Obedience: Situational Variables Flashcards
After Milgram conducted his first study on obedience, he carried out a large number of what?
variations
Why did Milgram carry out a large number of variations?
In order to consider the situational variables that might lead to more or less obedience
True/False: In Milgram’s baseline study, the Teacher could hear and see the learner
False: The Teacher could hear the learner but not see him
What was the proximity variation of Milgram’s study?
The teacher and learner were in the same room
In Milgram’s proximity variation, the obedience rate increased/decreased
decreased
In Milgram’s proximity variation, the obedience rate dropped from 65% to __%
40
What was Milgram’s touch proximity variation?
The teacher had to force the Learner’s hand onto an ‘electroshock plate’ if he refused to place it there himsefl after giving a wrong answer
What was the effect on the obedience rate in Milgram’s touch proximity variation?
It dropped further to 30%
What was Milgram’s remote instruction variation?
The Experimenter left the room and gave instructions to the Teacher by telephone
What was the effect on the obedience rate in Milgram’s remote instruction variation?
Obedience reduced to 20.5% and participants also frequently pretended to give shocks
True/False: In Milgram’s remote instruction variation, participants frequently pretended to give shocks
True
Decreased proximity in Milgram’s experiment allowed people to…
psychologically distance themselves from the consequences of their actions
When the Teacher and Learner in Milgram’s baseline study were physically separated, the Teacher…
was less aware of the harm they were causing to another person so they were more obedient
What did Milgram do in his location variation?
Conducted a variation in a run-down office block rather than in the previous Yale University setting of the baseline study
Where did Milgram’s baseline study occur?
Yale University
In Milgram’s location variation, obedience fell to __._%
47.5
In Milgram’s location variation, why did obedience fall to 47.5%?
The previous university environment gave Milgram’s study legitimacy and authority
In Milgram’s experiment, why were participants more obedient in the Yale University setting?
They perceived that the Experimenter and study had legitimacy and authority, and that obedience was expected
True/False: In Milgram’s location variation, obedience was still quite high in the office block because the participants perceived the ‘scientific’ nature of the procedure
True
In Milgram’s baseline study, the Experimenter wore…
a grey lab coat as a symbol of his authority
What happened in Milgram’s uniform variation?
The Experimenter was called away because of an inconvenient telephone call at the start of the procedure. The role of the Experimenter was taken over by an ‘ordinary member of the public’ (a confederate) in everyday clothes rather than a lab coat
In Milgram’s uniform variation, why did the original Experimenter leave?
Was called away because of an inconvenient phone call at the start of the procedure
In Milgram’s uniform variation, who took over the role of the Experimenter?
An ‘ordinary member of the public’ (a confederate) in everyday clothes rather than a lab coat
In Milgram’s uniform variation, the obedience rate dropped to __%, the lowest of these variations
20
Which of Milgram’s variations led to the lowest obedience rate? What was the obedience rate of this variation?
Uniform, 20%