Portfolio Management #53 - Introduction to Multi-factor Models Flashcards
arbitrage pricing theory (APT)
LOS 53.a
APT - describes the equilibrium relationship between expected returns for well-diversified portfolios and their multiple sources of systematic risk.
E(Rp) = RF + ßP1(A1) + … + ßPk(Ak), where
A (lamda) = risk premiums
ß = portfolio factor betas (or “loadings”)
APT assumes there are no market imperfections preventing investors from exploiting arbitrage i.e. extreme long/short positions are permitted
types of multifactor models
LOS 53.d
1. Macroeconomic Factor Models
- surprises in macro variables that explain differences in stock returns
- e.g. interest rates, inflation, business cycle, credit spreads, etc.
2. Fundamental Factor Models
- attributes of stocks that are important in explaining cross-sectional differences in returns
- e.g. B/M, market cap, P/E, leverage, etc.
3. Statistical Factor Models
- Principal components models - factors are portfolios of securities that best reproduce historic return variances
- Factor analysis models - factors are portfolios of securities that best reproduce historic return covariances
- Issue: attaching economic meaning to statistical factors is difficult
macroeconomic factor model
LOS 53.d
Two-factor example:
Ri = E(Ri) + bi1FGDP + bi2FINT + ei
E(Ri) – ex-ante (forecasted) return (no surprises)
bi1 – sensitivity to GDP surprises
FGDP – GDP surprise actual - consensus predicted
bi2 – sensitivity to INT surprises
FINT – interest rate surprise actual - consensus expected
ei – the part of the return that cannot be explained by the model; it represents unsystematic risk related to firm-specific events e.g. a strike, warehouse fire, etc.
fundamental factor model
LOS 53.d
fundamental factor model:
Ri = ai + bi1FP/E + bi2FSIZE + ei, where
R<sub>i</sub> = return for stock i F<sub>P/E</sub> = return assoc. with the P/E factor F<sub>SIZE</sub> = return assoc with the SIZE (mkt cap) factor a<sub>i</sub> = intercept b<sub>i</sub><sub>1</sub> = standardized sensitivity of stock to P/E factor b<sub>i2</sub> = standardized sensitivity of stock to SIZE factor
- factors are returns, not surprises
- intercept != expected return
- factor sensitivities are standardized e.g.:
bi1 = [(P/E)i - avg(P/E)] / σP/E, where
(P/E)<sub>i</sub> = P/E for _stock i_ avg(P/E) = average P/E calculated across _all stocks_ σ<sub>P/E</sub> = std deviation of P/E ratios across _all stocks_
macro vs. fundamental models
LOS 53.d
Macro Factor Fundamental
Model Factor Model
regression time series of cross-sectional
surprises asset returns
factor sens. (ß) regression based standardized from
attribute data
factor rtns. (F) surprises in computed from
macro variables multiple regression
intercept expected return undefined
active return, active risk, information ratio
LOS 53.e
- active return - differences in returns between a managed portfolio and its benchmark:
Active Return = RP - RB
- active risk (aka tracking error, tracking risk) - the standard deviation of the active return:
Active Risk = TE = s(RP - RB)
- information ratio - the active portfolio’s average active return per unit risk:
IR = [avg(RP) - avg(RB)] / s(RP - RB)
multifactor model use for return attribution
LOS 53.f
Fundamental Factor Model
(macro & stat factor models not commonly used for return attribution)
decompose active return into factor return and security selection:
active return = factor return + security selection return
active return = sum(i=1,k)[(ßpk - ßbk) * Ak] + sec. select. rtn.
- use: decompose sources of an asset manager’s return relative to a benchmark
- model uses easily understood factors
- can express investment style choices and security characteristics in detail
risk attribution
LOS 53.f
decompose active risk into two compoments:
- active factor risk - attributable to factor tilts
- active specific risk - attributable to stock selection
σ2(RP - RB) = active risk + active specific risk
active specific risk = sum(i=1,n)[(WPi - WBi)2σ<em>e</em>i2
active factor risk = residual
strategic portfolio decisions
LOS 53.g
Two questions for investors:
- what kind of risk do I have a comparitive advantage in bearing?
- what kind of risk do I have a comparitive disadvantage in bearing?
Examples:
- pension funds have long investment horizons, so less exposed to liquidity risk
- unemployed worker reliant on income is exposed to business cycle risk