pi bonding in phosphazines and onwards // lecture 7 Flashcards
how many pi electrons are there in cyclophosphazine
there’s 6 pi electrons
one from each n and p
describe nitrogen in cyclophosphazines
sp2 hybridised
there’s 1e- in the p orbital as in cyclophosphazine,, each atom gives 1 e-!!
the lone pair is in a sp2 hybrid
describe P in cyclophosphazine
it’s sp3 hybridised
forms 4 bonds and there’s an e- in each hybrid bond. (in the sigma bonding framework)
there’s one more e- tho!! and we want to figure out where this one e- is located
what are the 2 types of pi bonding in cyclophosphazine
there’s in plane pi bonding
out of plane pi bonding
what type of pi bonding was borazine and benzene
out of plane pi bonding!!!
what’s the diff between in plane and out of plane pi bonding
deciding whether to use the P 3d orbitals
or the sigma* orbitals
ON THE P
what do we need to think of when deciding whether to use the 3d or sigma* orbitals on P
the energy
the 3d orbitals are probs too high in energy to be involved in bonding.
sigma* orbitals may be lower in energy and used in any pi bonding used in the ring system.
PF5 hybridisation used and explanation - think about how many orbitals each hybridisation gives and how many bonds the molecule has
so sp3 forms 4 bonds,, and this is one less than PF5 with 5 bonds
so it has to be sp3d1 hybrid
bc we need one more orbital and this must come from d as all of the p and s are used already
PF5,, how many F environments
theres 2 diff environments
axial and equitorial
spin of P
i. = 1/2
spin of f
i = 1/2
if P couples to the axial F’s in PF5 u gettttt
a triplet
bc 2x2x0.5 + 1 = 3
if P couples to the equitorial F’s u get ,,, in PF5
2x3x0.5+1 = 4
a quartet
coupling is stronger and the bonds are thereofre shorter.
so PF5 in nmr givesss
a quartet of triplets
the equitorial split it 3 times (quartet)
then the axisl (diff env) split each peak twice : triplet
what happens in cold temps to PF5
at cold temps u can tell a difference between the axial and equitorial fluorines
in room temp they look like 5 equivalent fluorines.
if the d orbitals in PF5 were too high in energy, how would we explain the bonding w/o them
we say P is sp2 hybridised
3 orbitals bond to the equitorial F’s
left over p orbital to bond to the axial F’s.
the F’s use their s orbital to bond; its a circle like in H
3 MO for FPF,, THE AXIAL ATOMSSSSSSS
bonding
shaded o, shaded p, unshaded p, unshaded o (in phase with each side of the p orbital so theyre in the same phase so theyre bonding)
non bonding: shaded o,,, node at p bc any way u draw it, 1 will be inphase and 1 will be out of phase,, shaded o.
antibonding: shaded o,, unshaded p, unshaded p, shaded o. nodes between the p and the o’s
each bond has 2e-,, so u get 4e- from the FPF so u fill the bonding and non bonding AO’s
by o’s we mean the s orbital but thats the shape of the s orbital so im gonna say o.
PFP is what type of bond
3c-4e
3 atoms but 4e- !!!
normally its 2c-4e-
in PFP,, in PF5,, theres 2e- in bonding and 2e- in nonbonding,, so how many e- are holding the PFP together
only 2e-!!!
bc 2e- are non bonding
bond order = 1/2
so axial bonds are weaker and longer. thats why the coupling constant is smallerrrrrr!! they make the triplet after the quartet.
phosphines are what type of ligands
theyre acceptor ligands
so where do they accept into