Involuntary Manslaughter Flashcards
GNM- Adomako elements
- Owe V duty of care/duty to act
- D must breach duty (involving risk of death)
- D’s breach must cause V’s death
- D must be grossly negligent
Duty to act- contractual
Pittwood
Duty while on the job
Duty to act- relationship
Gibbins and Proctor
Relation usually parent and child
Duty to act- assuming responsibility voluntarily
Stone and Dobinson
Voluntarily take responsibility for someone
R v Evans
Assumption of care must be significant for a defendant to be held responsible for an omission
Where D has willingly and actively taken over care of V
Not enough of simply trying to help
Duty to act- public office
Dytham
Duty from your job (can be off duty)
Duty to act- creating a dangerous situation
Miller
Causing risk for crime and not preventing it
GNM- duty of care
Robinson- has owed a duty if similar cases did
Novel: Caparo test
1. Reasonably foreseeable what D did would cause damage
2. Proximity between D and V
3. Fair, just and reasonable to impose duty on D
Ex turpi causa
Wacker
Parties involved in crime together do not owe each other duty of care(civil)
Does not apply to GNM
Means they will still owe each other a duty
GNM- breach duty
Blythe v BWW
Below standard of reasonable man/ not acting like reasonable person
Nettleship v Weston- inexperience doesn’t lower standard
Bolam- profession can change standard
Mullins v Richards- age can change standard
GNM- risk factors
Size of risk- Miller v Jackson
Seriousness of harm- Paris v SBC
Benefit out weights cost- Watt v HCC
Practicability of precautions- how practical (cheap/easy/quick)
Latimer v AEC- enough precautions
Haley v LEB- some precautions
Paris v SBC- no precaution
GNM- risk of death
Misra: confirmed need to have risk of death
Lewin v CPS: reasonable person needs to foresee risk of death
Causation
F.C- but for- Pagett
Legal- O&S (significant cause)- Smith
Act of God
Act of victim- Roberts, Williams
Act of third party- Jordan, Smith, Pagett
Must be grossly negligent
Adomako: D’s conduct is so bad in all circumstances, as to amount to a crime (discuss good and bad)
Define UAM
When D does not intend to kill or cause GBH but he has committed an unlawful act which has lead to death of V
⭐️UAM act must be unlawful
Stone and Dobinson- a failure to act will be insufficient for an unlawful act
Franklin- unlawful act must be criminal: civil wring is not enough
Lamb- unlawful act must be complete (all elements passed)