PhiloEd Flashcards

Week 4

1
Q

Born in China in 551 BCE

A

Confucius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Was Plato’s student

A

Aristotle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Believed that education should produce moral subjects

A

Both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Emphasized careful and thoughtful ritual as a way of developing righteous behaviour

A

Confucius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Advocated for the teaching of the following virtues trustworthiness, respect and caring for parents, loyalty, ritual, and bravery

A

Confucius

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Advocated for the teaching of the following virtues: courage, justice, modesty, science, philosophic wisdom, and intuitive reason

A

Aristotle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Socrates wrote The Republic in which he argues for his vision of a just society.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Republic argues that some people are more naturally suited to be leaders of people and they should be educated differently.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Republic argues that the rulers should never lie to their subjects under any circumstances.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Socrates, in The Republic, argues that students should hear only good and moral stories from their teachers and not stories in which the God’s played tricks or lied. →

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The study of what counts as a good reason for what, and why.

A

Logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A/an _______________ provides reasons to support a conclusion.

A

Premise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A/an ________________ should be logically connected to the premise (also spelled premiss).

A

Conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A/an ____________ is a ‘A bit of reasoning’ formed by the connection of premises to conclusions and the drawing of conclusions from premises.

A

Inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If there are no situations in which a premise is true and the conclusion is not, we can say that the inference has _________________. ,

A

Deductive Validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When a conclusion logically follows from a premise, it is considered __________.

A

Valid

17
Q

A/an _______________ provides reasons to support a conclusion.

A

Premise

18
Q

A/an ________________ should be logically connected to the premise (also spelled premiss).

A

Conclusion

19
Q

A/an ____________ is a ‘A bit of reasoning’ formed by the connection of premises to conclusions and the drawing of conclusions from premises.

A

Inference

20
Q

If there are no situations in which a premise is true and the conclusion is not, we can say that the inference has _________________.

A

Deductive Validity

21
Q

When a conclusion logically follows from a premise, it is considered __________.

A

Valid

22
Q

To develop a better understanding of your own perspectives by better understanding what a rationale argument looks like. That is, arguments are studied to.

A

Develop critical thinking / logic

23
Q

To persuade others as to your point of view by arguing your point of view convincingly. That is, arguments are studied to

A

Persuade others

24
Q

To foster consensus and agreement by clearly articulating your perspectives while better understanding others’ perspectives. That is, arguments are studied to

A

nurture consensus

25
Q

Of the three possible reasons Feldman (2009) proposes for teaching students to analyze arguments, which one does he end up proposing is the best reason?

A

To develop rational understanding

26
Q

True or False: According to Feldman (2009), students are increasingly resistant to the idea that questions of morality can be debated as these students would prefer to remain tolerant and open-minded.

A

True

27
Q

True or False: Feldman (2009) believes moral questions–questions about how people ought to live–are the kinds of things one can debate reasonably and are not simply matters of taste.

A

True

28
Q

When someone presents a weaker version of your argument and then attacks that weaker version.

A

→ straw man fallacy,

29
Q

When someone introduces another issue that is not really related to your argument, often as a rebuttal.

A

→ red herring

30
Q

When someone tries to provide support for a conclusion but that support can only be believed if one already accepts the conclusion, for example, “the bible is the word of god because the bible says so”.

A

→ begging the question

31
Q

“A critical thinker is one who is appropriately moved by reasons, and […] critical thinking is BLANK which appropriately reflects the power and convicting force of reasons.”

A

Thinking

32
Q

Inquiry is “the activity of investigating matters relevant to responsible

A

Belief, judgment and action.

33
Q

Inquiry is in this basic way univocal. It involves the creation and BLANK examination of reasons and their power to warrant hypotheses;

A

Critical

34
Q

and it results, ideally, in [], [] and [] which conform to the results of such [critical] examination.”

A

Belief, judgment and action

35
Q
A