Patrik Flashcards
name 7 reinsurance loss reserving problems
Patrik - Reinsurance
1-claim report lags to reinsurers are longer
2-persistent upward development of most claim reserves
3-reporting patterns differ greatly
4-industry statistics aren’t very useful
5-reports to reinsurers lack important info
6-data coding and IT systems problems
7-ratio of adequate loss reserve to surplus is greater for a reinsurer
what is the reporting pipeline for reinsurance losses?
Patrik - Reinsurance
1-claim is reported to cedant
2-claim filters through cedant’s report system to its reinsurance department
3-claim travels through an intermediary before finding its way to the reinsurer
4-claim appears in reinsurer’s claim system
what are two reasons (besides the lengthy reporting pipeline) that cause claim report lags to reinsurers to be longer?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
1-serious claims tend to be under-reserved (modal reserving practices) -> extends reporting pipeline because it takes longer for claims to exceed reinsurance threshold
2-mass tort claims (e.g. asbestos-related injuries) may have extreme delays in discovery or in reporting to the cedant
what 3 things cause persistent upward development of most claim reserves?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
1-economic and social inflation
2-tendency of claims adjusters to reserve at modal values
3-tendency to under-reserve ALAE
what are 5 ways claims reporting patterns can differ?
Patrik - Reinsurance
1-reinsurance line 2-type of contract 3-specific contract terms 4-cedant 5-intermediary
why are differing claims reporting patterns a problem for reinsurance loss reserving?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- exposures tend to be heterogeneous
- traditional reserving methods require large volumes of homogeneous data
- even with large amounts of similar exposure, low frequency and length report lag may cause extreme fluctuation in historical loss data
what reinsurance industry statistics are available?
Patrik - Reinsurance
every two years, the Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) publishes a summary of casualty excess reinsurance loss development statistics
what should be considered when using reinsurance industry statistics?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- heterogeneity of exposure
- reporting differences by company
- incomparable Schedule P’s because the Annual Statement does not properly categorize reinsurance exposures into homogeneous groups
- most reinsurer’s loss reserves are aggregated into one LOB (excess casualty)
- ISO LD statistics by line are not applicable to reinsurance reserving w/o significant adjustments to the data - these may increase the indicated growth
what information might the reports received by the reinsurer be lacking?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- only summary claim information instead of detailed (or insufficient detail)
- data reported by CY/UWY instead of AY
what can cause data coding and IT systems problems?
Patrik - Reinsurance
- heterogeneity in coverage
- reporting requirements
- business grows faster than ability of reinsurers’ data systems to handle and produce reports requested by marketing, u/w, claims, accounting, and actuarial staffs
how is the larger ratio of loss reserve to surplus problematic?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
-many managers refuse to believe magnitude of loss liabilities coming from the actuary (especially with such a long tail)
what does the U.S. Tax Reform Act of 1986 require?
Patrik - Reinsurance
-discounting of loss reserves for income tax purposes
why might the U.S. Tax Reform Act of 1986 be a problem?
Patrik - Reinsurance
- discounting losses means insurers no longer have an implicit risk margin built into their loss reserve estimates
- buffer flows into profits and is taxed sooner, decreasing assets and increasing companies’ risk level
what are the six components of reinsurer’s loss reserve?
Patrik - Reinsurance
1-case reserves reported by ceding companies
2-reinsurer’s additional reserves on individual claims
3-actuarial estimate of future development on components 1 and 2
4-actuarial estimate of pure IBNR
5-discount for future investment income
6-risk load
in what form/basis are case reserves reported by the ceding companies?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
individual claim basis (excess contracts) or in bulk summary form (proportional contracts)
what is IBNER?
Patrik - Reinsurance
actuarial estimate of future development on the reported and additional case reserves
what is the discount for future investment income component of a reinsurer’s loss reserve?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
credit for future investment income on assets supporting certain types of claims, such as WC permanent total cases, auto PIP annuity claims, and medical professional liability claims
what is the risk load component of a reinsurer’s loss reserve?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- adverse deviation loading, used to keep reserves at a conservative level
- sometimes loaded implicitly through conservative assumptions, sometimes accounted for explicitly
- more important for insurers due to long-tailed nature of their exposure
what is the first step in the reinsurer’s procedure for setting reserves?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
partition the portfolio into reasonably homogeneous exposure groups, with a relatively consistent mix of business over time
what are the four highest-priority segments by which the reinsurance portfolio might be partitioned?
(in order of priority)
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- LOB: property, casualty, etc.
- Type of contract: facultative, treaty, finite
- Type of reinsurance cover: quota share, surplus share, excess per-risk, excess per-occurrence, aggregate excess, cat, etc.
- Primary LOB - for casualty
what are the four lower-priority segments by which the reinsurance portfolio might be partitioned?
(in order of priority)
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- Attachment point - for casualty
- Contract terms: flat-rated, retro-rated, sunset clause, share of loss adjustment expense, claims-made vs. occurrence coverage, etc.
- Type of cedant: small, large, or E&S (excess & surplus)
- Intermediary
what are other considerations regarding EXPOSURES when partitioning reinsurance loss data?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- within each category, exposure should be refined by contract type (treaty vs. facultative) and retention type (per-occurrence vs. aggregate excess)
- unique claims types should be separate (e.g. asbestos, pollution)
what are other considerations regarding TREATY CASUALTY exposures when partitioning reinsurance loss data?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
- treaty casualty excess exposure should be segregated by attachment point range and by primary LOB (different report lags)
- treaty casualty proportional exposure should be similarly segregated (share of ground-up or share of excess?)
what are other considerations regarding FACULTATIVE exposures when partitioning reinsurance loss data?
(Patrik - Reinsurance)
facultative casualty exposure should be split between primary programs (ground-up exposure) and non-primary programs (excess exposure)