Methods (general) Flashcards
Why is significance not equivalent to the strength of the correlation?
Because significance is affected by sample size
What are some strengths of case studies?
They offer detailed, rich insight into real life cases. They can generate hypotheses for future study and challenge current theories.
What are some weaknesses of case studies?
Inappropriate to generalise from one-off cases. Interpretation of such cases can be subjective. They rely on truth and accuracy from the individual.
What are some strengths of content analysis in general?
It avoids ethical issues involved in obtaining permission as much of the communications are publicly available. It has high external validity. It is flexible in that it can produce qualitative or quantitative data.
What are some weaknesses of content analysis in general?
The communications are studied outside of the context they occurred so may be misinterpreted. It may suffer from a lack of objectivity.
Evaluate the use of quantitative content analysis
Strengths: objective, produces clear statistical patterns
Weaknesses: Inflexible, lacking in detail
Evaluate the use of qualitative content analysis
Strengths: detailed, preserves depth of data
Weaknesses: subjective, time consuming
Explain the test-retest method of assessing reliability
The same test is administered to the same participant on different occasions. An appropriate amount of time should be allowed between the test and retest - not so much that the participant themselves has changed, but not so little that they recall their answers to the test. If the test is reliable it should produce the same results both times (this is tested by correlating the two sets of results).
How can the reliability of a questionnaire be improved?
If the test-retest method shows poor reliability, complex or ambiguous questions should be removed or rewritten.
How can the reliability of an interview be improved?
The same interviewer should be used for all interviews, and if this is not possible interviewers should all be properly trained in the same way. Structured interviews are most reliable.
How can the reliability of experiments be improved?
Through standardisation and making the experiment replicable
How can the validity of experimental research be improved?
Using a control group, standardisation, and single/double blind procedures
How can the validity of questionnaires be improved?
By using a lie scale, and insuring anonymity
How can the validity of observations be improved?
By doing a covert observation, and ensuring that behavioural categories are not too broad, overlapping, or ambiguous
How can the validity of qualitative methods (e.g. case studies, interviews) be improved?
Demonstrating that the researcher’s interpretations match the participant’s (interpretative validity), using a number of different sources as evidence (triangulation)