Personality And Consequential Outcomes Flashcards
why might personality predict life outcomes?
- direct effects - from general to specific
- indirect effects - mediation, extraversion predicts likelihood of winding up in accidents, because more likely to put you in situations where accidents occur eg, drinking at parties
- interactive/conditional effects - person x environment
what is the lexical hypothesis?
important characteristics will over human history be coded in lang.
how do we measure prediction of achievement?
- job performance
- occupational success
- educational achievement
what did schmidt and hunter 1998 find re C and job performance?
C had correlation with job performance of 0.31 (relatively large in this field) across a range of jobs
integrity tests are a blend of which big 5 traits?
C and A
when schmidt and hunter combined cog abilities with integrity tests what r value did they get?
same for when they combined cog abilities with C
r = 0.65; r = 0.60
what did kaufman et al 2015 find re creative achievement
- intellect reflects engagement with semantic info (sciences)
- openness reflects engagement with perceptual info (arts)
what results did propat 2009 get for correlations of Big 5 and GPA
Cog ability: .25
C: .22
Openness/intellect: .12
A: .07
why/how might personality predict achievement (job)
- direct effects (things that are valued in work place, C people are just better at these things)
- indirect effects (choosing pathways that better fit ones personality
- interactive effects (E’s may respond better to interpersonal challenges of management than N’s)
what is a theory behind why E’s might do better in sales and management roles?
they respond better to rewards
what are the broad predictors of achievement for each b5 trait?
C: general achievement
E: achievement in areas like sales, management, customer service
O: educational engagement, occupational success, creative achievement
A: customer service
N: (low N) performance
what did martin et al 2007 find re longevity
1200 people assessed over 7 decades
C was an indicator of likelihood of death as 15% difference in probability of still being alive when high on C or low on C
what did C predict that could be linked to increased probability of living longer? bogg and roberts 2004
less alcohol use: less drug use: less unhealthy eating: less risky driving: less risky sexual behaviour: basically more likely to engage in health promoting behaviours
what did armon and toker 2013 find re health check ups 7 years later?
C was s positive predictor of returning
E and O were negative predictors of returning
N was curvilinear (low and high on N would not, while moderate N people did return)
positive psych wellbeing has been correlated with longevity… why might this be?
ratings of higher wellbeing tend to be related with high E and low N, maybe there is indirect things at play here