module 2 - thinking critically with psychological science Flashcards
what can intuition do to us?
lead us astray (wrong direction)
why are our notions of common sense similar to intuition?
common sense can err (be mistaken or incorrect)
describe:
hindsight bias
aka. the I-Knew-It-All-Along phenomenon
the tendency to believe, after learning an outcome, that we would have foreseen it
how can hindsight bias make research findings seem like common sense?
learning the outcome of a study can make it seem like common sense because it makes us believe that we already knew it
who named the hindsight bias phenomenon?
Paul Slovic and Baruch Fischhoff in 1977
describe:
overconfidence
we tend to think we know more than we do
how does overconfidence contaminate our everyday judgements??
both, hindsight bias and overconfidence, often lead us to overestimate our intuition
how does science overcome overconfidence?
restrains errors by taking us beyond our intuitions and common sense
fill in the blank:
science sift _______ from fantasy/illusions which requires a __________ ________
reality
scientific attitude
what do psychologists approach a scientific inquiry with?
curious skepticism AND humility
they ask two questions: what do you mean and how do you know?
definition:
humility
humbleness
- being able to reject your own ideas
what can skeptical testing reveal?
which ones best match the facts in an area of competing ideas
what are the ideals that unify psychologists with scientists?
curious
skeptical
humble scrutiny of competing ideas
what does scientific attitude prepare us for?
smart thinking aka. critical thinking
what do you do with critical thinking?
- examine assumptions
- discerns hidden values
- evaluates evidence
- assesses conclusions
fill in the blank:
psychologists arm their scientific attitude with the __________ ______
scientific method
define:
scientific method
self correcting process for asking questions and observing nature’s answer
what are the parts of the scientific method?
- make observations
- form theories
- form hypotheses
- refine theories in the light of new observations
define:
hypotheses
testable predictions, often implied by a theory
define:
scientific theory
explains through an integrated set of principles that organizes and predicts behaviors or events
theory links with observations and simplifies everything so we do not have to memorize all the facts
how do psychologists check on their biases?
psychologists report their research with precise operational definitions of concepts which allows anyone to replicate their observations
when one replicates the study, they should get similar results which then allows our confidence in the finding’s reliability to grow
what are the two criteria of a good and useful theory?
- effectively organizes a range of self-repots and observations
(i. e. organizes and links observed facts) - implies clear predictions that anyone can use/recreate to check the theory or to derive practical applications
(i. e. implies that the hypotheses offer testable predictions and practical applications)
what type of environment do researchers test theoretical principles in?
a controlled and simplified environment
what does a controlled and simplified environment do?
allows the researchers to focus on the study of one or two specific behaviors