Non Fatal Offences Flashcards

1
Q

Assault is defined in

A

Common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actus Reus of assault

A

Causing the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 things to prove for assault

A
  1. D has done something threatening
  2. V apprehended immediate unlawful force
  3. Force V apprehended was ‘immediate’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case showing gestures/actions can be an assault

A

Read V Coker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case showing silence or verbal threats can be an assault

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case showing written words can be an assault

A

R v Constanza

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case showing words can negate a threat

A

Tuberville v Savage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case showing v can apprehend force even if it’s not possible

A

DPP v London

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

⭐️ Case showing force being ‘immediate’ means in the near future

A

⭐️ Smith v CCoW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mens rea of assault

A

Intention or recklessness to case V to apprehend immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Battery is defined in

A

Common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Actus reus of battery

A

Applying unlawful force on/to another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case showing the slightest/lightest of touch of even clothing can be battery

A

R v Thomas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

⭐️ Case showing force must be hostile which means unwanted and beyond jostlings of everyday life

A

⭐️ Wilson v Pringle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case showing force can be applied via continuing act

A

Fagan v MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case showing force can be applied indirectly eg. Via an object (chain reaction)

A

DPP v K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Case showing force can be applied via omission where D has a duty to act

A

DPP v Santana Bermudez

18
Q

Mens rea for battery

A

Intention or recklessness to apply unlawful force

19
Q

Assault occasioning actual bodily harm is defined in

A

Section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861

20
Q

Actus reus of assault occasioning actual bodily harm

A

Either an assault or battery which causes ABH to another person

21
Q

3 elements of actus reus to ABH

A
  1. Actus reus of assault or battery
  2. V suffers injury which counts as ABH
  3. The assault/battery causes that injury
22
Q

⭐️ case showing ABH harm cannot be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant

A

⭐️ r v Chan Fook

Psychiatric harm can be ABH

23
Q

Case that shows cutting hair can be ABH

A

DPP v Smith

24
Q

Case showing short loss of consciousness can be ABH

25
Wounding is defined in s20 and s18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
Actus reus of wounding is to unlawfully wound another person
26
⭐️ Case showing wound must break at least 2 layers of skin
⭐️ JCC v Eisenhower | Internal wounding doesn’t count
27
⭐️ S20 OAPA 1861 (Wounding & GBH)
⭐️ Direct intention or recklessness as to cause some harm - R v Mowatt
28
⭐️ S18 OAPA 1861 (wounding and GBH)
⭐️ Direct or Oblique intention to cause really serious harm - r v Belfon
29
GBH is defined in
S20 or 18 of the OAPA 1861
30
Actus reus of GBH
To inflict/ cause grievous bodily harm on a person
31
⭐️ case showing GBH means really serious harm but they don’t need to be life threatening
⭐️ DPP v Smith
32
Case showing GBH can be serious psychiatric harm
R v Burstow
33
Case showing GBH can be serious biological harm
R v Dica
34
Case showing an accumulation of minor injuries can be GBH
R v Brown and Stratton
35
Case showing age and health are factors that can be considered when deciding whether injuries are serious enough to be GBH
R v Bollom
36
Case showing GBH can be committed indirectly
R v Martin
37
Alternative mens rea S18 OAPA
Causing GBH and/or wounding with intention to resist arrest and intention or recklessness to cause some harm
38
⭐️ Savage (ABH mens rea)
Does not need to intent or realise a risk of harm (mens rea for assault or battery)
39
ABH injuries
Broken finger, chipped teeth, unconscious short period, broken toe, broken nose, bruise, swollen cheek, PTSD, black eye, depression, anxiety, sprained ankle, black eye
40
GBH injuries
Fractured skull, punctured lung, internal bleeding, clinical depression, severe bruising, broken leg, broken arm, broken collar bone, brain damage, broken ribs, paralysed