Memory (2022) Flashcards

1
Q

describe LTM

A

LTM consists of 3 types: episodic, semantic, procedural

split into declarative (episodic and semantic) and non declarative (procedural)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

episodic memory

A

memory of events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

semantic memory

A

memory of what things mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

procedural memory

A

memory of how to do things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

declarative

A

episodic and semantic memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

non declarative

A

procedural memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

give 3 evaluation points of LTM

A

STRENGTH - LTM has specific locations in the brain
STRENGTH - supported by amnesiacs
WEAKNESS - too simple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

elaborate strength of LTM (LTM has specific locations in the brain)

A

LTM has specific locations in the brain

Brain scans show that different areas have different functions e:g motor area shows procedural memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

elaborate weakness of LTM (too simple)

A

LTM is too simple

Distinctive types of LTM are difficult to separate so this may be a oversimplification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

elaborate strength of LTM (supported by amnesiacs)

A

Supported by amnesiacs
Clive Wearing lost most of his semantic memory but retained his procedural memory
This shows different types of LTM are stored in different places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

serial position effect

A

The tendency to remember words at the beginning and end of a list more than the middle
‘Serial position curve’ describes the recall if plotted on a graph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

primacy effect

A

The tendency to remember words at the beginning of a list more as they have been rehearsed (LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

recency effect

A

The tendency to remember words at the end of a list more as they have been heard recently (STM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

aim of Murdock’s serial position curve study

A

To see if recall was affected by position of words in a list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

method of Murdock’s serial position curve study

A

16 participants listened to 20 word lists of varying length (10-40w) and were asked to recall after each list. They were given 90 seconds to recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

results of Murdock’s serial position curve study

A

Recall was related to position in the list
Higher recall for words at the beginning (primacy)
Higher recall for words at the end of list (recency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

conclusion of Murdock’s serial position curve study

A

Shows the serial position effect and supports MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

give 3 evaluation points of Murdock’s serial position curve study

A

STRENGTH - lab experiment
STRENGTH - supporting research
WEAKNESS - artificial task

19
Q

elaborate strength of Murdock’s serial position curve study (lab experiment)

A

Lab experiment
There was a high level of control and firm conclusions can be made
Position of words does affect recall

20
Q

elaborate strength of Murdock’s serial position curve study (supporting research)

A

Supporting research
Carlesimo et al found that some amnesiacs can’t store LTM and don’t show a primacy effect
This shows primacy effect is related to LTM

21
Q

elaborate weakness of Murdock’s serial position curve study (artificial task)

A

Artificial task
Word lists were used which only test one type of memory
So the study lacks validity

22
Q

describe the theory of reconstructive memory

A

People build memory as an active process, It isn’t an exact representation of events. We reconstruct memories

We record fragments and recombine them with our expectations

Our expectations come from the culture we live in and affect storage and recall

We use effort after meaning

23
Q

effort after meaning

A

We focus on the meaning of events and make an effort afterwards to make sense of the fragments of memory

24
Q

give 3 evaluation points of the theory of reconstructive memory

A

STRENGTH - more realistic than other theories
WEAKNESS - some memories are still accurate
STRENGTH - can be applied to the real world

25
elaborate strength of the theory of reconstructive memory (more realistic than other theories)
More realistic than other theories | Research into reconstructive memory doesn't use artificial materials so is more valid
26
elaborate weakness of the theory of reconstructive memory (more realistic than other theories)
Some memories are still accurate | If some components of memory are still the exact same then not all recall is reconstructed
27
elaborate strength of the theory of reconstructive memory (can be applied to the real world)
Can be applied to the real world In eyewitness testimony people don't always recall accurately, the theory can explain why EWT is no longer regarded as solid evidence
28
what are the 3 factors affecting memory?
Interference Context False memory
29
interference
Forgetting may occur if two memories compete with each other, especially if the two are similar
30
give 3 evaluation points of interference affecting memory
WEAKNESS - may not be an explanation for forgetting WEAKNESS - artificial task was used STRENGTH - research was highly controlled
31
elaborate weakness of interference affecting memory (may not be an explanation for forgetting)
May not explain forgetting Interference may be temporary and information is not actually forgotten. If a cued recall test is given information can be recalled This shows information is stored in memory but not accessible
32
elaborate weakness of interference affecting memory (artificial task was used)
Artificial task was used | This doesn't reflect real life memory as we don't have to remember wordlists often
33
elaborate strength of interference affecting memory (research was highly controlled)
Research was highly controlled Techniques such as counterbalancing were used to reduce bias We can be sure that interference affected memory
34
context
The situation in which something happens, can be used as a cue to aid recall
35
give 3 evaluation points of context affecting memory
WEAKNESS - only affects very similar situations WEAKNESS - in research recall was short term WEAKNESS - artificial task was used
36
elaborate weakness of context affecting memory (only affects very similar situations)
Only affects very similar situations Context only acts as a cue if the learning environment was the same as the recall environment Therefore context doesn't affect recall in many situations
37
elaborate weakness of context affecting memory (in research recall was short term)
In research recall was short term Participants asked to recall words almost immediately unlike real life So results can't be applied in real life
38
elaborate weakness of context affecting memory (artificial task was used)
Artificial task was used | Wordlists were used and when more complex materials were used better results were found
39
false memory
Memory of an event that didn't happen but feels as if it did happen
40
give 3 evaluation points of false memories affecting memory
STRENGTH - can be applied to EWT WEAKNESS - study raises ethical concerns WEAKNESS - false memory was not of the traumatic kind
41
elaborate strength of context affecting memory (can be applied to EWT)
Can be applied to EWT The results suggest that police questioning could accidentally implant false memories This can explain why EWT is unreliable
42
elaborate weakness of context affecting memory (study raises ethical concerns)
Study raises ethical concerns Despite being debriefed participants may have been left with implanted false memories which lingered Therefore the study may have caused psychological harm
43
elaborate weakness of context affecting memory (false memory was not of the traumatic kind)
False memory was not of the traumatic kind found in therapy Harmless events may be implanted easier than traumatic events Therefore limited conclusions can be drawn