philosophy test revision Flashcards

1
Q

IPPC reports that we need to limit the global average temperature to what?

A

1.5C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

To do this by 2030, what percent of CO2 emissions needs to be reduced?

A

45%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To limit warming to 2C, there needs to be how much of a reduction in CO2 emissions?

A

25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What increase are we at present?

A

1.07C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How long do emissions stay in the atmosphere?

A

Most 100 years, some a millennium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mollendorf article? and what does he favour?

A

Justice vs responsibility - favours latter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two main considerations?

A

future generations and todays global poor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a large problem of climate justice?

A

weighing the two previous considerations against the present globally well-off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the South Africa case accuse Israel of?

A

Genocide. Specifically, violating the 1948 Genocide Convention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Was Israels resort to war justified and what did SA think of it?

A

For this course, we’ll assume Israel had a just cause due to being attacked and defending themselves. SA does not argue that Israel did not have a just cause, they argue that Israels response has been genocidal in its intent and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does Israel meet the criteria of jus ad bellum?

A

Even if Israel had a just cause, it does not meet the requirements of right intention, proportionality and necessity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Yoav Gallant, the Israeli minister of defence order?

A

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip”…“We are fighting human animals and are acting accordingly.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Raz Segal and Penny Green argue?

A

“intent in the genocide case against Israel is not hard to prove”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How many statements has the law of Palestine collected that show evidence of Israelis intent for genocide

A

500

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many Palestinians have been displaced in Gaza?

A

85-90%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do the Israeli actions fail to meet the criteria of Jus in bello?

A

They do not discriminate between combatants and noncombatants
They fail to meet the criteria of proportionality and necessity

17
Q

How does the jus ad bellum criteria evaluate the war?

A

As a whole. They weigh whether the likely goods of war are outweighed by the likely evils.

18
Q

What did Judge White say and when?

A

In the US Federal Court Ruling, Judge White stated that, “There is now on the record uncontradicted evidence that there is a genocide in progress.”

19
Q

What does reaching an equitable agreement on climate change require?

A

Historical responsibilities to be acknowledged

20
Q

Who is unlikely to benefit from these ethical considerations?

A

particularly vulnerable countries

21
Q

What are the four principles of allocating burdens associated with climate change?

A

Grandfathering, historical responsibility, carbon intensity, equal per capita emissions

22
Q

What are Kyoto-based agreements based on and what does Kahn believe is a fairer method?

A

production within countries - consumption agreement

23
Q

What are the three broad principles of climate justice?

A

Polluter pays, ability to pay, beneficiary pays

24
Q

What was the quote about market-based solutions?

A

“We need to stop funding the problem and start funding the solution”

25
Realists
Think that once fighting starts, all morality goes out the window (All fairs in love and war)
26
Within the context of international paretianism suggests what?
To be acceptable, any treaty must be such that all states judge themselves better off by it.
27
28
Pacifists
Hold that no morality could license or apply to the horrors of war
29
Just war theory
middle ground. War is over governed by rules. Not a case of anything goes. reflected by international law
30
Traditionalists
legalists, views led by international law, only states, only for national defence
31
revisionists
challenge traditionalists, question moral standing states and permissibility of defence
32
jus ad bellum
justice of resorting to war
33
jus ad bellum
justice of how war is fought
34
zionism
Jewish state in area , must be jewish majority
35