Meyers Flashcards
what are three explanations for why models do not accurately predict the distribution of outcomes for test data?
(Meyers)
- insurance process is too dynamic to be captured in a single model
- other models that better fit the data
- data used to calibrate the model is missing crucial information needed to make a reliable prediction
what are two examples of ‘crucial information’ needed to make a prediction that models might be missing?
(Meyers)
- changes in claim processes
- changes in the way the underlying business is conducted
what is the underlying assumption for all of the models mentioned in the paper?
(Meyers)
there have not been any substantial changes in the insurer’s operations
how does Meyers test the Mack model?
Meyers
- selected 200 incurred loss triangles
- used Mack model to calculate mean & SD
- fit logN distr. with mean & SD that matched those produced by Mack model
- converted actual outcome into a percentile of the logN distribution
what fact do the validation tests of the Mack model leverage?
(Meyers)
percentiles from each insurer should be uniformly distributed
what should we expect from the histogram test?
Meyers
-if percentiles are uniformly distributed, height of the bars should be equal
(not perfectly level with small sample)
what do p-p plot and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests test for?
Meyers
test for statistical significance of uniformity
what do we expect a p-p plot/KS test to look like?
Meyers
- p-p (predicted percentiles) plot expect to be along a 45-degree line
- K-S creates a ‘boundary’ around that line
when do we reject the hypothesis that a set of percentiles is uniform, under the K-S test?
(Meyers)
when K-S statistic is GREATER than its critical value
if the actual outcomes fall into the smaller and large percentiles of the distributions produced by the Mack model more often than the middle percentiles, what can we conclude?
(Meyers)
conclude that Mack model produces a distribution that is light-tailed
if the Mack model produces larger tails, what can we expect to see on a histogram test?
(Meyers)
-outcomes falling in the largest percentile would shift toward the middle percentiles
what does an “S” shape in a p-p plot mean?
Meyers
-model is light tailed because actual outcomes are falling into percentiles that are lower than expected in the left tail, and higher than expected in the right tail
what would a backwards “S” shape in a p-p plot imply?
Meyers
-Mack model is heavy-tailed
when testing the bootstrap ODP model and Mack models, how did actual outcomes compare to predicted outcomes?
(Meyers)
actual outcomes occurred in the lower percentiles of the model distributions more often
what was the result of testing the bootstrap ODP and Mack models?
(Meyers)
-implication that both models produce expected loss estimates that are biased high when modeling paid losses
what is the denominator used to calculate the expected value of percentiles for a p-p plot?
(Meyers)
n+1
what is the denominator used to calculate the expected value for a K-S test?
(Meyers)
n
what does it mean for models to be biased high?
Meyers
- more of the actual outcomes will fall in lower percentiles because the model distributions are shifted too far to the right
- if they shifted back to the left -> not so many outcomes falling into the left tails
what does a K-S D statistic greater than the critical value indicate?
(Meyers)
-uniformity is not present in the model
what differences were there between model results for paid and incurred losses?
(Meyers)
incurred: distr. predicted by Mack model has light tails
paid: distr. predicted by Mack and ODP models tend to produce expected loss estimates that are too high
what are possible reasons for the Mack and ODP bootstrap model testing results?
(Meyers)
- insurance loss environment has experienced changes not yet observable
- there are other models that can be validated
what causes light tails in Mack’s model for incurred loss data?
(Meyers)
Mack model underestimates the variability of the predictive distribution
what are two ways to increase the variability of the predictive distribution?
(Meyers)
- treat the level of the AY as random [Mack model multiplies age-to-age factors by last observed loss -> last observed loss acts are fixed level parameters)
- allow for correlation between AY (Mack assumes loss amounts for different AY are ind’t)
what improvement does the Leveled Chain Ladder (LCL) model make to the Mack model?
(Meyers)
treats the level of the AY as random
how does the Correlated Chain-Ladder Model differ from the LCL model?
(Meyers)
allows for correlation between each subsequent mu (AY) parameter