PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY Flashcards
What does personality mean in psychology?
- individuality and how individuals differ from one another through psychological attributes
- it is not seen to link with abilities such as intelligence/our cognitions/mood
Prentice 1990 - ‘describe yourself’
found that people mainly describe themselves through personality traits (25%) - perhaps this is because they are seen more important than their abilities
Rentfrow et al 2011 and musical tastes
- musical tastes are a primary model of self expression; a way to express your individuality
- factors
- people have stereotypes of people with different taste and these involve personality features e.g. Classical music likers = are often introverted or calm
define taxonomy
CLASSIFYING SOMETHING
Lexical approach
is a way of finding a scientific taxonomy of personality which assumes that important distinctions for describing people are incorporated in language however Allport and Odbert showed that language varies through cultures
- cattle narrowed down their findings using the FACTOR ANALYSIS and came up with basic dimensions of personality
- Donald Fiske reduced Cattell’s workes to the BIG 5 which is a taxonomy of personality; Openness to experience, Conscientiousness, Extraversion , Agreeableness and Neuroticism (O.C.E.A.N.)
- Evidence of these 5 factors being universal/cross cultural - they have predicted important outcomes such as longevity and divorce.
OPPOSITION OF THE LEXICAL APPROACH
although the Big 5 derives from the lexical approach some argue that the Questionnaire method is a better way of identifying a taxonomy system for personality traits; e.g. Eysenck
-He developed a two factor model –> extraversion and neuroticism and argued that they are grounded within our biology (recreating Hippocrates and the humours)
lexical approach VS. questionnaire approach
lexical = big 5, but it was found that it was not universal through cultures as for example extraversion and agreeableness is better described as dominance and love in filipino - a better approach would be the indigenous approach which is creating a personality structure from the culture itself questionnaire = 3 factor model
what are traits?
ways in which behaviour is consistent across situation
Situationism
claims that behaviour is not consistent across situations and what drives peoples behaviour is the situation that they are in and what it requires
-EXAMPLE STUDY - Hartshorn and May
however this was criticised because there is need for an interactionist view that recognises traits and situations together
Jung VS eysenck
proposed a concept of TYPES - some personality variation is best described through categories and types which appear to be dimensional and either one OR the other (opposite of eysenck)
what are values?1
different to traits because they are in your head
-“concepts or beliefs…about desirable end states or behaviours…that transcend specific situations…and guide selection or evaluation of behaviour and events” - Schwartz and Bilsky
-they are cognitive, linked to motives and desires - learned
-Schwartz developed a model of 10 value types replicated in 60 countries
eg. universalism, benovlence, conformity, tradition, security, power etc
EXAMPLE; personality profile of athletes - different big 5 personality traits but highly similar value profiles
Character strengths
-environmentally shaped
-contribute to fulfillment in life
-are valued in their own right
-do not diminish anyone in society when exercised
VIA taxonomy of character strenghts; wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance and transcendence
genetics to explain personality?
- 9% of base pairs in our DNA are identical and for the 0.01% known as our polymorphisms these account to our differences in our traits/values/beliefs and interests
- 3 ways to determine how much we alter in genetic variation; family studies, twin studies and adoption studies
family studies of genetic variation of personality
1st degree relatives and 2nd degree relations –>if you resemble the personality of your 1st degree relatives more than it can be said that genetic similarity must explain your personality similarity
HOWEVER; similar environments
twin studies for genetic variation of personality
MZ twins are 100% identical and DZ are only 50%; if there is greater resemblance for MZ twins in personality this MUST explain genetic contribution on personality
– HOWEVER although environments are same for the twins MZ twins may be treated in a more ‘identical’ fashion so perhaps unrepresentative?
Adoption studies for genetic variation of personality
compare resemblance of adopted children to adoptive parents and biological parents
BUT - adoption must occur early/ can argue that biological parent provides prenatal environment as well as genes
several genes have been identified to be related to our personality
1–> novelty seeking and dopamine sensitivity gene
2–>neuroticism and seretonin
EXAMPLE - caps 2003 showed that stress doesn’t always make one depressed, unless they have the variant of the gene
Brain functioning on personality
Eysenck said that extraversion is a fact of the human brain
- if you have high level of critical arousal you will b introverted as you do not need to fufill this and visa versa
- Neuroticism and limbic system reactivity
- -> Grays theory is the alternative theory
- there are some links between Big 5 and brain structure volumes
Brain functioning; chemicals
-Personality factors may be associated with neurotransmitter concentrations in the brain eg extraversion and dopamine levels, neuroticism and norepinephrine levels and constraint and serotonin levels
Hormones on personality
– there is evidence that personality is influenced by prenatal exposure to sex hormones i.e men then to have longer ring finger than pointer finger (2D:4D)
- EXAMPLE STUDY – examined reactive aggression in women (Benderlioglu and nelson 2004)
- Paritcipants asked to raise money for fictitious charity by making calls
- Calls went to kind but non donating or hostile confederates
- Hostility assessed by how hard phone was put down and by tone of follow-up letter – women with lower 2D:4D were more hostile