Paper 3 Evaluation Flashcards
Top down approach
S= analysis of 100 serial killings 39 repetitive aspects for example hiding a body or cleaning up which match with the FBI organised profile
S= ability to adapt to other crimes used in burglaries found 85% rise solve involve interpersonal and opportunistic aspects to model
L= Model formed off of 36 interviews w murderers such small sample suggest unscientific question calidity
Bottom up approach
S= Canter & Landrigan 120 cases site of bodies created centre of grav around home more obv in marauders
S= Canter 66 sexual assault/ rape cases found patterns of behaviours and that pp are consistent w such
L= Rely on poor police data 75% crimes unreported which questions accuracy and possibly other factors such as motivation are important - may not lead to success
Lombrosos atavistic form
L= Delisi - Racist African descent sloping brow strong jaw and dark skin match w eugenic policies at time
S= Father of scientific criminology shifts crime away from one’s moral linking more to biological causes and science contributing to offender profiling
L= Goring 3000 criminals 3000 non criminals found no determining facial differences no evidence challenge credibility
Biological explanations of offending (genetic)
L= twin studies - assume equal environments however MZ are more likely to be treated similarly than DZ this affect behav - result in higher concordance
S= Medwick 13000 adoptees 13.5% chance no bio or adopt 20% likely if bio predisposition to offend 24.5% if both
Biological explain to offending (neural)
S= Kandel and Freed frontal lobe damage causation of antisocial personality disorder xxxxx
L= Farrington APD is believed to be due to physical neglect and trauma experienced in childhood from parental figures
Eysenks theory
S= 2070 prisoners compare to 2422 control found high levels on epq test in all factors
L= Bartol and Halonchock Hispanic and African American in max security prison were all less extrovert suggest culturally relative concept
L= Farrington meta analysis studies show high EPQ scores inconsistent w Eysenks theory regarding nervous systems using EEGs
Cognitive explanation to offending
S= Hostile Attribution Bias can lead to treatment through CBT face up to what done and acceptance of irrational behav
S= Palmer & Hollin showed 126 offenders 11 dilemmas and were found to be less morally mature
L= may not apply to all forms of offending such as impaulsive crimes like assault whereas shoplifting shows preconventional morality xxxxx
Differential association theory
S= can account for both blue and white collar crime- although thought only if in blue collar can apply to more corporate crime such as tax avoidance if exposed
L= many untestable aspects of theory difficult to operationalise different variables for example pro criminal attitude levels
L= risks stereotyping individuals from pro crime poor backgrounds for example ignoring decision making and easy skapegoat to shift blame
Psych explanation of offending
S= Goreta 10 offenders psychic therapy and found all had disturbed superegos post prevalent over-harsh superego self punishment
L= Gender bias - women have weaker superego thus more should be in prison however predominantly men questions freud theory
L= may not be causal link maternal deprivation may not be the cause of offending more likely due to situ like poverty exposed to procrim Attitudes and mothers working
Custodial sentencing
L= institutionalisation / prisonisation learn skills from others exposed to more criminal behav and attitudes
L= terrible impact on mental health 119 suicides in prison in 2019 2x the rate outside young males most at risk 25% w 15% M develop Sz
S= Opportunity to learn helpful life skills and access treatment Shirley found 43% less likely to offend after training
Behavioural modification
L= ethical issues - manipulation and dehumanisation obligatory removing freedom of choice withdrawing rights
S= straightforward easy training and cheap no need for specialist application can be used in all prisons
L= not long term behavioural modification little rehabilitation value lost when released from prison as play along to receive rewards regress back after
Anger management
S= outlasts behav modification causes more permanent change tackles causes of offending regarding cognitive processing and anger consequences
L= expensive requires trained professionals ability to deal w violent criminals prisons may not have funding or prisoners may not be committed
L= Howell found that there was no impact in comparison to no treatment in majority of cases apart from select few w v high aggression only benefit some
Restorative justice
S= decrease recidivism Strang et al meta analyse studies found rest justice sig less likely to reoffend and Bain found reduced rates in face to face
L= may abuse system Van Gijseghen offenders do this to avoid punishment and play down faults and are just as likely to reoffend
S= also benefits victims 85% satisfied 78% recommend 80% closure
Diagnosis of Sz
S= good reliability +0.92 test retest +0.97 inter rater
L= poor validity Cheniaux 68 ICD 39 DSM either under or over diagnosed
L= comorbidity if conditions occur together question valid of diagnosis eg 50% w depression and sub abuse
L= gender bias men more likely than women 1.4:1 ratio women hide better more support
L= culture bis Afro Caribbean in culture voices ancestors however abnormal and lead to overdiagnosing and discrimination
Biological explanation of Sz genes
S= support evidence tienari biological mother of adopted child cause heightened risk of developing sz
L= environmental support biological complications such as birth complications or physical such as thc rich cannabis and Morkved 67% trauma linkage
Biological explanation sz neural
S= Carren amphetamines once dopamine which worsened symp of sz and Taucher proved antipsychotic reduce dopamine less symp
L= post potter and scans found that neurotransmitter called glutamate abnormally high in those w Sz suggesting dp not only neurotransmitter