features of science Flashcards
what is a paradigm? (kuhn 1962)
a shared set of assumptions and methods that distinguishes scienfitic disciplines from non-scientific disciplines
why did kuhn suggest that psychology was best seen as a ‘pre-science’?
- doesn’t have a universally accepted paradigm
- marked by too much internal disagreement
- has too many conflicting approaches
what is a paradigm shift?
- a few researchers begin to question an accepted paradigm
- this critique gains popularity and pace
- eventually there is too much contradictory evidence to ignore
- kuhn suggested that progress within an established science occurs when there is a scientific revolution
what is a theory?
a set of general laws or principles that have the ability to explain particular events or behaviours
how does theory construction occur?
by gathering evidence via direct observation
what is hypothesis testing?
when a hypothesis is tested using systematic and objective methods to determine whether it will be supoorted or refuted
what is deduction?
the process of deriving new hypotheses from an existing theory
counterpoint: psychology does have paradigms, paradigms are flawed
- vast majority of researchers would accept ‘the study of mind and behaviour’ as a definition of psychology
- could be argued that psychology has already progressed through several paradigm shifts: wundt’s structuralism -> cognitive neuroscience
- feyerabend (1975) suggested that most sciences are characterised by internal conflict, dispute and a refusal to accept new ideas in the face of evidence
what is falsifiability?
principle that a theory cannot be considered scientific unless it admits the possibility of being proved untrue
what did popper (1934) suggest?
- key criterion of a scientific theory is its falsifiability
- genuine scientific theory should hold themselves up for hypothesis testing the the possibility of being proven false
- even when a scientific principle has been successfully and repeatedly tested, it is not necessarily true
how did popper distinguish a good science and a ‘pseudoscience’?
- good science = theories are constantly challenged and therefore can potentially be falsified
- pseudoscience = theories cannot be falsified
why is replicability an imortant element of popper’s hypothetico-deductive method?
if a scientific theory is to be trusted, the findings from it must be shown to be repeatable across a number of different contexts and circumstances
what should psychologists do for replicability to becomes possible?
- report their investigation with as much precision and rigour as possible
- this way, other researchers can seek to verify thier work and the findings they have established
what does objectivity mean?
all sources of personal bias are minimised to not distort or influence the research process
which methods in psychology tend to be the most effective?
- those with the greatest level of control
- eg. lab experiments