Performance- discharge of contract Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the three options to discharge a contract?

A

-acceptance (no more discussion needed).
-Performance
-Breach of contract (actual and anticipatory)
-Frustration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by discharge by performace?

A

-if both parties have complied fully with all of the terms of the contract, their obligations are at an end.
-ended contract via discharge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two rules to ensure discharge by performance?

A
  1. Must be exact
  2. Must be complete
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case goes with exact performance?

A

Re Moore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Re Moore & landauer?

A

-Tinned fruit- wrong size box
-performance not exact = no perf
-entitled to reject.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case goes with complete performance?

A

Cutter v Powell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cutter V Powell?

A

-tried to claim proportions of husbands wage from ship when died
-contract was to do whole journey- no money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How has the strict rule of exact and complete been modified?

A
  1. Substanital performance
  2. Partial performance
  3. Late performance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is meant by substantial performance?

A

-Has a party done substantially what was required under the contract?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who decides what is meant by substantial?

A

-The court, on the facts of the case.
-most of the work must be complete.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When does substantial performance tend to happen?

A

-large contracts where little things have not been performed correctly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which cases come under substantial performance?

A
  1. Hoenig V Isaacs
  2. Bolton V Mahadeva
  3. Young V Thames property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hoenig V Issacs?

A

-quoted £750 to decorate room
-£55 of minor defects

-substantially completed on a financial basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bolton V Mahadeva?

A

-heating system for £560
-defective +fumes+ £170 repair

-not substantially completed on a financial basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by a Quantum Meruit basis?

substantial performance.

A

-courts use their discression to make fair decision
-as much as it is worth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Young V Thames Properties?

A

-didn’t resurface car park to specified depth
-minor defecr- contractor entitled to payment for work- money saved by not resurfacing to right depth.

17
Q

What is meant by partial performance?

A

-if parties agree to end contract before it is completed
-+work done is less than substantial
-agreement to do less work for reduced fee.

BOTH PARTIES MUST AGREE.

18
Q

How will the payment be calculated for partial performance?

A

-according to quantum meruit
-‘as much as deserved’

19
Q

Which case goes with partial peformance?

A

Sumpter V Hedges

20
Q

Sumpter V Hedges

A

-part built house+stables
-claimed for 1/2 said accepted part-performance
-not entitled- not accepted.

21
Q

How will the payment be calculated for partial performance?

A

-according to quantum meruit
-‘as much as deserved’

22
Q

What is meant by late performance?

A

-based on delays that constitute a substantial failure to perform
-where time is of ‘the essence’

23
Q

Examples of where time may be considered ‘of the essence’?

A

E.g. if you order a birthday cake, it should arrive on the day of the birthday.

24
Q

Which case goes with late performance?

A

Charles V Rickards V Oppenheim

25
Q

Charles V Rickards V Oppenheim?

A

-Car- delay of 3 months- not ready then
-said after 4 weeks he would cancel- after weeks right to reject
-‘time became of the essence’

26
Q

Extra: for discharge by late performance?

A

1- time of the essence
2- completion of contract critical
3- one party has failed to perform on time and the other has insisted on a new date for completion.