Peers Flashcards

1
Q

Two or more persons who are operating at similar levels of behavioral complexity - social equals

A

Peer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

___ ____’s work with rhesus monkeys.Both groups socially abnormal. Mother only avoided peers and were aggressive through adulthood. Peer only clung to peers and mutually attached to one another. Aggressive outside of peer group, highly agitated over minor stresses.

A

Peer vs. Parental Influence: Harlow’s Monkey Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sociability in ____. Babies are interested in other babies….babbling, smiling, offering toys, gesturing

A

Sociability in infancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sociability in ____. View peers as responsive toys…coordinated interactions with age mates… play has strong verbal component

A

Sociability in toddlerhood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sociability in ____. Nonsocial play, parallel play, associative play, and cooperative play. Parten (1932)

A

Sociability in preschool

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sociability in ____. “Peer groups”: (1) interact on reg basis, (2) define sense of belonging, (3) formulate norms or appearance and behavior, (4) develop structure and organization.

A

Sociability in middle childhood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sociability in ____. Cliques: small group (2-8) of friends who share common interests and activities.

crowds: large, reputation ally-based peer group who may or may not interact on a regular basis

A

Sociability in adolescence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Parten (1932) playing alone or observing or not playing at all

A

Nonsocial activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Parten (1932) playing near other children but not interacting but copying actions

A

Parallel play

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Parten (1932) children are interested in other people but not in coordinating play together, interaction, but actives aren’t in sync

A

Associative play

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Parten (1932) child is interested in the people playing and the activity they are partaking in. Organized play, participants have assigned roles

A

cooperative roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Small group (2-8) of friends who share common interests and activities

A

Cliques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Large, reputationally-based peer group who may or may not interact on a regular basis

A

Crowds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“name three kids in your class you would most like to play with”

“name three kids in your class you would least like to play with”

The kids know themselves best

Most reliable version of data

A

Sociometric Procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sociometric categories. Rated by many children as someone they would most like to spend time with.

A

Popular

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sociometric categories. Rated by many children as someone they would least like to spend time with

A

Rejected

17
Q

Sociometric categories. Not mentioned by many children on the survey

A

neglected

18
Q

Sociometric categories. Some children would like to spend time with them, others would not like to

A

controversal

19
Q

Social ____. Do people notice you?

____ = liking score + disliking score

A

Social impact. Do people know you?

20
Q

Social _____. Do your peers like you as a person?

____ = liking score - disliking score

A

Social Preference. Do your peers like you as a person?

21
Q

Behavioral aspects of ____. Calm, outgoing, friendly, initiate interactions, kind, solve disputes

A

Popular

22
Q

Behavioral aspects of ____. Passive, shy, lack on social assertiveness, lack social skills

A

neglected

23
Q

Behavioral aspects of ____: – –. Physical or relational aggression towards peers. Interpret hostility in other’s behaviors, overestimate social standing

A

Aggressive Rejected

24
Q

Behavioral aspects of ____: – – socially awkward and anxious. Aware of their social standing, withdraw from peers, most likely victims of bullying

A

Withdrawn Rejected

25
Q

Why are children – – or – by their peers?

Parents (sensitive=accepted parents, hostile/uninvolved = disliked)

Temperament (irritable = problematic relations)

Cognitive skills (pop have good role taking skills and are higher acdademically)

Attractiveness (beauty is good, body build)

A

Why Are Children Accepted, Neglected, or Rejected by Peers?

26
Q

AKA Bullying.

One child attempts to physically or psychologically harm another child who is either weaker or perceived as weaker

Results in one child becoming the victim in the relationship

A

Peer Victimization

27
Q

Aggressive (put themselves into situations that cause others to bully them)

Emotions (Anger, emotionally reactive)

Perhaps children like to watch other children “blow up”

Provocation?

A

Why are some kids chronic victims

28
Q

Buffer effect (one supportive friend can drastically reduce the negative effects of victimization, problematic family environments, rejection)

Teaching Social Problem-Solving

Prepare for Adult Romantic Relationships (teaches intimacy, self-disclosure, caring and compassionate attitudes)

A

Advantages of friendships

29
Q

Findings – (19–) Antisocial confirmity to peers increases from 3rd-9th grade then declines, peaks in 9th grade.

Related to the child’s evaluations of those behaviors

Relationship between age change:
3rd grade: side with parents over peers
6th: peer influence increase with no change in parent/child conflict
9th: opposition between parens and peers is stronger
11th-12th: peer conformity decreases, some opposition between parent and peer conformity but not much

A

Conformity to Peers


Berndt (1979) findings

30
Q

Ingredients for successful adolescents are NOT the ingredients for successful adults!

A

High School Reunion effect