Parliament Flashcards
Selection of members in the HoC
650 constit… 2015 3971 candidates seeking election… av of 6 per constit
Under fixed term parl act (2011) gen elecs are supposed to be held at regular intervals… early GE can be held if vote of no confidence… pm doesn’t form new gov in 14 days, 2/3 MPs support a motion calling for GE
3/4 of the total membs of the commons are known as backbenchers
Passing leg in HoC
Hoc exclusive power to give consent to taxation
Most leg is initiated by gov… limited opp for backbench and opposition MPs to prop measures of their own
Parl mostly reacts to measures but b4 it by the exec, rather than dev its own legislative props, rarely able to def or sig amend legislation… requires solid opposition+ Rebs for ex DC def in March 2016 on Sunday trading
Party whips resp for ensuring MPs vote as they should… rewards if do.. punishments is don’t e.g AMM sups from party + sit as indep
How can govs push through leg
Use the argument of overriding nec
The 2005 prevention of terrorism act, intro control orders for indivs susp off terrorism… completed all its stages in 18 days
Bills being unworkable
Some are so poorly drafted virtually unworkable
1991 dangerous dogs
Passed after tabloid stories about dog attacks… critics argued that instead of prohibiting certain dog breeds, should have targeted irresponsible owners
A review by the RSPCA, 25 years later, showed that 30 deaths caused by dogs in that period, 21 not spec in that act
Main functions of HoC
Passing legislation
Scrutinising of the exec
Prov mins
Rep the electorate
Providing mins
Convention is that mins must be sitting in one of the two houses. Parliament acts as a recruitment ground for future mins, w/ the whips making recommendations to the PM on suitable cands for prom.
PM has a wide power of patronage
Exclusive powers of HoC
Exclusive authority to give consent to taxation & pub expenditure
Chancellor of the exchequer- obliged to sit in commons, where the annual budget is always pres
Confidence & supply - can occur in the event of a minority gov, where the governing party does not join a formal coalition- relies on a limited agreement w/ another party- the cons arrangement w/ the DUP following the general election in June 2017.. cons 8 seats short… sup in case of no confidence + budget… concessions
How effectively does parl perform its representative function?
MPs loyalty to party + need for power comes into conflict w/ need to rep a constit
Ministerial code… advises to avoid conflict of interest
Allowed to make reps as long as clear acting for constit for ex in 2006 Hazel Blears, a memb of TBs cab, sup protests against the planned closure of part of a hospital in her Stafford constit
Cons not rep of Soc as a whole 35% women compared to 51% of pop
Representing the electorate
Commons has a rep function… elected
MPs are not delegates of their constit… use their own judgement on how to vote, rather than taking instructions from those who elect them
FPTP system means that there is a strong link between MP + constituency
MPs are expected to respond to issues raised by Indiv constituents and stand up for local interests at w’minster e.g Anthony Mangall + fishing rights for Brixham
+ a no of the 44 MPs who voted against the plans for the London to Birmingham High Speed Rail link (HS2) in March 2016… rep cons who wld be affected
Parl scrutiny
OPP seeks to hold the gov to account and expose its errors
Ministers have a duty to explain & defend their pol in parliament
Most imp was scrutiny is performed
-questions to ministers- may call for oral or written answers. PMQs, weekly in the commons has been criticised for being unduly theatrical and largely a point-scoring exercise dom by the PM + leader of opposition
Select coms which shadow Indiv gov depts in coms
Debates can be impressive set-piece events, such as Aug 2013 HoC deb in which the cam gov was defeated on its prop to undertake mil action in Syria.
Since 2010 the creation of the Backbench business com has given MPs to shape the agenda by allowing them to choose the topic of debate on one day per week
Members of HoL
Does not have an upper limit on the size of its membership
April 2024- 788 membs
92 Hereditary, life peers & 26 ‘lords spiritual’ who sit in for historical reasons
Passing legislation in the HoL
Lords are not allowed to interfere w/ the passage of ‘money’ bills
Lords have a right to amend non-financial legislation
Smaller teams of whips
Providing mins in the HoL
The award of peerage can on occasion be used to secure the services of a partic Indiv as a minister, if that person is not an MP.
For example, following the 2008 financial crisis, Gordon Brown recalled Peter Mandelson from the European Commission, pointing him so he could serve as bus sec
Parliamentary scrutiny in the HoL
DC= HoL + for sec, normally very few lords who are mins
Gov depts are rep in the Lords by a jr minister whose role is to oversee the passage of business through the upper house
Debates in the lords are oft given credit for their high quality, w/ participants commonly incl recently retired indivs w/ expertise in a partic field, rarely infl the course of events
The Lords + party Dominance
The lords is only rep in the sense that it contains ppl w/ a wide range of prof backgrounds… not org systematically.
The Lords is not dom by a single party in the way that the commons oft is, as a consequence of the distorting effects of FPTP
The Lords does not reflect the composition of the wider UK Soc. 1/2 over 75 3/4 male 5% ethnic minority
Main legal restraints of the HoL
Most imp legal restraints on the power of the Lords are prov by the parl acts of 1911 & 1949. The first of these came about when the Lords broke w/ the convention, est since the late 17th century, that they should not interfere w/ matters of taxation aft ppls budget
1911 and 1949 acts ag the lords
1911
-the lords had no right to delay money bills
-its power to veto non-financial bills was to be replaced by a power of delay lasting two parl sessions
1949
-only one session
1945 Salisbury convention constraining Lords power
Lords wld not oppose if mentioned in manifesto of winning party.
The Lords Power
Acts mainly as a revising chamber, prop amendments to gov legislation, which it is up to gov to accept or reject
can delay non-financial legislation for one year
The only scenario Lords can veto is if gov tries to extend its own life
In what ways is the Lords becoming more important?
1999 removal of hered peers… incr sense of leg
Life peers more likely to play a reg part in the work of the house.. hered peers rarely appear
Cons defeats 1979-97 211
Lab defeats 1997-2010 528
Trad dom of the house by the cons party came to an end.. no party has overall control of the Lords & so careful management of the house has become more important for govs
LD peers dem growing indep during the period of new lab gov
For ex after 2005 gen elec they opposed TBs prop for identities card even though announced in advance… no longer Salisbury convention bc got elected on low prop of vote
Coalition gov putting strain on Salisbury convention
Gov prog was based on coalition agreement, never put before voters
Cross-benchers in the Lords
Began to play a more imp role in holding gov to account.
As neutral figures they are more likely to assess a bill on its merits + to decide accordingly whether to support or oppose the gov
For ex, the cross-bench peer Lord Owen played a leading role in opposing the coalition govs controversial health & social care bill, measure was passed in March 2012 after the gov accepted the amendments prop by the Lords
How does the commons maintain its supremacy?
Does agree on occasions when there is obvious flaws in its own legislation
When clashes do occur the gov can usually make use of its maj in Commons to overturn critical Lords amendments if chooses to do so.
For example Feb 2012 coalition gov rejected 7 amendments to its welfare reform & work bill- arguing only commons can make dec w/ large financial imp.