NiTi instruments for root canal preparation Flashcards
Taper of file
Amount by which diameter of an instrument increases from tip to handle
2%
Every mm from tip, diameter increases by 0.02mm
Tip sizes
Length
Smallest
Largest
Increase in set increments
16mm long
Smallest - 0.06mm
Largest 1.40mm
Three types of traditional
K-files
Flexible k-files - SS or NiTi
Hedstrom files - will break in narrow canals or using fine prep
2 methods of use of traditional files
Watchwind pull
- 30 degree winding each way and then pulling
- negotiating canal and preparing apical 1/3
Balanced force
- 60 degree clockwise followed by 120 degree AC with apical pressure
- fractures off dentine lodged in flutes
- apical 1/3
Advantages of traditional
Traditional files still fulfil and essential role in endo
Can be used very effectively to produce satisfactory canal shaping during chemomechanical canal prep
- Essential to negotiate canals and produce glide path
Disadvantages of traditional
- They have a tendency to produce canal shapes which are narrow
- They become increasingly inflexible in the larger sizes
- Root canals are rarely an 02 taper
- The traditional preparation techniques use a
lot of instruments - Must be used in a ‘reciprocating fashion – if they are continually rotated they will fracture
-The push-pull action often used with traditional files has
a tendency to create ledges - This action can also push debris into the canal causing blockages
- It takes a long time to prepare a canal with traditional files/techniques
NiTi - properties
Super elastic alloy
Enhanced flexibility and shape memory
Reduces chance of canal straightening
Allows files to be created with greater taper whilst retaining elastic modulus
Why is NiTi so flexible
MArtenite/Austenite forms
Forms martensite when outer stress applied
Transforms back to austenite when stress is released
Super elastic NiTi can be strained several times more without deformation
NiTi file design
Rake angle
Most have
Presence of grooves allows
Will generally follow canal because
Disadvantages of NiTi file
Angle between the leading edge of the cutting tool and the surface being cut Rake angle can be -ve, +ve or neutral Most have slightly -ve angle Efficient removal of debris from the root canal Non-cutting edge
Produce thicker smear layer in apical area
Non-cutting edge
May or may not have radial lands - absence means more likely to get stuck
Using files in practice
Which technique should be utilised
Files are for canal ENLARGEMENT not negotiation
Crown DOWN technique
If canal has plenty of space and glide path already present
WL can be established without opening 2/3
Shape produced by NiTi files
Gradually tapering prep with wider coronal and decreasing taper towards apex
ProTaper
6 files
3 shaping - SX S1 S2 - CORONAL 2/3
3 finishers - F1, F2, F3 - STEPBACK
Properties of Protaper and mechanism
Progressively tapered files
Triangular cross section
Active cutting blades
Blunt tip to help file remain centred
Function of shaping files
Shape coronal and middle third of canal