Percy Bysshe Shelly - Love's Philosophy Flashcards
What is the poem about?
- The poet is attempting to convince a love interest to be with him romantically by giving examples of how everything in nature is connected and how he believes it is God’s law.
Give a brief synopsis of the poem
- Initially, Shelly declares “facts” about examples of couples in nature and then asks why he is not in a relationship
- In the second stanza, Shelley fixates on examples of physical intimacy in nature and then asks why he doesn’t have the same experience
When was Percy Bysshe Shelly alive?
1792-1822
When was the poet written?
1820
Context regarding Percy Bysshe Shelley:
- Born into a very wealthy family which attained a small noble rank in 1086
- Attended Eton and Oxford
- Expelled from Oxford as he contributed to a pamphlet about Atheism, controversial concept in the 1800s
- Due to Shelley (and Byron) dying early, Romantic poetry is usually associated with intense youthful passion.
“The fountains mingle with the river”
- Shelley establishes the theme of nature from the outset which is common for Romantic poetry
- Idea of fountains mingling with rivers evokes passive images implying that is only natural for them to be together
- Personification to draw parallels between what happens in nature and his own desire to be with his love interest
“And the rivers with the Ocean,”
- The ocean is a typically feminised motif in poetry - by including this image, the speakers awe at the woman he loves could be inferred
“The winds of Heaven mix for ever”
- Along with “river” (Line 1) and “forgiven” (Line 11) they are half rhymes - disrupts the regular ABAB and demonstrates how the couple aren’t together
“With a sweet emotion;”
- Connotations of “sweet” imply that the speaker experiences tender affection
- Personification implies that nature benefits from the connectedness of everything
“Nothing in the world is single;”
- The line sums up the narrator’s argument, reinforcing the poems persuasive structure. T* he short clause makes it feel as though the point must be true and is inarguable.
“All things by a law divine”
- Links back to the title, in which Shelley compares his lack of love with a philosophical argument, and is paradoxically reducing the massive illogical concept of love to a straightforward step-by-step plea
- Shows how he believes that it is God’s will that everything in nature mingles together
“In one another’s being mingle -“
- Repetition of “mingle” emphasises how everything in nature is united
- Dash creates a pause which emphasises the rhetorical question at the end of the stanza
“Why not I with thine?”
- Here, the reader learns for the first time that the speaker is experiencing unrequited love, and the monosyllabic nature of this line adds to its impact, making the stanza more persuasive
- First time pronoun “I” is referenced, suggests the speaker is relying on the impact of natural imagery to convince the woman he wants to be in a relationship in that she should be with him
- In both stanzas, the first 6 or 7 lines are confident assertions of things the narrator believes to be true, the rhetorical questions at the end of each stanza create a tonal shift which shows that he is confused that his love interest won’t reciprocate his affections.
“See the mountains kiss high Heaven,”
- Pathetic fallacy and assonance suggests how natural and simple it would be for them to be together
- Physical language hints his frustration that he cannot “kiss” or “clasp” his love interest
“And the waves clasp one another;”
- “Clasp” has highly sensual connotations, soft sibilance in it denote a loving intimate connection, and continuing semantic field of embrace
“No sister-flower would be forgiven”
“If it disdain’d its brother”
- The narrator claims that the love interest’s coldness towards him goes against God’s law and is therefore sinful and unforgivable.
- “Disdain’d” confirms the suggestion that the love interest has previously rejected the narrator.
- Innocent images (brother, sister-flower) so may imply the young nature of the relationship, or perhaps suggests the relationship is natural and should not be forced - destined to be together
“And the sunlight clasps the earth,”
“And the moonbeams kiss the sea -“
- “Sunlight” and “moonbeams” form antithesis, shows the overwhelming nature of the speaker’s desire, he is passionate both night and day, also shows that everything is connected, even the Sun and Moon - not just nature on earth
- Repeated use of “And” highlights how many examples he can think of to demonstrate nature’s unity to the love interest
“What is all this sweet work worth”
- The narrator questions the point of the world if his love interest won’t reciprocate his feelings for her, implying that love gives life meaning - can be seen as hyperbolic, and the over dramatised reaction may only be to persuade her.
- “Sweet work worth” is difficult to say, implying that the speaker is beginning to feel despondent about the lack of reciprocity of his love
“If thou kiss not me?”
- The final line of each stanza is monosyllabic, with only five syllables, which increases the rhetorical questions’ impact, just as they’re separated from the rest of the poem, the narrator is separated from his love interest.
- The use of anastrophe in the final line of the poem rearranges the word order so that “me” is the final line of the poem, this forces the love interest to acknowledge and focus on him and his feelings at the end of the poem.
- Poem culminates with a question so the listener is provided no catharsis.
- Shelley’s use of questions is also indicative of the persuasive style of the poem
- Monosyllables are also used here to reinforce the speaker’s argument; “kiss” is repeated throughout the poem to emphasise the speaker’s desire
Describe the perspective the poem uses
- Written in first person as Shelley is able to speak from experience
- Narrative perspective also adds to intimacy of the sentiment expressed by the speaker
Describe the structure of the poem regarding philosophical argument
- In each stanza, Shelley builds up evidence as if he is constructing a philosophical argument and ends with a rhetorical question.
- In the first stanza he shifts from the declarative “The fountains mingle with the river” to the rhetorical “Why not I with thine?”. * The question is in contrast with the rest of the poem and acts to highlight the difference between what Shelley has just described and his actual situation.
Describe the structure of the poem regarding the line lengths
- The tight structure is to be persuasive, using most of each stanza to build evidence supporting his argument.
- He uses short lines at the end of the stanzas to use rhetorical questions which emphasises the contrast between nature and the narrator.
Describe the structure of the poem regarding repetition
- Repetition is used to reiterate and emphasise how nature connects with everything else.
- Shelley repeatedly uses the anaphora of “And the” (rivers, waves, sunlight, moonbeams) - could be used to constantly imply the importance of nature in a romantic and sexual relationship.
- Throughout the poem, Shelley employs lexis from the semantic field of embrace.
e.g. “mingle”, “mix”, “kiss”, “clasp” are repeated throughout different stanzas which emphasises the fact that the speaker wishes he had an intensely intimate and physical relationship with the woman he is addressing in the poem and stresses the importance of physical togetherness.
Describe the form and meter of the poem regarding its length
- The poet is short and simple, which suggests that the poet believes what he is saying to be simple truths.