Pharmacodynamics Flashcards
why is the “magic range” of drug MW value between 100 and 1,000
too large, drug has a hard time getting around in the body
too small, drug has too many off-target interactions and binding is too loose because it is tiny (trouble with specificity)
what is the intrinsic response of antagonists
none - they only block action of agonists by binding to receptors, they do not produce any pharmacological response
_____ determines the quantitative relationship between drug dose and pharmacological response
what 2 factors dictate this relationship
RECEPTORS determine quantitative relationship between drug dose and pharmacological response
dictated by:
1. number of drug-bound receptors (dependent on affinity)
2. total number of receptors (determines maximal effect)
number of drug-bound receptors is determined by ______
equilibrium dissociation constant, Kd
measure of affinity of drug for receptor
[remember that LOW Kd = HIGH affinity]
how do you describe the quantitative relationship between drug effect (E) and drug dose (D)
E = [D]xEmax
————-
[D] + EC50
EC50 = effective drug concentration that produces 50% of max effect
when are semilog plots of E (effect) vs log[D] (drug concentration) useful?
allows for greater range of drug concentrations to be examined
shape of curve changes from hyperbolic to sigmoidal
EC50 is found at inflection point of curve (where slope stops increasing, starts decreasing)
Emax is found at plateau (just like in hyperbolic curve)
drug potency is determined by ___ value
low EC50 = HIGHER potency
less drug required to produce desired effect
also minimizes potential for adverse effects to arise (because less drug is needed)
drug efficacy is determined by ____ value
HIGH Emax = HIGH efficacy
drugs that elicit higher max effect are more efficacious
potency vs efficacy
potency: how much drug do I need to elicit a response? (depends on EC50)
efficacy: what is the largest response this drug can elicit? (depends on Emax)
by definition, a partial agonist has lower _____ than a full agonist
partial agonists are ALWAYS less EFFICACIOUS (Emax) than agonists
however, potency (EC50) may be the same or more
because antagonists have no intrinsic activity, how do you measure their impact?
plot graded dose-response curve of an agonist in the presence of differing concentrations of antagonist
log[D] on x-axis of dose-response curve will ALWAYS ALWAYS be an agonist**
2 types of antagonist and their definitive principle (in pharmacology)
competitive - reversible (and can be overcome by high concentrations of agonist)
non competitive - irreversible
what is a characteristic limitation of competitive antagonists
effect is reversible, and with a high enough concentration of agonist present antagonist can be overcome
in a graded dose-response curve of an agonist in the presence of a competitive antagonist, what parameter will NOT change
Emax will NOT change - inhibition can be overcome by increasing concentration of agonist (efficacy is unchanged)
EC50 will increase, making the agonist appear less potent
match:
beta-blocker
proton pump inhibitor
competitive antagonist
non-competitive antagonist
beta-blocker: competitive antagonist of NE/E
proton pump inhibitors (Prilosec): non competitive/irreversible antagonist of proton pump in stomach lining, preventing acidification of gut