Involuntary Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

GNM- Adomako elements

A
  1. Owe V duty of care/duty to act
  2. D must breach duty (involving risk of death)
  3. D’s breach must cause V’s death
  4. D must be grossly negligent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duty to act- contractual

A

Pittwood

Duty while on the job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Duty to act- relationship

A

Gibbins and Proctor

Relation usually parent and child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Duty to act- assuming responsibility voluntarily

A

Stone and Dobinson
Voluntarily take responsibility for someone
R v Evans
Assumption of care must be significant for a defendant to be held responsible for an omission
Where D has willingly and actively taken over care of V
Not enough of simply trying to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Duty to act- public office

A

Dytham

Duty from your job (can be off duty)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duty to act- creating a dangerous situation

A

Miller

Causing risk for crime and not preventing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

GNM- duty of care

A

Robinson- has owed a duty if similar cases did
Novel: Caparo test
1. Reasonably foreseeable what D did would cause damage
2. Proximity between D and V
3. Fair, just and reasonable to impose duty on D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ex turpi causa

A

Wacker
Parties involved in crime together do not owe each other duty of care(civil)
Does not apply to GNM
Means they will still owe each other a duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

GNM- breach duty

A

Blythe v BWW
Below standard of reasonable man/ not acting like reasonable person
Nettleship v Weston- inexperience doesn’t lower standard
Bolam- profession can change standard
Mullins v Richards- age can change standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

GNM- risk factors

A

Size of risk- Miller v Jackson

Seriousness of harm- Paris v SBC

Benefit out weights cost- Watt v HCC

Practicability of precautions- how practical (cheap/easy/quick)
Latimer v AEC- enough precautions
Haley v LEB- some precautions
Paris v SBC- no precaution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

GNM- risk of death

A

Misra: confirmed need to have risk of death

Lewin v CPS: reasonable person needs to foresee risk of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Causation

A

F.C- but for- Pagett
Legal- O&S (significant cause)- Smith

Act of God

Act of victim- Roberts, Williams

Act of third party- Jordan, Smith, Pagett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Must be grossly negligent

A

Adomako: D’s conduct is so bad in all circumstances, as to amount to a crime (discuss good and bad)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define UAM

A

When D does not intend to kill or cause GBH but he has committed an unlawful act which has lead to death of V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

⭐️UAM act must be unlawful

A

Stone and Dobinson- a failure to act will be insufficient for an unlawful act
Franklin- unlawful act must be criminal: civil wring is not enough
Lamb- unlawful act must be complete (all elements passed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unlawful acts examples

A

Criminal damage/arson
Supplying drugs
Battery
Assault

17
Q

Case showing you only need MR for unlawful act

A

DPP v Newbury and Jones

18
Q

Case showing transferred malice can be used in UAM

A

Mitchell

19
Q

3rd element UAM

A

Causation

Unlawful act must cause V’s death

20
Q

Causation: Dear UAM

A

Self neglect by V does not break the chain of causation

21
Q

Drugs cases and principles

A

Cato: if D administers drug to V they
Kennedy: when V injects themselves they break the chain

22
Q

⭐️ act must be dangerous- Church

A

If a sober and reasonable person would realise that it carries a risk of some physical harm to another person- dangerous

23
Q

Act must be dangerous- Dawson

A

Needs to be physical harm, not emotional harm

24
Q

R v JM and SM

A

Don’t need to foresee specific harm from which V died, only that V would suffer harm of some sort

25
Q

Unlawful act must be dangerous- goodfellow

A

Unlawful act can still be aimed at property as long as sober and reasonable person would realise it carries risk of some physical harm to a person

26
Q

Unlawful act must be dangerous- Farnon and Ellis

A

Always compared to sober and reasonable person

Didn’t matter if they have mental deficits etc