POL 3312 review Flashcards

1
Q

How does the traditional budget process work?

A

The fiscal year begins October 1st to September 30th (in theory). In february or march you would have the President’s budget (prepare ones) comes from the office of management and budget presented to congress.
Then it goes to the appropiations committees in the House and Senate where there are 12 subcommittees that each focus on a particular aspect of the budget. The House and senate create their own budget resolutions, which must be negotiated and merged. Ideally the budget process should be done by the end of the summer. Following, floor debates and votes ensue (cannot be filibustered)

  • Congress has no obligation to do anything with the President’s budget.
  • to have filibuster, reconciliation must be classified in the senate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Congress budget if a budget can’t be passed in time?

A

1)continuing resolutions to maintain status quo from last time a budget was passed.
2)senate parlimentarian can classify it as reconciliation.

1) can last a few weeks to 3-4 months, if not passed, you get government shutdown
2) vice president can override just seen as controversial/scandalous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A Major development in the History of the budget process?

A

the 1980 reconcilliation bill which provided that (for the first time) reconcilliation be used at the start of the budget process. Committees were required to forward legislation drafted specifically to reduce spending as required by the first budget resoulution. Presented in budget resolution (defines how where funds are being used in a particualr bill). Must be approved by the House and Senate and include reconcilliation instructions. Then budget committees in both chambers congress create the reconcilliation bill. debate is limited to 20 hours (no filibuster). Once passed, president can sign or veto.

-first introduced under the congressional budget act of 1974
-is deficit altering
check pg. 396 for more info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mandatory spending and examples

A

Cannot be changed through the appropiations process and makes 62% of the budget. Examples include entitlement spending such as: Medicaid, TANF, Medicare, federal spending on student loan programs, federal pensions, etc.

- mandated spending

-only way to increase or decrease spending, is through the regular legislative process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Discretionary spending and examples

A

Makes up approx 37% of the budget and can be controlled through the yearly appropriations process. Examples include: defense (takes up half of the budget), research (medical, nature), transportation and infrastructure, NASA, veteran medical benefits, certain type of aid programs (housing heating subsidies), national parks, the arts, federal law enforcement.

- non-essential spendings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Presidential advantage in foreign policy arena

A

The President has commander in chief power, more centralized power, access to classified information, and sometimes has a public opinion advantage over congress.

1) commander in chief power has been interpreted broadly power over time by the supreme court.
2) Centralized power, allows the power to act quickly and unilaterally
3) classified information never shared with Congress
4) Rally around the flag effect - public supports the president in response to a percieved foreign threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Whats distinctive about the politics of foreign policy in congress

A

1) Involved in parts of the appropriations process having to do with foreign policy
2) Ratification of treaties
3) Confirmation of diplomats/ambassadors (senate only)
4) Declaration of War
5) “Raise and support” armies/navies
6) Regulation of foreign trade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is justice?

A

Giving people what they deserve. There are three ways to conceptualize this concept.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Equality based notion of justice

A

treating everyone the same
ex. Due process rights (in theory), Miranda rights, access to an attorney, protection against cruel and unusual punishment, bill of rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Need based notion of justice

A

Treat people differently based on their needs. Ex. Medicaid, financial aid, welfare, progressive taxation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Contribution based notion of justice

A

Give people more based on them contributing more to society (treat people differently based on contributions to society). ex. Altruistic occupation, student discount, tax deductible, charitable donations, social security, merid based immigration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Market effectiveness

A

Is private delivery (the government leaves the choice as to what people are to do, what goods they are to recieve, and so on, up to the people to choose for themelves, through their exchanges of goods and services with each other Strengths include efficiency, innovation, the and the ability to tailor outcomes more specifically to preferences. Weaknesses include the perpetuation of inequality and the free- rider problem.

-free rider problem - is getting the benefits without even having to pay for them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Authority based notions of effectiveness

A

Is government delivered. A strength includes moral equal distribution and better able to manage negative externalities. Iess innovative and efficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bounded rationality

A

Explains why the top down model does not work. Limits on any politicians ability to create policy in line with the expectations of the top down model.

undermines the content/theory behind the top down model
factors that result in bounded rationality: wealth/being out of touch, polarization, re-election goals, inconsistent facts, time limitations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Top Down model

A

Look at the people at the top of the hierarchy to analyze a policy (highest level of decision-making authority). Explanation of model is dependent on having clear hierarchies of authority, clear directions, and clear understanding of cause and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bottom up model

A

Look at “street level” bureaucrats lower level implements. Look at the people we directly interact with. Based on who you interact with lower in the chain and the idea that the top down model does not work due to lack of accountability, lack of access to the people who create policies, and bounded rationality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Different ways of defining successful policy implementation

A

measure implementation success in terms of its ability to execute faithfully the goals and means present in the statutory mandate.
- loyalty to the prescribed goals. When a policy does not have explicitly stated goals, the choice of standard becomes more difficult, and more general societal norms and values come into play.

18
Q

What is the Ambiguity/conflict matrix

A

is meant to help understand level of amibiguity over the implemation.

ambiguity- how much or how little discretion is given to street level bureaucrats (is there surveillance to make sure they are hitting these targets)
conflict- how much animousity from the general public or polarization does this issue generate.

19
Q

Low conflict/low ambiguity

A

1) is administrative implementation
2) Includes detailed specific instructions about how a policy should be implemeneted
3) surveilances
4) public acceptance
5) agreement on goals w/gov’t

20
Q

High Conflict/low ambiguity

A

Occurs at the federal level
1) controversial w/the public and within the government
2) Policy implementation attempts to control implementation at the federal level.
ex. to sabotage, grant people who are not interested in it.

21
Q

Low conflict/high ambiguity

A

1) experimental implementation
2) for ambiguity, there is a high level of discretion for low-level bureaucrats
3) your experience of how the policy works is highly dependent on the mood of the person you’re asking
4) most in line w/expectations of the bottom up model
5) more open to environmental influences

22
Q

High conflict/high ambiguity

A

Occurs at the state level
1) symbolic implementation
2) coalition strength
3) same dynamic as political implementation but occur at the state level
ex. homeschooling rules, gun control, abortion, and marijuana. (community action agencies)

23
Q

Issue attention cycle

A

Is an agenda setting process; how and why we pay attention to issues at certain times and not other times

  • has 5 stages
  • what has changed is that issues cycle through the issue attention cycle faster than when the original article was published.
24
Q

what is stage 1 of the issue attention cycle?

A

Pre-problem stage: where you have some kind of bad thing in the world or country that exist but is not percieved as a problem for our political system, to solve.

  • is inevitable, unsolvable
  • certain segments of society don’t expereince or percieve the problem
25
Q

what is stage 2 of the issue attention cycle?

A

Alarmed Discovery phase- became aware of the problem

-issue is not new
- proximity, magnitude, timing, presence of an instigator)
- large segments of the population “discover” the problem because something shocked them

26
Q

what is stage 3 of the issue attention cycle?

A

Realizing the cost of significant progress

-financial costs, time, organized opposition
–you hit the brick wall of reality
-optimism of solving the problem dissipates

27
Q

What is stage 4 of the issue attention cycle?

A

Gradual decline of intense public interest

-issue recedes from public imagination
- other issues that are “shiny” and “new” are in stage #2

28
Q

What is stage 5 of the issue attention cycle?

A

Post Problem stage: level of public interest is the same as in stage 1

  • created some type of bureaucracy or law.
  • some type of legacy from making it through the issue attention cycle.
29
Q

Advantaged in social construction of policy design

A

Powerful, positively contructed (generally well-liked) power, wealth, connections etc.)

- basically the best catergory to be in

  • if in this group, you get symbolic and substantive policy benefits
    –get everything in terms of tangible constructive benefits ex. tax break you want, program to benefit target population
    –in terms of symbolic affirmation you get good PR and sublit service
30
Q

Contenders in social construction of policy design

A

You are powerful but unpopular
Here you get substantive benefits but symbolic burdens (deal w/politicians bad mouthing you
ex. get what you want but have to be publicly disparaged.

-negatively constructed

31
Q

Dependents in social construction of policy design

A

Not powerful, positively constructed
ex.children
-get symbolic benefits (ex. photo ops)
-substantive burdens (don’t get what you want)

32
Q

Deviants in social construction of policy design

A

Not powerful, not popular (negatively constructed)
-substantive and symbolic policy burdens

33
Q

What is Kludgeocracy?

A

The idea of non-transparancy/public lacks knowledge and understanding of the issue
-Policies are layered on top of each other haphazardly
- Bureaucratic confusion -> over who is responsible for what

-kludge = is an ill sorted collection of parts political science terms -> unnecessarily complicated

34
Q

Causes of Kludgeocracy

A

1) (main cause) Institutional/structural factors->about our institutions and how they work
ex. multiple veto points -> make it easy to stop things from happening (help perpetuate gridlock)
-house and senate differences (make politics distinct in House and Senate)
2) Inconsistent/contradictory attitudes about gov’t spending/role of gov’t (a lot of members of general public have inconsistent attitudes toward gov’t abstract vs. specific)
3) Kludge industry
- lobbyists
- consultants
- think tanks
- other types of policy experts

1) if you want to clear these veto points, you may have to create a bill unnecessarily complicated.

35
Q

Political consequences of Kludgeocracy

A

The public feels alienated from their governement because of the lack of transparancy

-If you are liberal, kludgeocracy does not work for you
-If conservative, can’t actually cut spending

36
Q

Ex parte merryman

A

In 1861, during the civil war this case contested the president’s power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus during a national emergency. The supreme court rules against the lincoln administration and says the president cannot suspend the writ of habeas corpus. Then in 1863 congress passes the habeas corpus suspension act.

-habeas corpus is an ancient common law writ, issued by a court or judge directing one who holds another in custody to produce the person befire the court for some specified purpose.

37
Q

Ex parte Quirin

A

A case where the supreme court recognizes a new catergory of individuals called enemy combatants. A group of guys were recruited for espionage.
- the legal significance was the supreme court ruled that the detainees did not have the right to a trial by jury.

-do not have to be treated like a prisoner of war
- gives and takes away their rights

38
Q

Korematsu v. United States

A

December 18th 1944, Fred Korematsu had been convicted for having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during world war II. Korematsu is a citizen. On the same day as the korematsu decision, in Ex parte endo, the court sidestepped the constitutionality of internment as a policy but forbade the government to detain a U.S. citizen whose loyalty was recognized by the U.S. government.

-was overturned in trump v. hawaii (2018) (stated in flip note)

39
Q

Clinton vs. the City of New York

A

-Line item veto is unconstitutional because it gave the executive branch the unilateral authority to amend a law without having to go through the legislative process.
-used mostly for budget bills
-clinton has this power from 1966-1998

40
Q

Morrison v. Olsen

A

This case took place in 1988 and focused on the office of the independent counsel, established in 1978, is constitutional
- an office not in control of the executive branch, but congress.
- This was then dissolved in 1999 to create an office in the justice department the president could not control.
- Now to investigate the president, justice department appoints someone to investigate.