Portfolio Management #54 - Analysis of Active Portfolio Management Flashcards
required qualities of a benchmark portfolio
LOS 54.a
- representative - must represent the universe from which the active portfolio manager selects securities
- inexpensively replicable
- predictable - benchweights are known ex-ante (in the future)
expected active return (“value added”)
LOS 54.a
E(RA) = E(RP) - E(RB)
E(RA) = sum(i=1,N) d(wi) * E(Ri), where
d(Wi) = active weight = wPi - wBi
- can be computed ex-ante (forecasted) or ex-post (historically)
- positive active returns generated by overweighting assets with higher expected returns and underweighting those with lower expected returns
risk-adjusted active return
LOS 54.a
risk-adjusted: alpha →aP = RP - ßPRB
All discussion in this reading assumes that systematic risk of benchmark and managed portfolio is the same i.e. ßP = 1, where ßP is portfolios level of systematic risk compared the benchmark B
risk-adjusted: alpha →aP = RP - RB
Sharpe ratio, information ratio
LOS 54.b
Sharpe ratio: SR = (Rp - Rf) / σp
information ratio: IR =(Rp - Rb) / σ(Rp-Rb) = RA / σA
= active return / active risk
qualities and differences between Sharpe and Information ratio
LOS 54.b
Sharpe ratio (SR):
- SR is unaffected by adding cash or leverage to the portfolio
information ratio (IR):
- is affected by adding cash or leverage
- ex-ante IR is always positive
- ex-post IR can be postive or negative
- IR of unconstrained portfolio is unaffected by agressiveness of the active weights
- combining active and benchmark portfolios into one portfolio will have same IR as the active portfolio by itself
- weights to fund with zero systematic risk (e.g. mkt neutral) that has Rf as its benchmark: SR = IR
- investor’s active risk can be reduced by combining active and benchmark portfolio weights in proportion to desired active risk
closet index fund
LOS 54.b
closet index fund - fund claiming to be actively managed but closely tracks its benchmark index
- tends to have same Sharpe (SR) as benchmark
- tends to have very low info ratio (IR) as benchmark
Fundamental Law of Active Management
3 factors that determine the information ratio (IR)
LOS 54.c
information coefficient (IC) - measure of mgr’s skill
- ex-ante: expected correlation between active returns and forecasted active returns
- ex-post: (ICR) measures actual correlation between active returns and expected active returns, usually a small + value (< 0.2)
transfer coefficient (TC) - correlation between actual active weights dWi and optimal active weights dWi*
- TC = for unconstrained portfolios
- TC < 1 w/ constraints: dWi and Wi*will differ
breadth (BR) - number od independent bets (forecasts of active return)