observations Flashcards
what must observations be?
why must we record what we see and hear?
must be selective.
what we see or hear is recorded in some way to allow the info to be analysed and interpreted.
what two things can observations generate?
give examples.
qualitative and quantitative.
-tally counts
-observer narratives
-audio or video recordings
what is event sampling?
give an example.
a procedure whereby the observer records each event that meets a predetermined definition.
-ticking a box every time someone scratches their head.
what is time sampling?
occurs when the researcher decides on a time interval (5 seconds) and then records what behaviour is occurring at that time.
what are the 3 types of observation and their definitions?
-naturalistic vs structured: where it usually goes on or setting up a place for it to specifically happen. no manipulation occurs in natural setting.
-covert vs overt: covert doesn’t know they are being watched whilst overt knows they are being watched. (see changing in behaviour)
-participant vs non-participant: participant is when the researcher is involved and non participant is when the researcher is watching and observing.
strength and weakness of natural observation
strength- high ecological validity, (real life settings) behaviour is natural.
weakness- lack of control over extraneous variables, difficult to replicate.
strength and weakness of structured observations
strength- high control over variables, easy to replicate, can focus on specific behaviours.
weakness-low ecological validity duo to artificial setting. behaviour may be unnatural.
strength and weakness of overt observations
strength- ethically sound (informed consent obtained)
weakness- observer effects may alter participants behaviour, reducing validity.
strength and weakness of covert observations
strength- reduces demand characteristics and observer effects, increasing validity.
weakness- ethical issues (lack of informed consent) limited to public settings.
strength and weakness of participant observations
strength- provides detailed in depth data and insight into group dynamics
weakness- observer may become biased or influence group behaviour
strength and weakness of non-participant observations
strength- observer remains objective and avoids influencing the group
weakness- may miss subtle group dynamics or deeper insights.