Essentials: Independence & Objectivity Flashcards
Which activity would be presumed to impair the objectivity of an internal auditor if done within the past year?
A) Drafting procedures for running a new computer application to ensure that proper controls are installed
B) Recommending standards of control for a new information system application
C) Performing reviews of procedures for a new computer application before it is installed
D) Noting that the chief audit executive has multiple direct interactions with the board related to a new information system
Drafting procedures for running a new computer application to ensure that proper controls are installed
Rationale
Standard 1130.A1 says in part, “Objectivity is presumed to be impaired if an internal auditor provides assurance services for an activity for which the internal auditor had responsibility within the previous year.” The other answer choices are not presumed to impair objectivity per Standard 1130.
Management has requested the internal auditing department to perform an operational audit of the telephone marketing operations of a major division and to recommend procedures and policies for improving management control over the operation. The auditor should
A) not accept the engagement, because recommending controls would impair the future objectivity of the department regarding this auditee.
B) not accept the engagement, because audit departments are presumed to have expertise in accounting controls, not marketing controls.
C) accept the audit engagement, because objectivity would not be impaired.
D) accept the engagement, but indicate to management that recommending controls would impair audit independence so management knows that near-future audits of the area by the same auditor would be impaired.
accept the audit engagement, because objectivity would not be impaired.
Rationale
The auditor should accept the engagement, assign staff with sufficient control knowledge, and make recommendations where appropriate. This would not impair objectivity.
An internal auditor has been assigned to an assurance audit of the organization’s training department. Which condition would constitute a threat to the internal auditor’s objectivity, as defined by The IIA’s Code of Ethics?
A) The auditor has a very unfavorable opinion of the department based on experience with its internal seminars.
B) The auditor has a background in developing training materials from a previous job with another organization.
C) The auditor has a very favorable opinion of the organization overall based on its national reputation.
D) The auditor is unfamiliar with the basic principles of training.
The auditor has a very unfavorable opinion of the department based on experience with its internal seminars.
Rationale
The internal auditor’s objectivity may be compromised by either a positive or negative predisposition in regard to the audit client. However, the overall organization is not the current audit client, and, in assessing objectivity, it is important to consider what would be “reasonable” versus what could be perceived as a conflict of interest. Experience with another organization’s approach to training is not necessarily a problem for objectivity.
To manage internal audit objectivity effectively, the chief audit executive (CAE) should establish expectations and requirements for an unbiased mindset for every internal auditor. Such expectations would be most evident in the internal auditor’s review of
A) going-concern assessments.
B) laws and regulations.
C) industry best-practices guides.
D) inventory estimates.
inventory estimates.
Rationale
A review of inventory estimates would require an auditor to maintain a high level of individual objectivity due to the subjectivity potential of estimates. There is little room for subjectivity in industry best-practice guides or laws and regulations. Going-concern assessments may involve some subjectivity, but much of the data will be objective financial data.
The chief audit executive (CAE) of an internal audit activity has a strong financial background but takes on a consulting engagement with the human resources department. In this engagement, the CAE develops an interview guide and supervises the process of hiring an investment professional to design and administer a new retirement plan. Which of the following constitutes the major problem with this arrangement?
A) The arrangement subtracts from the availability of audit activity resources for assurance engagements.
B) Helping select a key person in the human resources department potentially compromises the independence and objectivity of the CAE and the value of the audit activity.
C) The engagement risks reducing the organizational status of the internal audit activity if the new person proves inadequate to the job.
D) The CAE’s experience in finance is not relevant to hiring.
Helping select a key person in the human resources department potentially compromises the independence and objectivity of the CAE and the value of the audit activity.
Rationale
When an internal auditor participates directly in the functioning of other areas in the organization, he or she may compromise the ability to assess those areas objectively in future audits. The CAE may or may not have expertise in hiring as well as finance. Every engagement to some degree removes resources available for other engagements, and every engagement is an opportunity for the internal audit activity either to raise or reduce its reputation in the organization.
Which of the following activities undertaken by the internal auditor might be in conflict with the standard of independence?
A) Acting as external audit liaison
B) Acting as an ethics advocate
C) Acting as a product development temporary project manager
D) Acting as a risk management consultant
Acting as a product development temporary project manager
Rationale
Some activities, such as acting as the leader of a project, may conflict with the independence attribute of the internal audit activity. The auditor can be a consultant to the project but should not participate as project manager. The other options do not conflict with the independence of the internal audit activity.
An organization is in the process of establishing its new internal audit department. The controller has had no previous experience with internal auditors. Due to this lack of experience, the controller advises applicants that they will be reporting to the external auditors. However, the new chief audit executive (CAE) will have free access to the controller to report anything important. The controller will convey the CAE’s concerns to the board of directors. Which of the following is true?
A) The internal audit department will not be independent because the company has not specified that the applicants be Certified Internal Auditors.
B) The internal audit department will not be independent because the controller has no experience with internal auditors.
C) The internal audit department will not be independent because the CAE reports to the external auditors.
D) The internal audit department will be independent because the CAE has direct access to the board of directors.
The internal audit department will not be independent because the CAE reports to the external auditors.
Rationale
The internal audit department will not be independent because the reporting structure has the CAE reporting to the external auditors. According to Standard 1110, “The chief audit executive must report to a level within the organization that allows the internal audit activity to fulfill its responsibilities.” External auditors are not individuals in the organization. Organizational independence is effectively achieved when the CAE has direct and unrestricted access to the board. The access in this case is indirect, via the controller. Whether the controller has experience with internal auditors does not affect the audit department’s independence. Although desirable, the Certified Internal Auditor designation is not mandatory for a person to become an internal auditor. A CIA would, of course, insist on internal audit department independence.
An internal auditor believes that the accounts receivable account balances may not be accurate. Which procedure listed would best demonstrate his/her professional skepticism?
A) Interviewing the company’s salespeople responsible for generating the sales
B) Tracing the fund balance to the general ledger
C) Performing a statistical sample of the accounts and tracing them to the source documentation
D) Issuing third-party confirmations to the customers owing the money
Issuing third-party confirmations to the customers owing the money
Rationale
Maintaining professional skepticism ensures that internal auditors do not make undue assumptions about the validity of support such as verbal explanations from management or other information received without an appropriate level of objective verification of such support. Issuing third-party confirmations to the customers owing the money would be an independent source to verify the accounts. The information would be from outside of the company and so demonstrates an attitude of professional skepticism.
A CAE reports directly to the CEO. An auditor discovers a material cash shortage. When questioned, the person responsible explains that the cash was used to cover sizable medical expenses for a child and agrees to replace the funds. Despite the corrective action, the CAE decides to inform management. In this instance, the CAE
A) has organizational independence but not objectivity.
B) has both organizational independence and objectivity.
C) has objectivity but not organizational independence.
D) has neither organizational independence nor objectivity.
has objectivity but not organizational independence.
Rationale
Because the CAE reports directly to the CEO, the IA activity lacks organizational independence. However, by keeping an unbiased mental attitude and reporting the serious offense despite the potentially mitigating circumstances, the CAE is exercising objectivity.
Which is the best example of an internal auditor’s professional skepticism?
A) Noting conditions that indicate compliance with policies and procedures
B) Noting that policies and procedures were revised after the audit was announced
C) Placing emphasis on audit evidence that contradicts other evidence obtained
D) Reviewing the external auditor’s management letter
Placing emphasis on audit evidence that contradicts other evidence obtained
Rationale
Maintaining professional skepticism ensures that internal auditors do not make undue assumptions about the validity of support, such as verbal explanations from management or other information received, without an appropriate level of objective verification of such support. Audit evidence that contradicts other evidence obtained would be the best example of professional skepticism.
When reviewing and evaluating the organizational status of the internal audit activity to increase and improve independence, the governing body should consider which of the following factors?
A) Internal political impact of the reporting lines of the chief audit executive
B) Individual preferences of executive management and the chief audit executive
C) Previous organizational statuses implemented throughout the life of the organization and the relevant purposes for change
D) Governing board’s involvement in decisions to hire or remove the chief audit executive and in drafting and approving an internal audit charter
Governing board’s involvement in decisions to hire or remove the chief audit executive and in drafting and approving an internal audit charter
Rationale
The Practice Guide “Independence and Objectivity” lists five factors to consider in this case:
- Reporting level of the chief audit executive (CAE) within the organization
CAE’s unrestricted access to information throughout the organization and the governing board
- Governing board’s involvement in decisions to hire or remove the CAE and in drafting and approving an internal audit charter
- Role of the governing board in influencing the budget for, and the scope of, internal audit activities and remuneration and retention of the CAE
- Active involvement, oversight, review, and follow-up by the governing board with the internal audit activity
Standard 1100 states, “The internal audit activity must be independent, and internal auditors must be objective in performing their work.” How does The Institute of Internal Auditors interpret independence?
A) As the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal audit responsibilities
B) As the adherence to a socially accepted ethical standard of conduct that establishes trust and thus provides the basis for reliance on the internal auditor’s judgment
C) As an internal control designed to prevent error and fraud by ensuring that at least two individuals are responsible for the separate parts of any task
D) As an unbiased mental attitude that allows internal auditors to perform engagements in such a manner that they believe in their work product and that no quality compromises are made
As the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal audit responsibilities
Rationale
The interpretation of Standard 1100 defines independence as “the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal audit responsibilities in an unbiased manner.”
The best rationale for rotating internal auditors so that different individuals are assigned to consecutive audits of a given auditee is to
A) promote rapid professional development on the part of internal auditors by exposing them to the full range of organizational activities.
B) increase the diligence exercised by internal auditors who know that the quality of their work will be apparent to the next set of internal auditors.
C) avoid the development of bias toward a given auditee.
D) prevent burnout on the part of the internal auditor, which may lead to excessive turnover in the internal audit department.
avoid the development of bias toward a given auditee.
Rationale
Avoiding the development of bias is the primary reason. The alternatives may be desirable, but they are not the basis for the rotation preference.
Which of the following actions would be a violation of auditor independence?
A) Continuing on an audit assignment at a division for which the auditor will soon be responsible as the result of a promotion
B) Reducing the scope of an engagement due to budget restrictions
C) Participating on a task force that recommends standards of control for a new distribution system
D) Reviewing a purchasing agent’s contract drafts prior to their execution
Continuing on an audit assignment at a division for which the auditor will soon be responsible as the result of a promotion
Rationale
An auditor who has been promoted to an operating department should not continue on an audit of that department. If the chief audit executive determines that impairment exists or may be inferred, he or she needs to reassign the auditor.
You have been asked to be a member of a peer review team. In assessing the independence of the internal audit department being reviewed, you should consider which factor?
A) Access to and frequency of communications with the board of directors or the audit committee
B) Scope and depth of organizational objectives for the audit areas under review
C) Education and experience considered necessary when filling vacant audit staff positions
D) Degree to which auditors assume consulting responsibilities
Access to and frequency of communications with the board of directors or the audit committee
Rationale
Education and experience are related to skill, not independence. Communication and assumption of operating duties (not consulting duties) are related to independence. The scope and depth of the audit objectives also reflect on the department’s independence (not the objectives of the audit areas under review).
As part of a company-sponsored award program, an internal auditor is offered an award of significant monetary value by a division in recognition of cost savings that resulted from the auditor’s recommendations. According to the International Professional Practices Framework, what is the most appropriate action for the auditor to take?
A) Inform audit management and ask for direction on whether to accept the gift.
B) Decline the gift and advise the division manager’s superior.
C) Accept the award under the condition that it goes to charity.
D) Accept the gift, since the engagement is already concluded and the report is issued.
Inform audit management and ask for direction on whether to accept the gift.
Rationale
Audit management should always be informed of offers of gifts and consulted for guidance.
An auditor makes a preliminary determination that a major division has been inappropriately capitalizing research and development expense. The audit is not yet completed, and the auditor has not documented the problem or determined that it really is a problem. However, the auditor is informed that the director of internal auditing has received the following communication from the president of the company:
“The controller of Division B informs me that you have discovered a questionable account classification dealing with research and development expense. We are aware of the issue. You are directed to discontinue any further investigation of this matter until informed by me to proceed. Under the confidentiality standard of your profession, I also direct you not to communicate with the outside auditors regarding this issue.”
Which of the following would be an appropriate action for the director to take regarding the questionable item?
A) Immediately notify the external auditors of the problem to avoid aiding and abetting a potential crime by the organization.
B) Inform the president that this scope limitation will need to be reported to the chairperson of the audit committee.
C) Immediately report the communication to The Institute of Internal Auditors and ask for an ethical interpretation and guidance.
D) Continue to investigate the area until all the facts are determined, and document all the relevant facts in the audit workpapers.
Inform the president that this scope limitation will need to be reported to the chairperson of the audit committee.
Rationale
The chief audit executive should communicate the scope limitation to the board. However, it would be appropriate to ensure that the president is aware of this.
In which of the following situations does the internal auditor potentially lack objectivity?
A) A payroll accounting employee assists an internal auditor in verifying the physical inventory of small motors.
B) An internal auditor recommends standards of control and performance measures for contracting with a service organization.
C) Four months after being transferred to the internal audit activity, a former purchasing assistant performs a review of internal controls over purchasing.
D) An internal auditor reviews the procedures for a new electronic data interchange connection for a customer before it is implemented.
Four months after being transferred to the internal audit activity, a former purchasing assistant performs a review of internal controls over purchasing.
Rationale
Per Standard 1120, a conflict of interest is “a situation in which an internal auditor, who is in a position of trust, has a competing professional or personal interest. Such competing interests can make it difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially. A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical or improper act results. A conflict of interest can create an appearance of impropriety that can undermine confidence in the internal auditor, the internal audit activity, and the profession.” In this scenario, the purchasing assistant has a conflict of interest because he or she worked in the purchasing department within the last year. Standard 1130.A1 states that “Objectivity is presumed to be impaired if an internal auditor provides assurance services for an activity for which the internal auditor had responsibility within the previous year.” This presumption of lack of objectivity exists because the auditor may not be wholly objective in auditing his or her previous department and colleagues’ work.
Well-intended policies and training cannot provide total assurance of objectivity. Which is the best way listed for the chief audit executive (CAE) or another individual in a supervisory capacity for the internal audit activity to increase such assurance?
A) Review the results of the internal audit work.
B) Revise the charter to require consulting engagements.
C) Send internal audit customer service surveys to managers who were subject to audits during the year.
D) Use a risk control matrix.
Review the results of the internal audit work.
Rationale
Ongoing assessment can help to ensure that objectivity has not been compromised during an engagement. A best practice is for the CAE, or another individual in a supervisory capacity for the internal audit activity, to review the results of the internal audit work before the related engagement communications are released. A competent review by the CAE may note instances where the auditor may not be objective.
Which would impact an internal auditor’s objectivity?
A) Following up on the recommendations made by internal audit in an audit that concluded nine months ago
B) Providing advice to the new CFO (who started nine months ago) on best practices in an accounts payable department
C) Relying on the work of an external subject matter expert who used to work for the organization as recently as nine months ago
D) Using five years of job experience in a department (transfer from the department was nine months ago) to recommend eliminating several poor procedures
Using five years of job experience in a department (transfer from the department was nine months ago) to recommend eliminating several poor procedures
Rationale
Standard 1130.A1 states that “internal auditors must refrain from assessing specific operations for which they were previously responsible. Objectivity is presumed to be impaired if an internal auditor provides assurance services for an activity for which the internal auditor had responsibility within the previous year.”