Module 5 Flashcards
What are dual relationships?
-
Dual/multiple relationships; engaging in another significant meaningful relationship with client in addition to client/therapist
- Either simulatenously or after ending sessions
- Not Incidental/accidental contact or Boundary crossing
-
Three tips for avoidance;
- Be aware of client vulnerability
- In cases of potential conflict of interest, negotiate plan to minimise before commencement
- Ensure objectivity is not compromised
What is the difference between boundary crossing and boundary violations?
-
Boundary crossing; Benign, constructive interactions with client that cross traditional boundaries of relationship
- Examples of boundaries; physical contact, self-disclosure, gifts, services, session time
- Not always problematic but can be a precurser to later transgressions
-
Boundary Violations: Major transgressions which disadvantage the client
- eg a sexual relationship
What four strategies of ethics acculturation are outlined by Gottlieb and Younggren?
- Two variables in acculturation process
- Maintenance: how much students retain personal ethics and values
- Contact and Participation: degree of adoption of professional ethics
-
Integration Strategy: high on both - incorporate both professional ethics and personal morals
- Least likely to fall for slippery slope
-
Separation: high maintence low contact;
- More likely to take first step, not slide though
-
Assimilation; low maintenance high contact - losing personal values
- Risk of over simplification, distress if rigidity broken
-
Marginalisation: Low on both
- Most risk of slipery slope
What 8 recommendations are made by Gottlieb and Younggren to avoid a slippery slope?
- Establish a comprehensive informed consent
- Peer consultation groups (promote integration strategy and reduce cognitive errors)
- If an issue is identified, document a consultant’s suggestions.
- Develop and document your own practice ethics policies for consistency
- Expand on psychotherapist factors included into EDMMs
- Include understanding of interaction of multicultural context and expected professional boundaries in competence
- Use positive ethics rather than anxiety based ethics
- Practice self care
What is the 9-step framework suggested by Pope and Keith Speigel for evaluating boundary crossing?
- Imagine the best and worst possible outcomes
- Consider research on this boundary crossing
- Be familiar with codes, guidelines etc
- Identify a colleague you can trust for feedback
- Pay attention to any uneasy feelings or doubts and their origin
- Be stringent in informed consent
- Refer client onward if you feel compromised or incompetent
- Do not overlook informed consent process for any planned boundary crossing
- Keep careful notes.
What 7 common errors are outlined by Pope and Keith-Speigel in boundary crossing?
- What happens outside the session doesn’t impact therapy
- An action with a therapy client has the same meaning as the action for a non-client
- Out-of-context fallacy; client culture, context, etc all affect the meaning of an action
- The client has the same understanding of the action that you do
- Boundary crossing that helped one client will help another client in the same way
- A boundary crossing is a static isolated event
- If you can’t see any issues with an action, there aren’t any
- Self-disclosure is always therapeutic
According to Sonne (2005) what therapist factors need to be considered regarding boundary crossing?
- Ethical sensitivity; level of training and recognition of ethical issues
- Willingness to expend effort; avoid making decisions based on simplicity, effort leads to recognition and action on ethical dilemmas
- Guiding ethical principles; Is greater sway given to non-maleficence or client autonomy?
- Gender; Women are more risk averse than men
- Culture/religion; can affect normal levels of personal space/touching
- Profession; Psychiatrist, social worker, psychologist
- Theoretical orientation; psychodynamic therapists more critical of finanical/social connections
- Years as a therapist; tend to be more forgiving of MRs with time, although no more likely to engage
According to Sonne (2005) what client factors need to be considered regarding boundary crossing?
- Traits, background;
- Gender; eg men might be encouraged to relate through sport
- Culture/Religion; cultural clashes can lead to percieved boundary crosses. Shared religion can lead to social contact.
- Strengths and vulnerabilities; clients social network strenght, ability to observe and understand boundaries. Eg BPD NPD
- History of prior boundary violantions (abuse)
According to Sonne (2005) what therapeutic relationship factors need to be considered regarding boundary crossing?
- Nature of Therapeutic Relationship;
- Level of client clarity over the relationship informed consent
- Level of client emotional response to therapist
- Power differential;
- Duration of therapeutic relationship
- Practice setting; Private practice psychs rate financial MR as significantly less ethical vs community outreach psychs
- Location; small town practitioners more tolerant of non-sexual multiple relationships
According to Sonne (2005) what other relationship factors need to be considered regarding boundary crossing?
- Clarity of change; level of informed consent and understanding of any changes to avoid confusion
- Motivation for change; who’s needs are being met?
- Professionals response; Need to account for non-rational factors which may be influencing decision
- Potential for role conflice; Will the roles actively conflict with each other
- Potential for harm and benefit;
- Setting for other relationship
What strategies does Dr White suggest to manage unavoidable multiple relationships?
- Set clear boundaries
- Obtain informed consent of the client
- Seek consultation/supervision to aid objectivity
- Document and monitor your practices
- Ask yourself if the potential benefit outweights potential harm
- Self Monitoring is critical
- Be sure to meet client needs not yours
What 9 steps do Pope and Keith-Spiegel recommend when problems arise from boundary crossing?
- Continue to monitor the situation carefully
- Be open and non-defensive
- Talk over the situation with an experienced colleague
- Listen carefully to the client
- Try to see things from the clients point of view
- If there is a formal complaint, follow recommended actions
- Keep adequate, honest, and accurate records of the situation
- Consider apologising
- Be clear, direct, personal and sincere
- A partial, qualified non apology is worse than nothing
What five types of multiple relationship are identified by Hammond?
- Circumstantial relationships; Coincidential, likely to occur in small communities.
-
Structured MRs; when psych and client have more than one role
- eg uni lecturer, researcher, supervisor
- Shifts in professional role; Can occur when psych moves to senior position
- Personal and Professional role conflict; when personal relationships are followed by professional ones or vice versa
- Predatory relationships; taking advantage of the client eg sexual