Misleading Information Flashcards

1
Q

What is an eye witness

A

Someone who has witnessed a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an eye witness testimony

A

Evidence provided by eye witness regarding a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is lotters and palmer 1974 study on leading questions

A

-45 students shown 7 traffic accident films
-Given a questionnaire with a critical question but different verb
Suggests leading questions cause a desired answer which can cause misleading information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is lotters and palmer 1974 study results

A

Verb
1)How fast where the cars going when they HIT
2)How fast where the cars going when they BUMPED
3)How fast where the cars going when they COLLIDED
How fast where the cars going when they CONTACTED
5)How fast where the cars going when they SMASHED

mean estimated speed
1)34 2) 38.1 3) 39.3 4)31.8 5)40.8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is lotters and palmer 1974 study advantage and disadvantage

A

Advantage:

  • cause and affect
  • controlled

disadvantage:

  • no emotional attachment so inapplicable
  • unrepresentative
  • small sample
  • student sample so unrepresentative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who did the broken glass study

A

Lottus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What where the participants in the broken glass study

A

150 Students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the broken glass study’s method

A

Where shown a short film of multi-vehicle collision and asked questions, returned a week later and asked if they saw any broken glass (there was none)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the broken glass study’s conditions

A

1) “how fast where the cars going when they hit eachover”
2) “how fast where the cars going when they smashed into eachover”
3) nothing about the speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the broken glass study’s findings

A

Smashed= 32%
Hit= 14%
Control=12%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the broken glass study’s conclution

A

Show verb (leading questions) affects memory’s due to substitution bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the advantage and disadvantage of the broken glass study.

A

Advantage:
independent measures so comparable

Disadvantage:
assumes schemas
Not consistent accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What’s the conformity affect

A

Co-witnesses reach a consensus view on what happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What study examines post event discussion

A

Gabbert et al 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly