PAPER 3 Flashcards
Random
This is when samples are taken by chance – a random number generator can be used to identify sample areas; this method should avoid bias but can cause an unrepresentative sample.
SYSTEMATIC
- This is when observations are taken at regular intervals
Olympic park hypothesis
Olympic Park: To investigate the extent to which regeneration of the area has improved the social and environmental quality of the area
hypothesises for Stratford
the regenerated areas have a lower crime index than the non regenerated areas
regenerated areas have a higher environmental quality than the non regenerated areas
how is the Olympic park relevant for our human fieldwork enquiry its topicality and practicality
it links to urban challenges section, the Olympic park is an example of urban regeneration
– this example of regeneration has been in the news a lot (2012 Olympics) The aim was to completely transform an area of East London and leave a lasting legacy of impact not just for sport but for the urban area in the East of London.
more practical as stratford is close to our skl
data collection methods for stratford (EQS)
an Environmental Quality Survey was completed at the four sites. Each location was scored from 1 (negative) to 5 (positive) for 10 variables.
Sampling method – stratified (2 regenerated and 2 non-regenerated)
Sample size – data collected a four sites
(The two recently regenerated sites where we would expect the most positive scores are 1. Victory Park East Village and 3. Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. 4. Liberty Bridge Road should be the most deprived site.)
what were the four sites for the eqs
victory park east village
stratford
queen Elizabeth Olympic park
liberty bridge road
data collection method crime index
Crime index – a crime index was completed at the four sites. Each location was scored from 1 (negative) to 5 (positive) for 8 variables.
Sampling method – stratified (2 regenerated and 2 non-regenerated)
Sample size – data collected a four sites
risks experienced on the fieldwork trip
strangers
crossing roads
public transport
safety
ways to present data
radar graphs
bar charts
adv and disad of radar graphs
easy to see patterns eg larger area = better environmental quality
can compare multiple sets of data overtime
difficult to plot limited use- only works for certain types of data
adv and disad of bar charts
show relationships between 2 or more variables
show proportions
combinations of qualitative and quantitative variables
Simple to construct and read
More than one set of data can be plotted on the graph to enable comparison
Plotting too much data makes it appear cluttered- less easy to interpret
what other methods could you use to plot data
pie chart
line graph
describe each set of data and explain what it tells you (RADAR)
radar graph is a graphical method of describing numerical data. Radar graphs give a clear explanation of the environmental quality of an area, these are able to be compared to each other because of the layout however radar graphs are difficult to plot and only works for certain types of data
describe each set of data and explain what it tells you (BAR CHART)
A bar chart is a diagram in which the numerical values of variables are represented by the height or length of lines. Bar charts are able to show the relationships between two or more variables bar charts are simple to construct and read, however plotting too much data makes it appear cluttered
conclusion
the enquiry question is why is this location( Stratford) suitable for our human fieldwork enquiry. In conclusion, the recent regeneration of the Olympic Park area in Stratford has significantly improved the social and environmental quality of the area… The two regenerated sites clearly have a higher quality environment… (EQS). Also, these two regenerated sites have much less evidence of crime than… (crime index).
evaluation of fieldwoek
we were timed in each area so we could’ve been rushed into making a decision
differently I would test out more areas to improve The investigation was subjective (your opinion rather than a factual piece of evidence) which means that the results may be different to someone else’s OPERATOR ERROR – could collate data from other people to improve?
Small sample size – more data needs to be collected (different days and times of the year) to improve the reliability
Overall, the validity of the results and conclusion is limited
location of tropical rainforests
Tropical rainforests are located around the equator. These areas are the Congo River Basin (western Africa), and throughout much of southeast Asia e.g. Malaysia and Indonesia. The biggest rainforest is in the Amazon River basin in the South America. (Smaller ones are located in Central America, Madagascar, Australia and nearby islands, India, and other locations in the tropics).
nutrient cycle
Trees, plants and animal material (biomass) provides litter (e.g. fallen leaves), which is then rotted down (decomposed) into the soil. The trees then uptake nutrients from the soil. When it rains some nutrients are lost from the surface of the litter (through surface run off), and nutrients are also lost after decomposition through leaching (when rain washes nutrients out of soil). This is more of a problem in tropical rainforests than where we live.
What is mainly found on the ground layer?
What heights do trees in the emergent layer reach? Over 30 metres
Decomposed material, scattered plants and fungi.
What are the conditions like in the understory layer?
Calm condition and there is limited sunlight
How does the canopy effect the understory and ground layers?
It protects the ground from heavy rainfall and reduces light
What heights do trees in the emergent layer reach?
over 30 metres
Describe the trends in deforestation in both the Brazilian Amazon and the non-Brazilian Amazon (4).
Overall deforestation rates have decreased in the Brazilian Amazon between 2001 and 2013. 3 million hectares of forest were lost in the Brazilian Amazon in 2004, whereas in 2013 approximately 1,250,000 million hectares were lost. In the non-Brazilian Amazon, the amount of forest lost is much lower than in the Brazilian Amazon. However, it appears that the rate of deforestation is increasing slightly in the non-Brazilian Amazon. Annual forest loss is greater than 500,000 hectares in 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012.