activity to perform its mission on time and within established financial parameters.
Which of the following is a valid method to use when performing a control self-assessment (CSA)?
- Management-produced analyses
- Walkthroughs
- Observation
- Human resources complaint procedures
1- Management-produced analyses
Rationale
CSAs can take the form of management-produced analyses. Although complaints may be reviewed, investigated, and documented, the purpose of a CSA is to collect all information related to the nature and scope of the audit. The information gathered needs to be extensive, objective, and specific.
A Certified Internal Auditor directs the audit function for a large city and is planning the audit schedule for the next year. The city has a number of different funds, some that are restricted in use by government grants and some that require reports to the government. One of the programs for which the city has received a grant is job retraining and placement. The grant specifies certain conditions a participant in the program must meet in order to be eligible for the funding. The auditor randomly selects participants in the job retraining program for the past year to verify that they met all the eligibility requirements. This type of audit is best referred to as a(n)
- program audit.
- economy and efficiency audit.
- operational audit.
- compliance audit.
4- compliance audit.
Rationale
The auditor is determining that the participants have complied with the eligibility requirements. An operational audit would focus on the overall operations of the jobs retraining program. An economy and efficiency audit would address the cost of the program and compare it with the objectives achieved. A program audit is broader in context and would address the achievement of the overall program objectives.
Assume that your company is considering purchasing a small toxic waste disposal company. As an internal auditor, you are part of the team doing a due diligence review for the acquisition. Your scope (as an auditor) would most likely include
- a review of the waste company’s procedures for acceptance of waste material and comparison with international toxic waste disposal companies.
- analysis of the waste company’s compliance with and disclosure of loan covenants.
- an evaluation of the merit of lawsuits currently filed against the waste company.
- assessment of the waste company’s privacy policies to ensure that customer dropoffs do not generate negative publicity.
2- analysis of the waste company’s compliance with and disclosure of loan covenants.
Rationale
It is important to ensure that a prospective company is not at risk of default on loans. While the procedures for acceptance of waste material are of interest, comparing them to those of international companies would not have much relevance, as other countries would have different laws and regulations. Rather, they should be compared against relevant laws and regulations of the country in which the company operates. The merit of a lawsuit is a matter of legal judgment; it is beyond the expertise of the internal audit activity. If the waste company is operating in compliance with laws and regulations, it should be transparent rather than secretive.
An internal auditor has been given the task of determining if a vendor is meeting its contract requirements. Which is a factor to be considered?
- Whether the vendor is outsourcing some of the production
- Whether the quality of the product meets specifications
- Whether accounts payable is processing payments on or before the payment deadline
- Whether the vendor is going above and beyond minimum requirements
2- Whether the quality of the product meets specifications
Rationale
In a contract audit, the internal auditor is concerned only with items specified in the actual contract. Normally, this includes such things as the quality of the product and the correct quantity and timing of deliverables rather than if the vendor is paid on time or correctly. Additional actions may be identified that are not part of the contract; these actions might increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the work being performed.
Which of the following poses the greatest risk in external business relationships?
- Organization’s responsibility for actions of its partners
- External business partner’s inefficient business processes
- External business partner’s lack of compliance metrics
- External business partner’s lack of confidentiality standards
1- Organization’s responsibility for actions of its partners
Rationale
An overarching risk of external business partners is that the organization will be held responsible for the actions of its partners and perhaps even of the partners of those partners (i.e., third-tier supply chain). Contractual provisions can help transfer some of this risk, but other risks, such as reputation risk, cannot be transferred. Lack of confidentiality standards and/or compliance metrics and/or inefficient processes would not pose risk as significant as the organization being responsible for the actions of its partners.
In evaluating the organization’s privacy framework, internal audit performs compliance audits, including assessing practices, processes, and controls. This level of involvement demonstrates which level of organizational maturity concerning privacy protection?
- Repeatable
- Defined
- Managed
- Optimizing
2- Defined
Rationale
In a model with five levels of privacy protection maturity (initial, repeatable, defined, managed, optimizing), this would be the defined level. At this stage, the organization has demonstrated senior management commitment, complete privacy policy, and privacy organization. Leadership is in place. Risk assessments have been performed, and consistent organization-wide controls are underway.
The costs of quality that are incurred to evaluate purchased materials, processes, products, and services to ensure conformance to specifications are referred to as
- internal failure costs.
- external failure costs.
- appraisal costs.
- prevention costs.
3- appraisal costs.
Rationale
Appraisal costs are those costs incurred to evaluate purchased materials, processes, products, and services to ensure conformance to specifications These costs include inspecting and testing raw materials and work-in-process inventory.
In order to provide the board and senior management with an overall opinion on internal control, a chief audit executive (CAE) is compiling the results of internal control evaluations accumulated from individual audit engagements. The CAE notes that management consistently fails to correlate objectives, risks to objectives, and internal controls designed to address identified risks. Which of the following is the CAE’s best course of action?
- Recommend that internal controls units be established for major lines of business, to support risk management activities.
- Recommend an organization-wide implementation of an internal control framework.
- Recommend extensive internal controls training for all process owners and supervisors.
- Recommend that the audit committee review details of all internal audit reports rather than only executive summaries.
2- Recommend an organization-wide implementation of an internal control framework.
Rationale
The implementation guidance for Standard 2130, “Control,” states the following: “To promote continuous improvement in maintaining effective controls, the internal audit activity typically provides the board and senior management with an overall assessment or compiles the results of control evaluations accumulated from individual audit engagements. The CAE may recommend the implementation of a control framework if one is not already in place.” None of the other answer choices are likely to result in an understanding of the correlation between objectives, risks, and controls.
If a department outside of the internal audit activity is responsible for reviewing a function or process, the internal auditors should
- ignore the work of the other department and proceed with an independent audit.
- yield the responsibility for assessing the function or process to the other department.
- reduce the scope of the audit, since the work has already been performed by the other department.
- consider the work of the other department when assessing the function or process.
4- consider the work of the other department when assessing the function or process
Rationale
Review and testing of the other department’s procedures may reduce necessary audit coverage of the function or process.
As part of the internal audit activity’s internal quality assurance program, periodic self-assessments should include
- an independent evaluation of conformance to the Standards by a qualified external assessor.
- recommendations on use of information technology to enhance internal audit efficiency and effectiveness.
- validation of continued conformance with the Standards and the Code of Ethics by a member of the internal audit activity.
- reporting results to external stakeholders, such as regulatory examiners.
3- validation of continued conformance with the Standards and the Code of Ethics by a member of the internal audit activity.
Rationale
Validation of continued conformance with the Standards and the Code of Ethics by a member of the internal audit activity is the substance of periodic self-assessments. Recommendations on use of information technology may be but aren’t necessarily an output of a periodic self-assessment. The external assessor’s evaluation of Standards conformance is part of the external quality assessment activity, not internal periodic self-assessments. The results of periodic self-assessments are reported to senior management and the board at an agreed-upon frequency.
The foundation of internal audit resource allocation should be the
- time and budget constraints.
- risks and expectations of how internal audit can add value.
- audit universe.
- existing skill sets of internal audit resources.
2- risks and expectations of how internal audit can add value.
Rationale
If the chief audit executive has a strong understanding of organizational risks and how internal audit can add value, he or she can then ensure that appropriate resources are available, whether in-sourced, co-sourced, or out-sourced. Existing internal audit resources or time and budget should not be the primary focus and constraint in how the internal audit activity addresses organizational risks.
A consulting activity appropriately performed by the internal audit function is
- drafting procedures for systems of control.
- designing systems of control.
- installing systems of control.
- reviewing systems of control before implementation.
4- reviewing systems of control before implementation.
Rationale
Reviewing systems, even before implementation, is an activity appropriately performed by the internal audit function, and it does not impair objectivity.
Reporting on the internal audit activity’s performance relative to its risk-based annual audit plan
- is a best practice for audit activities of public companies.
- is mandated by the Standards for all internal audit activities.
- is a required performance metric for the chief audit executive.
- is essential for proper audit activity resource allocation.
2- is mandated by the Standards for all internal audit activities.
Rationale
According to Standard 2060, “Reporting to Senior Management and the Board,” the chief audit executive (CAE) has the responsibility to report periodically to senior management and the board on the internal audit activity’s purpose, authority, responsibility, and performance relative to its plan. Reporting performance relative to plan may also be part of the audit activity’s ongoing monitoring related to its internal quality assurance and improvement program elements. Such reporting is a best practice for all audit activities as it is required by Standard 2060. Internal audit guidance does not mandate CAE performance metrics. While proper resource allocation may be essential to achieving the audit plan, reporting on performance relative to plan is not essential to proper resource allocation.
A new chief audit executive (CAE) needs to establish reporting protocols for the frequency of communicating significant risk and control issues to senior management and the board. To determine the frequency of reporting, the CAE should
- consider resource constraints impacting internal audit communications of significant risk and control matters.
- collaborate with senior management and the board to establish appropriate reporting frequencies.
- collaborate with compliance, risk management, and other second line leadership on their reporting protocols.
- consider the past results of and the timing and extent of planned external auditor testing.
2- collaborate with senior management and the board to establish appropriate reporting frequencies
Rationale
The interpretation to Standard 2060, “Reporting to Senior Management and the Board,” states, “The frequency and content of reporting are determined collaboratively by the chief audit executive, senior management, and the board.” External auditor testing would not impact the frequency of internal audit reporting. Resource constraints would not be a primary consideration for establishing protocols for the frequency of internal audit reporting, and the frequency would not be impacted by second line reporting protocols.
To promote continuous improvement in control effectiveness, the internal audit activity may
- establish a logical structure for documenting and analyzing the organization’s design and operation of controls.
- help management keep abreast of emerging issues, laws, and regulations related to control requirements.
- design internal controls to address residual risks related to operations, compliance, and reporting objectives.
- implement management monitoring activities to ensure ongoing effectiveness of internal controls.
2- help management keep abreast of emerging issues, laws, and regulations related to control requirements.
Rationale
According to the implementation guidance for Standard 2130, “Control,” the internal audit activity may help management keep abreast of emerging issues, laws, and regulations related to control requirements to promote continuous improvement in control effectiveness. Residual risks are generally unmitigated. Nevertheless, management is responsible for internal control design, not internal audit. Management, not internal audit, is responsible for establishing a structure for documenting and analyzing controls and implementing management monitoring activities.
Which of the following is an example of an efficiency measure?
- Rate of customer complaints
- Number of insurance claims processed per day
- Goal of becoming a leading manufacturer
- Rate of absenteeism
2- Number of insurance claims processed per day
Rationale
Efficiency is the ratio of effective output to the input required to achieve it. Insurance claims processed per day compares the output (claims processed) to the input (a day’s work).
When interviewing candidates for an internal auditing position, a manager prefers to ask questions about how the candidate handled challenges in his or her previous position. This is an example of
- structured interviewing.
- behavioral interviewing.
- situational interviewing.
- initial screening.
2- behavioral interviewing.
Rationale
This is an example of behavioral interviewing, trying to predict future job performance based on past behaviors. Situational interviewing is similar but is based on hypothetical questions such as How would you handle the following situation?…”
Internal auditors can evaluate the management function of planning (as opposed to organizing, directing, or monitoring) by determining
- whether employee compensation is consistent with the organization’s specifications for compensation ranges by employee grade.
- whether new standards of performance are established and disseminated when the old standards are inadequate or ineffective.
- what managers are responsible for and what they are authorized to do.
- whether each management plan carries a means of measuring its success.
4- whether each management plan carries a means of measuring its success
Rationale
Determining whether each plan carries a means of measuring its success is one way internal auditors facilitate the management function of planning. Determining what managers are responsible for and what they are authorized to do relates to the management function of organizing. Determining whether employee compensation is consistent relates to the management function of directing. Determining whether new standards of performance are established and disseminated when the old standards are ineffective relates to the management functions of directing and monitoring.
According to Implementation Guide 2050, what does the chief audit executive (CAE) need to do prior to coordinating with other assurance and consulting service providers?
- Meet with the providers to understand their specific roles.
- Establish rapport by informally socializing with them.
- Get the permission of the board to start coordinating.
- Establish trust by indicating that the internal audit function can rely on their work.
1- Meet with the providers to understand their specific roles
Rationale
Implementation Guide 2050 states: “The roles of assurance and consulting service providers vary by organization. Thus, to start the task of coordinating their efforts, the chief audit executive…identifies the various roles of existing…providers. The CAE meets with each of the providers to gather sufficient information so that the organization’s assurance and consulting activities may be coordinated.”
A chief audit executive (CAE) decides to recruit independent contractors to augment the skill sets of his internal audit team in order to accomplish the annual risk-based plan. The CAE should
- enhance the audit activity’s training programs to build the lacking skill sets within the current internal audit team.
- ensure that all contracted service providers are either Certified Internal Auditors (CIAs) or Certified Information Systems Auditors (CISAs).
- ensure that the independent contractor arrangement is exclusive; contractors should not perform work for other audit activities.
- establish a process and criteria to determine whether the internal audit activity may rely on the work of independent contractors.
4- establish a process and criteria to determine whether the internal audit activity may rely on the work of independent contractors.
Rationale
According to the implementation guidance for Standard 2050, “Coordination and Reliance,” it is essential that the CAE establish a consistent process and set of criteria to determine whether the internal audit activity may rely on the work of another provider. Using independent contractors who hold CIA or CISA certifications may or may not provide the needed skill sets. The CAE should ensure that confidentiality expectations are upheld, but an exclusive relationship may not be realistic or may require an employer-employee relationship, depending on employment and tax laws in the jurisdiction. Training may not produce the required skill sets in a timely fashion, may not be a substitute for necessary experience, or may be costly and therefore may not be a reasonable solution.
In designing a control self-assessment (CSA) workshop, which of the following elements merits the most serious attention?
- Developing metrics to assess respondents’ answers to pre-workshop questionnaires
- Scheduling time for participants to review information and suggest improvements
- Designing carefully worded yes-no questions to ensure the gathering of precise information
- Carefully briefing management to be certain to get higher-level commitment to the process
2- Scheduling time for participants to review information and suggest improvements
Rationale
All of the answers identify valid concerns, but the essence of CSA is the involvement of staff and management with a sense of ownership to be active process participants. Their knowledge and experience in the process being discussed will enhance the opportunity for agreement on process improvement.
An approved risk-based internal audit plan should
- be frozen once completed and monitored for actual performance, with results reported to the audit committee no less frequently than monthly.
- primarily consider cybersecurity and fraud risks, leaving things like brand and reputation risks to the enterprise risk management teams.
- be flexible to allow adjustment, as necessary, due to changes in business, programs, systems, controls, and emerging risks.
- meet the generally accepted expectations of industry standards-setting bodies and regulatory compliance examiners.
3- be flexible to allow adjustment, as necessary, due to changes in business, programs, systems, controls, and emerging risks.
Rationale
Implementation guidance for Standard 2010, “Planning,” states, “The internal audit plan is flexible enough to allow the CAE to review and adjust it as necessary in response to changes in the organization’s business, risks, operations, programs, systems, and controls.” The IIA’s guidance does not prescribe the frequency of reporting actual performance compared to the audit plan. Annual risk-based audit planning considers all significant risks to achieving organizational objectives and strategies and considers input from many stakeholders.
An organization is considering establishing a B2B (business-to-business) e-commerce relationship with a new trading partner. Which would be appropriate risk factors to consider when setting the objectives of an external business relationship assurance engagement?
- Assurance of trustworthiness
- Channel security through appropriate controls (i.e., encryption)
- Privacy of data arrangements
- Redundancy and failover of trading partner systems (in relation to downtime tolerance)
3- Privacy of data arrangements
Rationale
Privacy considerations are germane to a B2B e-commerce risk assessment and achieving an acceptable level of comfort regarding B2B linkages with a current or prospective trading partner. Trustworthiness is not something that can be easily assured. This objective would be better stated in a different way, such as prior contract compliance, history of good faith dealing, and so on, so it is not the best answer. The remaining answer choices are more technical in nature and are not good objectives but could be inclusions in a subsequent investigation.
Knowledge of controls gained from consulting engagements
- must be disregarded when internal controls are excluded from consulting engagement objectives.
- must be incorporated into controls assessment engagements.
- should be communicated to senior management and the board.
- should not be considered during assurance engagements.
2- must be incorporated into controls assessment engagements.
Rationale
Implementation Standard 2130.C1 (Consulting Engagements) states, “Internal auditors must incorporate knowledge of controls gained from consulting engagements into evaluation of the organization’s control processes.” Therefore, this knowledge should be considered during assurance engagements but doesn’t necessarily need to be communicated to senior management and the board. Knowledge of controls gained from consulting engagements should not be disregarded whether controls are included or excluded from consulting engagement objectives.
Which of the following best describes the internal audit activity’s role in supporting the board in enterprise-wide risk assessment?
- Oversee risk management processes to determine whether they are adequate and effective.
- Examine, evaluate, report on, and recommend improvements on the adequacy and effectiveness of risk processes.
- Implement risk management methodologies and controls to address risks identified.
- Ensure that sound risk management processes are in place and functioning.
2- Examine, evaluate, report on, and recommend improvements on the adequacy and effectiveness of risk processes.
Rationale
Internal auditors are experts in understanding organizational risks and internal controls and are engaged to help management protect their organizations from present and future risk exposure. The internal audit activity assists both management and the oversight body in enterprise risk management (ERM) by helping management to examine and evaluate governance, internal controls, and risk management processes. After audit activities have been completed, the auditor(s) will report their findings to the board and recommend relevant improvements.
A company recently acquired a small competitor organization because of its complementary line of business. Prior to the acquisition, high regulatory and compliance risks had led the company’s chief audit executive (CAE) to focus primarily on compliance assurance, but she is now recognizing the enhanced operational and strategic risks associated with the acquisition. Based on her updated risk assessment and resulting audit plan amendments, the CAE plans to communicate her resource requirements to senior management and the board. She must also communicate information about
- internal audit’s needed strategies for favorably impacting the governance of the combined organization.
- the needed changes to the audit charter and the audit activity’s purpose, authority, and responsibility.
- the ten Core Principles and how they are or are not evidenced in the culture of the acquired organization.
- the acquired organization’s adherence (or lack thereof) to the COSO Internal Control—Integrated Framework or other control framework.
2- the needed changes to the audit charter and the audit activity’s purpose, authority, and responsibility.
Rationale
According to Standard 2060, “Reporting to Senior Management and the Board,” the CAE must report periodically to senior management and the board on the internal audit activity’s purpose, authority, and responsibility. The interpretation for Standard 2060 states that the CAE’s reporting must include information about the audit charter. Since the CAE plans to shift focus from primarily compliance assurance, adding operational and strategic risk elements to the audit plan, the internal audit charter should be amended to reflect the expanded purpose and responsibility of the audit activity. The ten Core Principles, as one element of mandatory guidance, apply to the internal audit activity, not the culture of the organization. Adherence to a control framework is not a mandated communication by the CAE. There is no mandate in internal audit guidance to communicate strategies for impacting governance to senior management and the board.
Which of the following is the most important provision for an internal auditor from a start-up company to recommend for inclusion in a contract for the third-party augmentation of the company’s new customizable business application system?
- Limitation-of-liabilities clause
- Source code escrow clause
- Copyright clause
- Right-to-audit clause
2- Source code escrow clause
Rationale
Source code is likely a start-up company’s most valuable asset. Therefore, it is important to protect the company’s intellectual property (IP) in any external business relationship in which the organization must share this confidential information. By using a third party, the company can work easily with customers on older or retired products while never having to disclose proprietary information and code. In third-party relationships, the third party has a right to audit the contractor and will likely share liabilities.
The chief audit executive (CAE) of a small community bank needs to recruit and hire three entry-level internal auditors, due to the bank’s rapid growth through mergers and acquisitions. The audit activity is currently staffed with a cohesive group of experienced high performers. The CAE wants her team to gain supervisory and managerial skills through the development, coaching, and mentoring of the three new staff members. While recruiting at a local university, which of the following is the most effective interview approach for the CAE to use?
- Situational
- Behavioral
- Structured
- Stress
3- Structured
Rationale
In a structured interview, applicants are asked the same questions, with follow-up questions as needed. A guide is developed to focus on necessary skills, knowledge, experience, and attitudes, which helps ensure consistency and completeness in the interviewing process and also supports legal compliance. This approach is appropriate for entry-level professional positions, such as internal audit roles.
In a top-down approach to new systems development, what should be reviewed before designing any system elements?
- Controls in place over the current system
- Types of processing systems used by competitors
- Computer equipment needed by the system
- Information needs of managers for planning and control
4- Information needs of managers for planning and control
Rationale
Users’ information needs and objectives should be of primary concern. The other answer choices may be irrelevant, unknown, or unimportant.
According to the Standards, internal audit must report to senior management and the board on its conformance
- with the Code of Ethics and the Standards.
- with the Mission Statement and the Core Principles.
- with the Core Principles and the Code of Ethics.
- with the Standards and Implementation Guidance.
1- with the Code of Ethics and the Standards.
Rationale
Standard 2060, “Reporting to Senior Management and the Board,” states the following: “The chief audit executive must report periodically to senior management and the board on its conformance with the Code of Ethics and the Standards.” The Standards do not include a requirement to report on internal audit’s conformance with the Mission Statement, the Core Principles, or Implementation Guidance.
A chief audit executive (CAE) is preparing his overall opinion on internal control for presentation to senior management and the board. The CAE disregards a co-sourced service provider’s opinion regarding several material internal control weaknesses related to information technology general controls. This is
- an example of audit detection risk.
- appropriate, if based on the CAE’s professional judgment.
- a violation of The IIA’s Standards.
- a disservice to the chief information officer (CIO).
3- a violation of The IIA’s Standards.
Rationale
According to the interpretation for Standard 2450, “Overall Opinions,” the communication will include consideration of all related projects, including the reliance on other assurance providers. Since interpretations to the Standards are mandatory requirements, failure to consider the co-sourced service provider’s opinion is a violation of The IIA’S Standards and would not be appropriate. Audit detection risk is caused by the auditor’s failure to discover material internal control weaknesses. In this case, the service provider identified the weaknesses but the CAE failed to consider this in his overall opinion. Failure to consider material IT general controls weaknesses would not necessarily be a disservice to the CIO, since the CIO may prefer that these weaknesses are not considered or at least not disclosed to senior management and the board as part of an overall opinion on internal control.
Because of the nature of work at a company’s plants, radiation safety is important. An audit to test the system of controls over the purchase, distribution, and use of radioactive material is being conducted. The process is well documented, and employees in the safety department are very familiar with the department’s procedures. Since the purchasing and facilities departments are involved in the process, the auditor is considering reviewing their procedures for handling radioactive material as well. The auditor should
- adjust the audit schedule and budget, if needed, and interview the appropriate individuals in purchasing and facilities to ascertain whether additional controls exist that complement those identified within the safety department.
- test the controls identified within the safety department; if results are unfavorable, consider whether to involve the other departments.
- defer questions regarding purchasing, facilities, and other departments until audit projects can be scheduled for those departments.
- have confidence in the rigorous and detailed safety department procedures, since that department has the main responsibility for radiation safety; the auditor should not use audit time to review other departments.
1- adjust the audit schedule and budget, if needed, and interview the appropriate individuals in purchasing and facilities to ascertain whether additional controls exist that complement those identified within the safety department.
Rationale
The risk of having radioactive materials on site that are not accounted for in the facility’s inventory is sufficiently serious that all key controls should be identified and evaluated. The auditor is obliged to note that the risk extends beyond the safety department and should request resources to finish this important work.
As part of cash management procedures, the treasurer of a nonprofit organization has decided to invest in a variety of new financial instruments. The audit committee has asked the internal audit department to conduct an audit of the adequacy of controls over the new investing techniques. Which is an important part of such an audit?
- Determining if policies exist that describe the risks the treasurer may take as long as there is no loss of principal balances in stock market investments
- Determining the extent of management oversight of investments in sophisticated instruments
- Determining the nature of controls established by compliance professionals to monitor the risks in the investments
- Determining whether the treasurer is getting higher or lower rates of return on investments than are treasurers in comparable organizations
2- Determining the extent of management oversight of investments in sophisticated instruments
Rationale
It is important to determine the extent of management oversight of investments, especially for sophisticated instruments. No control or policy can guarantee that a stock market investment will not lose value. The treasurer is responsible for establishing controls over monitoring the risks in investments. Although a comparative analysis of investment returns might be informational, there is no need to benchmark investment returns against those of other organizations. Indeed, financial investment scandals have shown that such comparisons can be highly misleading because high returns can be due to taking on a high level of risk. Also, this is not a test of the adequacy of the controls.
Several members of an organization’s senior management have questioned whether the internal audit activity should report to the newly established quality audit function as part of the total quality management process within the organization. The chief audit executive (CAE) has reviewed the quality audit standards and the programs that the quality audit manager has proposed. The CAE’s response to senior management should include which of the following?
- Estimating departmental cost savings that would result from the elimination of the internal audit activity
- Changing the applicable standards for internal auditing within the organization to provide compliance with quality audit standards
- Identifying appropriate liaison activities with the quality audit function to ensure coordination of audit schedules and overall audit responsibilities
- Changing the qualification requirements for new staff members to include quality audit experience
3- Identifying appropriate liaison activities with the quality audit function to ensure coordination of audit schedules and overall audit responsibilities
Rationale
An internal auditor should always consider the added value of coordinating internal and external audit work to increase economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of the overall audit process—for example, with other internal assurance functions, such as quality control. By coordinating, the two functions can provide support for each other and potentially make the audit process more efficient. Therefore, when responding to management in this scenario, the CAE should identify ways in which he or she believes working with the quality audit function can enhance the audit function.
As part of an internal audit, a benchmark must be established for the defect rate for an innovative new production process. The auditor can either use a large sample that is already available from other production processes in the same plant or draw a fresh sample from the new process. However, a fresh sample would be expensive, time-consuming, and much smaller in size. Which of the following is the best course of action for the auditor?
- The auditor should accept the historical sample but use nonparametric statistics to analyze it.
- The auditor should accept the large historical sample because analyses based on it will have high statistical power.
- The auditor should first determine how similar the new process is to the old process before deciding what to do.
- The auditor should draw a fresh sample and combine it with the old sample.
3- The auditor should first determine how similar the new process is to the old process before deciding what to do.
Rationale
The first question that should always be asked concerning the use of historical data is how representative the process that generated it is compared to the process currently under study.