Causal Attributions and Social Judgements Flashcards
internal attribution vs external attribution
- caused by something about the person -> “He’s a clumsy doofus”
- caused by something about the situation -> “It’s slippery out there”
internal causal attributions
- perceivers often show a bias toward making internal attributions about the causes of other people’s actions or outcomes rather than situation
correspondence bias & fundamental attribution error
people show bias toward making internal attributions about the causes of other people’s actions or outcomes
problematic consequences of the fundamental attribution error
- erroneous inferences about people’s personality traits or attitudes
- erroneous inferences about people’s aptitudes or abilities
- erroneous stereotypes about groups
erroneous inferences about people’s personality traits or attitudes
- failure to account for the power of the situation
- e.g., someone assigned to write a paper about a topic (e.g., communism) –> readers thinks the writer believes what they wrote even though it was assigned
erroneous inferences about people’s aptitudes or abilities
- e.g. the quiz game
- contestants = dumb because they didn’t know answers
- host = smart because they know the answer, but it’s because they made the questions
- in situations where structural inequalities exist, and some people have the advantage of power or control and others don’t: observers are apt to underestimate the extent to which the seemingly positive attributes of the powerful simply reflect the advantages of social clontrol
erroneous stereotypes about groups
e.g. people attribute differences in group outcomes to differences in group members’ abilities, even when those differences are caused by well-known structural inequalities
why do people make the fundamental attribution error?
FAST:
observe someone’s behaviour -> initial assumption of an internal cause -> inference (he’s a clumsy doofus)
SLOW:
observe someone’s behaviour -> initial assumption of an internal cause -> consideration of possible external causes, with adjustments and corrections to the initial assumption -> inference (it’s slippery out there)
when do people make the fundamental attribution error?
- when perceivers’ focus is on figuring out people (vs. figuring out situations) –> initially assumes an internal cause for their behaviour
- when perceivers lack the motivations or capacity for effortful cognition
what do individualistic people perceive?
internal cause
what do collectivist people perceive?
external cause
what happens when someone is cognitively busy?
- lack motivation to engage in effortful thinking or lack the cognitive capacity
recipe for pluralistic ignorance
two or more people involved
- uncertainty
(people are unsure about the best way to act) - social cues
(people use other people’s behaviour to inform them) - fundamental attribution error
(people erroneously judge that other people’s behaviour reflects those people’s true attitudes, even when it doesn’t)
what is the implication for pluralistic ignorance?
everyone does what everyone else is doing instead of doing what they all are privately inclined to do
examples of pluralistic ignorance
- failures to help people in need
- overconsumption of alcohol
- missed opportunities for romantic relationships
- missed opportunities for intergroup contact