Moral Conflict Flashcards

1
Q

Milgram: baseline condition

A

65%
- percent of participants who kept on shocking
- saw learner get hooked up + teacher got test shocked
- similar results with female participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Milgram: dubious institutional context

A

48%
- run-down office building off-campus rather than on-campus
- place did not have institutional credentials of Yale University

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Milgram: Learner in the same room

A

40%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Milgram: Learner even closer and physical contact required to shock

A

30%
- teacher held down learner so they get shocked properly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Milgram: Experimenter in another room

A

21%
- communicate through telephone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Milgram: two peers disobey

A

10%
- 4 subjects total, but only 1 is real, others are actors
- 2 fake subjects stop during 100 volts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Moral dilemma

A
  • if the tendency to comply with authority were the only psychological force operating in the situation, all subjects would have continued to the end
  • if sympathetic concern for the victim were the exclusive force, all subjects would have calmly defied the experimenter
  • instead, both obedient and defiant outcomes, accompanied by extreme tension
  • conflict develops between not harming others and obeying others who are in authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

do the morally right thing or do the different morally right thing?

A
  • moral principle: Don’t hurt people + Evidence of Learner’s pain –> Morally appropriate behaviour: Stop shocking –> Moral conflict –> Stress –> What to do?

AND

  • moral principle: Obey authority + Experimenter says continue –> Morally appropriate behaviour: Continue shocking –> Moral conflict –> Stress –> What to do?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Moral foundations: Dubious institutional context

A
  • reduces authority
    (experimenter is not from Yale)
    (not vested with apparent credibility because outside of Yale)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Moral foundations: Learner in the same room

A
  • increase care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Moral foundations: Experimenter in another room

A
  • reduces authority
    (don’t feel like they’re watching you, easier to exit situation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moral foundations: Two peers disobey

A
  • reduces authority
  • conform to other people’s belief
    (conform to norms, which are invisible forms of authority)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Milgram: Role Permutations

A

messing around with the roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Role Permutations: Learner demands to be shocked, but experimenter says stop

A

0%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Role Permutations: Two experimenters issue conflicting commands

A

0%
- follow which authority figure that is consistent with what you think is morally correct
- upholding obeying authority because one experimenter is telling you to stop

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Role Permutations: No actual experimenter, but another subject acts as the experimenter

A

20%
- ordinary guy had no authority, but gained some after being experimenter

17
Q

Role Permutations: Experimenter is the Learner and another subject acts as the Experimenter

A

0%
- experimenter still has authority even though he became the learner

18
Q

Role Permutations: 2 Experimenters; One is the Learner; conflicting commands

A

65%
- experimenters willing to do experiment so subject continues
- slipperiness of authority