observational design Flashcards
ways of recording data: unstructured observation
- researcher may make unstructured observations where they write down everything they see so accounts of behaviour rich in detail are produced
> only appropriate when observations are small in scale and involve few participants eg. couples therapy
ways of recording data: structured observations
- there may be too much going on in a single observation for the researcher to record it all
- target behaviours are identified that will become the main focus of the investigation
- this then becomes a structured observation
strengths of structured observations
- makes recording data easier and more systematic
- data produced is likely to be numerical which means analysing and comparing the behaviour observed between participants is more straightforward
strengths of unstructured observations
more richness and depth of detail in the data collected
limitations of unstructured observations
- tend to produce qualitative data, which may be much more difficult to record and analyse
- greater risk of observer bias, as there are no objective behavioural categories
> the researcher may only record those behaviours that ‘catch their eye’ and these may not be the most important or useful
what are behavioural categories?
when a target behaviour is broken up into components that are observable and measurable (operationalisation)
> before observation begins, the researcher should ensure that they have, as far as possible, included all the ways in which the target behaviour may occur within their behavioural checklist
strengths of behavioural categories
makes data collection more structured and objective
limitations of behavioural categories
- it is important that such categories are as clear and unambiguous as possible
> they must be observable, measurable and self-evident; they should not require further interpretation - researchers should ensure that all possible forms of the target behaviour are included in the checklist
> there should not be a ‘dustbin category’ in which many different behaviours are deposited - categories should be exclusive and not overlap
> the difference between ‘smiling’ and ‘grinning’ would be very difficult to discern
sampling methods: continuous recording
- key feature of unstructured observations
- all instances of a target behaviour are recorded
- for very complex behaviours, this method may not be practical or feasible
how does sampling occur in structured observations?
the researcher must use a systematic way of sampling their observations:
- event sampling
- time sampling
what is event sampling?
a target behaviour or event is first established then the researcher records this event every time it occurs
> eg. counting the number of times players disagree with the referee
what is time sampling?
a target individual or group is first established then the researcher records their behaviour in a fixed time frame
> eg. in a football match, you make note (using a behavioural checklist) of what one specific player is doing every 30 seconds
evaluation of event sampling
+ useful when the target behaviour or event happens quite infrequently and could be missed if time sampling was used
- if the specified is too complex, the observer may overlook important details
evaluation of time sampling
+ effective in reducing the number of observations that have to be made
- those instances when a behaviour is sampled might be unrepresentative of the observations as a whole
what is inter-observer reliability?
the extent to which there is agreement between two or more observers involved in observations of a behaviour. the data from different observers should be compared to check for consistency ie. reliability