Intent To Create Legal Relations Flashcards
Social and domestic agreement presumption
Not binding
Jones v Padvatton
Shows strong relationship may indicate they did not intend to create legal relationship
Balfour v Balfour
Verbal agreements indicate there was not intent to create legal relations
Merritt v Merritt
Shows when agreements are written they may have had intention to create legal relations
Simpkins v Pays
Not being related as well as putting money towards something are both indicators there was intent to create legal relations
Parker v Clarke
Shows even if related, if big financial commitment made (putting financial security at stake) is made then it’s likely they intended to create legal relations
Commercial agreement presumption
Presumption is they do want to create legal relationship but can be rebutted
Esso v CCE
Promotional offers should be upheld because it’s wrong to make false promises that they benefit/profit from
Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros
When written in contract that it was not legally binding, it won’t be
B2B
Jones v Vernon’s Pools
When clearly stated it was not binding, it still isn’t binding in B2C
Kleinwort v MMC
Reassuring statements not the same thing as legally binding statement
Can look at conduct to decide if they intended legal relations
Edward v Skyways
When unclear if there was intent to create legal relations, stick with the presumption that it will be binding
Sadler v Reynolds
When unclear if had social or commercial nature- it is for the party claiming it was commercial to prove this