Paper 1 Essays Flashcards
Discuss research into coding
Baddeley - participant list of words recall after learning different list
Semantic sim words worst after 20mins mix up
Accoustic worse instant recall mix up
•S= application to memory models
•L= artificial stimuli useless words
Discuss research into duration
Petersons consonant syllable count backwards 3-18s 18 3% recall STM
Bahrick - high school 400 up to 75 left school 48yrs ago= 70% recog 15yrs=90%
•S- Bahrick high external validity real word stimuli
•L- Peterson v artificial stimuli decr external valid
•S- lab study
•L - Bahrick lack of control over confounding variables
Discuss research into capacity
Jacob’s digit span 9.2 letter span 7.3
Miller chunking 7 +/-2
•S- Jacob study replicated similar results
•L- 7+/- 2 exaggeration should be 4+/-1
Discuss the Multi store model theory
Sensory Reg = high capacity all sensory info coded modality specific duration 1/2 s
STM = 18s duration 7+-2 capacity accoustic coded
LTM= unlimited duration and capacity semantically coded
•S Plethora of supporting evidence first model of memory
•L- KF poor accoustic good visual STM
•L- elaborative Rehersal better than prolonged rehersal
Discuss Working memory model
STM separate slave systems
Central executive sort into separate systems low capacity and duration
Phonological loop - inner ear audit artic process - form speech loop words
Visuospatial sketch pad- visual cache spatial inner scribe colour etc
Episodic buffer time mark memories process into Ltm high capacity
•S- KF damage PL intact VSS
•L- lack of evidence of CE
•S- dual task performance worst same system
Discuss long term memory
Episodic - memory time stamped etc
Procedural - no recall required techniques
Semantic - facts and knowledge require recall
•S- HM and Clive wearing amnesia no episodic memory however CW could still play piano for example
L - contradicting neural research semantic left side prefrontal other episodic left and right encoding and retrieval
Discuss reasons of forgetting - interference
Retroactive
Proactive
McGeoch and McDonald- similar words resulted in worst recall testing retroactive
•S- Baddeley and hitch rugby players more games more forgetting
•L- interference is v rare and a rare form of forgetting better explained by other
•L- only partial forgetting can be overcome w cues
Discuss retrieval failure as an explanation for forgetting
When one cannot recall info from LTM
Context dependent forgetting- godden and Baddeley divers study
State dependent carter and cassaday antihistamines
Encoding specifity principle - cue has to present upon learning and recall
•S - plethora of supporting data
•L- Godden and Baddeley divers recognise is the same even w opposite conditions
•S- RWA Baddeley believed main reason go into room forget return remember again
Discuss misleading info as a reason affecting EWT
Leading questions - loftus and palmer crashed collided - smashed 10% more than collided - response bias change response or substitution bias smash glass
Post event discussion- gabbert et al found if discussed afterwards 72% of pp recalled info not from perspective - memory conformity memory contamination
•L- Sutherland et al conducted study repeat and key events effecting crime didn’t change
•S- Loftus and palmer repeat asked if glass smashed once more likely if smashed verb used
•L - lab study demand characteristics recall more to please the experimenter recall other aspects
•S- RWA in justice system avoid leading Q and application to cog interview
Discuss anxiety as a reason effecting eye witness testimony
+ve - shop robbery those directly involved had the greatest recall in comparison to bystanders seen to be most anxious
-ve- Johnson and Scott bloody knife and pen greasy tunnel vision on weapon 40% correctly ident knife in comparison to 70%
•S - London dungeons heart rate monitor those highest rate worst recall on average of actors
•L - bank robberies meta analysed in Sweden those score higher on anxiety scale greatest recall directly involved
•L - weapon focus pickel et al chicken in barber shop compared to scissors than more bizarre object the less accurate recall
Discuss the cognitive interview
Reinstate the context - imagine u are there at the scene trigger memories context dependent forgetting
Recall everything ensure details aren’t missed trigger other memories
Recall backwards to avoid schemas or dishonesty of recall
Change perspective pic self in a different perspective to trigger memories
•L - training time copious expensive
•S - meta analysed 44 cases found that majority using CI increased less than 4 stayed the same
•L- found that some aspects are more useful than other aspects recall everything and reinstate context best
Discuss research into conformity
Asch study - line X compare ABC 123 American males group of fake participants
Incorrect conform 37% of the time task was v easy NSI
Task difficulty changed conformity incr
ISI occurs
•S - research support Lucas et Al maths problems conformity incr when harder ISI occurs
•L- androcentrism basing off male standard
•S- Nolan San Diego NSI leaflets energy usage neighbours decr so pp decrease
•L - study seen as trivial to some pp so went along w conforming w majority
Discuss research into conformity to social roles
Zimbardo Stanford prison experiment 31 American men guards prisoners mentally stable found willing to conform to roles guards brutal and prisoners converse about prison life
Stopped after 6 days - mental instability
•S control of variables and validity in test method stable men randomly assigned
•L - based off of stereotypes and not conforming to social rules Cool hand Luke
•L- exaggerated those who confirmed upon review only 1/3 guards were brutal 2/3 didn’t conform and comforted prisoners- participate researcher bias
Discuss research into obedience
Milgrams test - 40 participant teacher and student actor zapped by current if incorrect answer 100% up to 300v 65% to 450v max
L- androcentrism base standard off of men conducted experiment w real puppy only 50% men obeyed 100% of women obeyed
S- study replicated by French TV showed similar signs of distress and similar obedience rate incr validity
L- content analysis found that only 50% thought that the shock was real and therefore this who didn’t carried on willingly
Discuss effect of situational variables on obedience referring to research
Milgrams test location conducted in run down office block obedience dropped to 47% Yale =legit
Uniform - member of public obedience dropped to 20% no authority
Proximity - learner in same room drop to 40% touch proximity 30% remote instructions 20.5%
•S- support by Bickman - mailman security guard and business man obey the security guard more pick up litter security more obey
•L - participants may be aware that this was fake extra manipulation of variables eg location to run down office block or use of a member of public ofc obedience drops - play acted see through deception
•S- replication in other cultures Dutch pp were ordered to say things in an interview 90% obeyed repeat Milgrams proximity factors
Discuss situational explanations of obedience
Agentic state - when one acts and feels as if no responsibility of actions acts as an agent for an authority figure autonomous state= normal
Legitimacy of authority - when one believes someone is an authority figure due to their position in social hierarchy perceived as authority above them in hierarchy
•S-Milgrams test participants asked investigator who is responsible po acted more willingly
•S - presence of evidence way of explaining cultural variation. Milgrams like test 16% aus obeyed 85% Germans obeyed
•S - Bickman security guard perceived to have greater authority highest obedience rates