Paper 1 - attachment struggles Flashcards
Name 2 strengths of caregiver interaction + explain
-uses well controlled procedures
-it’s potential value to society
Name 2 limitations and expand on points - Care giver and infant interactions
-difficulty inferring development importance
-hard to know what is happening when observing infants
Name 2 strengths of Schaffer stages of attachment
-external validity
-longitudinally
Name 2 limitation of Schaffer stages of attachment
trigger word: Bowlby 1969
-problem with how multiple attachment is assessed
-problem in studying the asocial year
Name 2 strengths of animal studies
-support for the concept of imprinting
-important practical applications
Name 2 limitations of animal studies
-generalising findings and conclusions from birds to humans
-harlow faced severe criticism for the ethics of his research
Name 1 strength of learning theory
-some elements of conditioning could still be involved
Name 3 limitations of learning theory
-animal studies provide evidence against food as the basis of attachment
-human research shows that feeding is not an important factor
-ignores other factors linked with attachment
Name 2 strengths of Bowlbys monotropic theory
-clear evidence to support the existence and value of social releasers
-support for the idea of an internal working model
what is internal working model and name an example Bowlbys monotropic theory
child forms a mental representation of the relationship with their primary attachment figure. This serves as a template for what relationships are like
Name 2 limitations of bowlbys monotropic theory
-evidence for monotropy is mixed
-socially sensitive because of implications for mothers lifestyle
Name 2 strengths of ains worth
-predictive validity
-very good inter rater reliability
Name 2 limitations of ainsworth strange sit
-culture bound test
-temperament may be a confounding variable
Name the procedure of van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg (4)
-looked at proportions of attachment types across a range of countries / variation within and outside a country
-found 32 studies of attachment where the strange situation had been used. -These were conducted in 8 countries, 15 in the USA overall the studies yielded results for 1,990
-the data were meta-analysed, results being combined and weighted for sample size
Findings and conclusions of ban Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg
-there are cultural differences in the distribution of insecure attachment
- variation between results of studies within the same country was actually 150% greater than those between countries
Simonelli et al Procedure
-researchers assessed 76 12 month olds using SS to see whether the proportion of attachment types still matched previous studies
-mother’s were reasonably varied in education levels and their professions
Findings and conclusions Simonnelle et al
-50% B 36% A (lower rate then previous)
- due to increasing numbers of mothers working long hours and using professional childcare
-cultural changes can make dramatic difference in the patterns of attachment
Name 1 strengths of cultural variation in attachment
Name 3 limitations of cultural variation in attachment
-temperament may be a confounding variable in the SS
-not representative of cultures
-biased towards American/ British cultures
what is a critical period BMT
2 years when the infant attachment system is active (viewed more as sensitive period)
if not formed they will struggle to form one later
more time spent with mother is beneficial bc of .. BMT
- law of continuity
-law of accumulated separation
classical conditioning of attachment
UCS(food) +UCR (pleasure)
NS(caregiver) -> no response
UCS(food) +NS(caregiver)->UCR (pleasure)
CS(caregiver) -> CR (pleasure)
what does operant conditioning explain in the learning theory
why babies cry for comfort (an important building block for attachment