Memory Flashcards
Cognitive psychology definition
concerned with people’s thought processes and how these affect the way in which they behave.
Memory definition
the process of retaining learned information, and accessing this information when it is needed.
What are the processes in memory
Coding
Storage
Retrieval
What are the different types of memory
Sensory register
Short term memory
Long term memory
Capacity
Duration
Coding definition
The way information is changed so that it can be stored in mem
Storage definition
Keeping information within the memory system until it is ne
Retrieval definition
Recovering information stored in the memory system when it is
required.
Sensory register definition
contains unprocessed impressions of information received through the senses.
It is modality specific meaning that each sensory store codes information differently. It has a separate sensory store for each sensory input.
E.g There is an iconic store for visual information and the echoic store for auditory information.
Short term memory definition
a temporary store for information received from the SR.
Long term memory definition
a permanent store holding limitless amounts of information for long periods of time, potentially a lifetime.
Capacity definition
The amount of information that can be held in memory before new incoming information displaces it.
Duration definition
The amount of time information can be held in a memory store before it is lost due to decay.
Investigating coding in STM (Baddeley)
he gave participants four lists of words to recall.
List A contained words that sounded similar and list B had words that sounded dissimilar.
List C contained words that had similar meanings and list D had words with dissimilar meanings.
Baddeley argued that STM is coded acoustically because when tested participants performed worse with list A than list B, but there was no difference between list C and D. This is because STM organises information according to how it sounds, similar sounding words can become muddled.
Investigating coding in LTM (Baddeley)
He tested participant’s recall of the lists A,B,C,D after a 20 minute delay in order to ensure the information had passed into LTM.
Participant’s recall of list C was worse than their recall of list D. There was no difference between list A and list B.
He concluded that LTM is coded semantically. LTM organises information according to its meaning, so words with similar meaning can become confused.
Evaluation of Baddeley’s investigations into STM and LTM
Advantages
1) This study is a laboratory experiment and so it is easy to replicate as variables have been closely controlled. This means that reliability can be assessed.
Disadvantages:
1) The findings of this study have low ecological validity. The material (lists of unconnected words) which participants needed to recall was artificial (unlike the types of information which people need to recall in their everyday life) as was the laboratory setting.
Investigations into the capacity of the STM (Jacobs)
digit span test - He gave participants several sequences of digits or letters, asking them to repeat each sequence immediately after he had given it, in the correct order. The sequences got longer by one item each time.
Jacobs found that on average we can hold 9.3 digits and 7.3 letters.
Evaluation of Jacobs digit span test
Advantages
1) Jacob’s research was the first to acknowledge that STM capacity gradually improves with age.
2) - Although the validity of his study could be questions, given that his study was conducted so long ago and cannot be sure that extraneous variables were controlled as they would be today (for example, distractions and pps IQ levels whilst doing the study), the study has since been repeated and the same results found suggesting the study does have validity.
Disadvantages:
1) - Jacob’s research lacks ecological validity- learning random lists of numbers is not a realistic test of STM. More meaningful information may be recalled better e.g. learning playing card sequences, perhaps showing STM to have an even greater capacity.
2) previous sequences recalled by participants may have confused them on later trials so we don’t know if that factor became a confounding variable which affected how the capacity of the STM was measured.
Investigation into the capacity of the STM (Miller)
Miller reviewed psychological research studies and concluded that the span of STM is 7 (+/) 2.
If we try to recall more information than we have the capacity for then new incoming information displaces old information.
He also found that people can recall five words as easily as five letters, and so chunking (grouping large amounts of information into smaller groups) can help us remember more.
Evaluation of Millers investigation into the capacity of the STM
Disadvantages:
1) Cowan reviewed research and argued Miller may have overestimated the capacity of the STM. He conclude that the capacity of the STM was about 4 chunks (suggesting that the lower end of 7±2 items is more accurate)
Peterson and Peterson’s investigation into the duration of short term memory
1) Participants were presented with a nonsense trigram (3 random consonants)
2) Asked to count backwards in threes to stop them repeating/rehearsing the consonant trigram.
3) After intervals of either 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds, participants had to stop counting and repeat the trigram.
4) Repeated using different trigrams
Results: Participants could remember about 90% of trigrams after 3 seconds, 20% after 9 seconds, and 2% when there was 18 second interval.
Conclusion: Information decays (disappears) very quickly when you can’t rehearse it. The maximum STM duration is about 18 seconds.
Evaluation of Peterson and Peterson’s study
Advantages:
- Peterson and Peterson’s study is a lab experiment where variables can be tightly controlled for example, how many trigrams are presented. The procedure can also be replicated to test if results are reliable – for example the nonsense trigrams can be repeated on lots of participants over time and the duration of STM can be tested to see if it has changed over time (i.e. gone better or worse)
- the research has a high level of control, using standardised procedures to make sure all participants underwent the same process.
Disadvantages:
1) trigrams are unrealistic things to remember. It can therefore be said the experiment has low ecological validity (the findings may not apply to everyday life).
2) The trigrams presented on earlier trials may have caused confusion when participants came to remember trigrams in later trials (in other words, the earlier trigrams may have interfered with the later trigrams) so we are not sure whether the results gained from the participants were due to them forgetting the trigrams or being confused – this then may question how the duration of STM was tested.
- the finding of the study may have been caused by interference rather than STM having a short duration. It is possible that earlier learnt trigrams became confused with later ones
- Since Peterson and Peterson’s study more research into the STM duration has been carried out. The overall conclusion is that the STM maximum duration is between 18-30 seconds without rehearsal.
Investigation into the duration of long term memory (Bahrick et al’
tested 400 people of various ages on their memory of their classmates.
A photo recognition test consisted of participants being shown 50 photos and deciding if they belonged to their classmates or not.
In a free recall test participants were asked to list the names they could remember from their graduating class.
They found 90% accuracy at identifying faces of school friends within 15 years of leaving school. After 48 years this declined to 70%.
Free recall of names of classmates was 60% accurate within 15 years of leaving school, dropping to 30% after 48 years.
He concluded that the duration of LTM is potentially a lifetime but sometimes we have retrieval failure and need retrieval cues in order to access this information.
Evaluation of Bahrick et al investigation into the duration of long term memory
Advantages:
1) This was a natural experiment with meaningful material so has higher ecological validity than Peterson’s study which uses nonsense trigrams which are meaningless in the everyday world but remembering names is an everyday task so Bahrick’s study is relevant to everyday life
Disadvantages
1) It only looked at a very specific type of information- names of classmates. This type of information is particularly meaningful and regularly rehearsed. It could also be argued that not all LTMs remain for a lifetime
2) As Bahrick’s study is a natural experiment, it is harder to control for EVs e.g. if classmates were still in touch or had been talked about since, making results potentially invalid.
The multi store model of memory (Atkinson and Shiffrin)
It attempts to explain how information flows from one memory store to another.
There are three permanent structures in the memory system: the sensory register (SR), short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM).
Each of these memory stores differ in terms of their capacity, duration, coding and how information is lost from them.
The sensory register
Environmental stimuli received through the senses enters the SR, which is a short duration store retaining unprocessed impressions of information received through the senses.
It has a separate sensory store for each sensory input.
The capacity of the SR is unlimited but the duration is only 250 miliseconds.
A small fraction of the information received by the SR is attended to and selected for further processing in STM. If not attended to, sensory information is lost due to decay.
Short term memory
If information in the SR is attended to it is acoustically coded into STM.
STM is a temporary store for information received from the SR before it is transferred to LTM.
Information may be recalled at this point and then forgotten before it is transferred to LTM.
STM has a limited capacity of 7 (+/-2) pieces of information so information can be displaced by new incoming information.
STM has a duration of 18-30 seconds. This means that without rehearsal information will decay very quickly.
Information can be kept in STM by:
- maintenance rehearsal (repeatedly verbalising or thinking about the information). This is known as a rehearsal loop.
- elaborative rehearsal, (where information is organised in a meaningful way)
- the information may then be transferred to LTM for more permanent storage.
Long term memory
If information is sufficiently rehearsed in STM then it is semantically coded into LTM. This is a permanent store holding vast amounts of information for long periods of time.
The capacity of LTM is potentially infinite and there is no way of accurately measuring it. The duration of LTM could potentially be a lifetime.
When information in LTM is needed it is retrieved by STM and then recalled.
Sometimes we cannot access information from LTM because of retrieval failure and so we may need retrieval cues to help us access it.
Evaluation of the multi store memory model
Advantages:
- Neurobiological Evidence
1) Scoville attempted to treat a patient he referred to as HM’s epilepsy by removing several brain areas, including his hippocampus. This resulted in the patient being unable to code new long-term memories, although his short-term memory was unaffected. This supports the idea of separate and distinct STM and LTM.
Lab experiments:
1) + Murdock (1962) presented participants with a long list of words to be recalled in any order, this was referred to as the free recall experiment. Words at the beginning and the end of the lists were recalled better than those in the middle (serial position effect). Words at the beginning of the list are recalled because they have been constantly rehearsed and transferred to LTM (the primacy effect), while words at the end of the list are recalled because they are still in STM (the recency effect). This supports the idea of separate and distinct STM and LTM
Disadvantages:
Neurobiological evidence:
1) Shallice and Warrington reported the case study of KF who as a result of a motorbike accident had reduced STM capacity of only one or two digits, yet his LTM was normal. This supports the idea of a separate STM and LTM stores. However, KF had poor STM for verbal tasks but not visual tasks and this suggests that there is more than one type of STM, which contradicts the Multi-Store Model (MSM) of memory. Also, according to the MSM, LTM are retrieved by STM so if STM is damaged it should be difficult to retrieve LTM. However, KF was able to access LTM with out any difficulty.
1) The MSM is over simplified in assuming that there is only one type of STM and one type of LTM. Research studies indicate that there are several types of STM, such as one for verbal information (phonological loop) and another for non-verbal information (visuo-spatial sketchpad). Research also suggests that there are several types of LTM, we have episodic memory for life events, semantic memory for knowledge and facts and procedural memory for motor skills.
2) Baddeley and Hitch claimed that the MSM could not explain the ability to multi-task; if there is only one type of STM then multi-tasking would not be possible. However, this is not true
The working memory model (Baddeley and Hitch)
STM is an active store holding several pieces of information while they are being worked on
LTM is the passive store that only holds previously learned material to be used by STM when needed.
The central executive
drives the whole working memory system and allocates data to the other components, known as slave systems.
deals with cognitive tasks such as decision making, reasoning and problem solving.
Individuals have a limited attentional capacity, tasks that are automated make less attentional demands on the central executive and so leave us free to perform other tasks.
A person who has been driving 10 years will find that driving has become an automated task that does not make as many attentional demands
The phonological loop
deals with spoken and written material. It has two sub-components.
Phonological Store:
- sometimes referred to as the inner ear. It is linked to speech perception and holds information in speech-based form (i.e. spoken words) for 1-2 seconds.
Articulatory Loop
- sometimes referred to as the inner voice.
- linked to speech production and is used to rehearse and store verbal information from the phonological store. This allows for maintenance rehearsal.
The Visio spatial sketchpad
stores and processes information in a visual or spatial form. It is used for navigation.
sometimes referred to as the inner eye.
It has two sub-components.
- Visual Cache
The visual cache stores visual material about form and colour. - Inner Scribe
The inner scribe handles spatial relationships.
The Episodic Buffer
Baddeley added another component after as the model needed a general storage component to operate properly.
The slave systems only deal with processing and temporary storage of specific types of information, and the central executive has no storage capacity.
The episodic buffer is a limited capacity store, integrating information from the central executive, the phonological loop and the visuo-spatial sketchpad, as well as from LTM.