Attachment Flashcards
Developmental psychology definition
A branch of psychology concerned with the progressive behavioural changes that occur in individuals across their lifespan
Attachment definition
An emotional bond between two people.
It is a two-way process that endures over time
Reciprocity definition
Also referred to as turn-taking.
It is a two-way, mutual process, where each party responds to the other’s signals to sustain interaction.
The behaviour of each party elicits a response from the other.
Studies have demonstrated that infants coordinate their actions with their caregiver’s actions in a kind of conversation (Jaffe et al., 1973). The regularity of an infant’s signals allows a caregiver to anticipate the infant’s behaviour and respond appropriately. This sensitivity to infant behaviour lays the foundation for later attachment between the caregiver and the infant
Interactional synchrony definition
when adults and babies respond in time to sustain communication.
The caregiver and the infant interact in such a way that their actions and emotions mirror each other.
Meltzoff and Moore found that infants as young as two or three weeks old imitated specific facial and hand gestures that they saw adults do. An adult model displayed one of three facial expressions or hand movements. A dummy was placed in the baby’s mouth during the display to prevent any response. Following the display the dummy was removed and the infant’s expression was filmed. They found that there was an association between the infant’s behaviour and the adult model
Evaluation of caregiver and infant interactions
Advantages:
1) Interactional synchrony has been demonstrated in several studies. Meltzoff and Moore found that infants as young as three days old were displaying this behaviour, which seems to suggest that the imitation behaviours are not learned and are innate.
2) Murray and Trevarthen got mothers to interact with their babies over a video monitor. In the next part of the study the babies were played a tape of their mother so she was not responding to them. The babies tried to attract their mother’s attention but when this failed they gave up responding. This shows that babies want their mothers to reciprocate.
3) Abravanal and DeYong observed infant behaviour when interacting with a puppet that looked like a human mouth opening and closing. Infant’s made little response to this, which shows they are not just imitating what they see; interactional synchronyis a specific social response
Disadvantages:
1) Babies cannot communicate so psychologists are relying on their inferences.They cannot be sure that infants are actually trying to communicate.
2) The expressions tested (tongue sticking out, yawning, and smiling) are ones that infants frequently make so they may not have been deliberately imitating what they saw
Difficulties investigating caregiver infant interactions
1) Studies have found that babies’ attachment behaviours are much stronger in laboratory settings than they are in their home environment. Therefore,studies should take place in a natural setting to increase validity.
2) Most studies into caregiver-infant interactions are observational so there may babies in the observer’s interpretation of what they see (observer bias). This can be countered by using more than one observer (inter-rater reliability).
3) There are practical issues when investigating caregiver-infant interactions. Infants are often asleep or feeding when psychologists want to observe them. Researchers need to use fewer but shorter observation periods because ofbabieslimited waking periods.
4) Extra care needs to be taken is relation to ethics when investigating caregiver-infant interactions so as not to affect the child or parent in any way e.g.protection from harm, confidentiality etc
Stages of attachment investigation study (Schaffer and Emerson)
investigated the development of attachment in infants using a longitudinal study where they followed 60 infants and their mothers for two years
What are the 4 stages in the development of attachment in infants
Pre - attachment (0-3 months)
Indiscriminate attachment (3-7 months)
Discriminate attachment (7 months onwards)
Multiple attachment (7 months onwards)
Pre attachment definition
From six weeks of age infants become attracted to other humans, preferring them to objects and events. This preference is demonstrated by their smiling at people’s faces
Indiscriminate attachment
Infants begin to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar people, smiling more at people they know. They will still allow strangers to handle them.
Discriminate attachment
Infants develop a specific attachment to their primary attachment figure (usually the mother) staying close to that person.
They show separation protest - the distress an infant shows when their primary attachment figure leaves them
They display stranger anxiety - the distress an infant shows when approached by someone they do not know
Schaffer and Emerson (1964) noticed that the infant’s primary attachment figure was not always the person who spends the most time with the child. They concluded that it is the quality of the relationship, not quantity that matters the most in the formation of an attachment
Multiple attachments
Very soon after developing their first attachment infants develop strong emotional ties with other major caregivers, such asthe father and grandparents, and non-caregivers, such as siblings These are called secondary attachments.
The fear of strangers weakens but their attachment to their primary attachment figure remains the strongest.
Evaluation of the stages of attachment
Disadvantages
1) The data collected by Shaffer and Emerson may be unreliable because it was based on mothers’ reports of their infants. Some mothers might have been less sensitive to their infant’s protests and therefore been less likely to report them
2) The sample was biased because it only included infants from a working-class population and thus the findings might not apply to other social groups
3) The sample was also biased because it only included infants from individualist cultures, infants from collectivist cultures could form attachments in a different way
4) The study does not have temporal validity, it was conducted in the 1960s and parental care of children has changed considerably since then. More women go out to work and more men stay at home
5) Stage theories such as this one are inflexible and do not take account of individual differences, some infants might form multiple attachment first, rather than starting with a single attachment
The role of the father
There is inconsistency in the research into the role of the father and whether he plays a distinct role.
Some research shows that fathers provide play and stimulation to complement the role of the mother (providing emotional support), and that both are crucial to a child’s wellbeing.
However, other research shows no such distinction. Research investigating the effects of growing up in a single female or same-sex parent family shows there is no effect on development, and suggests the role of the father is not important.
Shaffer and Emerson found that fathers were far less likely to be the primary attachment figure than mothers. This may be because they spend less time with their infants. It is also possible that most men are not as psychologically equipped to form an intense attachment because they lack the emotional sensitivity that women have. This could be due to biological factors. The female hormone oxytocin underlies caring behaviour so women are more orientated to interpersonal goals than men. Alternatively, it could be due to societal norms. In some cultures there is also the stereotype that it is feminine to be sensitive to the needs of others.
Nevertheless men form attachments with their children. Shaffer and Emerson (1964) found that 75% of infants studied had formed an attachment with their father at 18 months. Fathers can even be their primary attachment figure (Field, 1978). The role of the father in a single-parent family is more likely to adopt the traditional maternal role, to be the primary caregiver and a nurturing attachment figure.
Investigation into types of attachment (The strange situation - Ainsworth et al)
A controlled observation which took place in a room that had been furnished with some toys.
The investigators observed the infants in a series of three-minute episodes:
- mother and baby,
- stranger enters,
- mother leaves,
- mother returns, etc.
They recorded an infant’s proximity seeking, stranger anxiety, separation protest and reunion joy.
Findings of the strange situation: Type A - insecure avoidant
20% of babies had attachments that were classified as insecure-avoidant.
Babies will:
- largely ignore their caregiver and play independently while they explore the room.
- show no signs of distress when the caregiver is absent (no separation protest)
- continue to ignore them when they return (no reunion joy).
The baby is distressed when left completely alone but is comforted by the stranger as easily as their caregiver (no stranger anxiety).
The caregiver and the stranger are treated in much the same way.
Findings of the strange situation: Type B - secure attachment
70% of babies were described as securely attached.
They:
- play happily while the caregiver is present and use them as a safe base while they explore the room and play with the toys.
- are clearly distressed when the caregiver leaves (separation protest), even if they are not left completely alone
- seeks immediate contact with their caregiver when they return (reunion joy). Their caregiver easily comforts them.
They are wary of the stranger (stranger anxiety) but accepts some comfort from them when the caregiver is absent.
Findings of the strange situation: Type C - insecure resistant
10% of babies were put in the insecure-resistant category.
They:
- are fussy and cry more than other babies.
- will not explore the room or play with the toys very much, instead they are clingy.
- The baby is distressed when the caregiver leaves (extreme separation protest)
- they resist comfort from the caregiver on reunion (no reunion joy).
- strongly resist the stranger’s attempts to make contact (extreme stranger anxiety).
Evaluation of the strange situation
Advantages
1) It has been replicated many times over the years. It is easy to replicate this study because it had a high level of control and standardised procedures. It has been carried out successfully in many different cultures.
Disadvantages:
1) This methodology was developed in the United States and so may be culturally biased. Attachment behaviour that is seen as healthy in the United States may not be seen as such in all cultures. In Germany at this time very few mothers worked (less than 1 in 5) but children were encouraged to be independent and self-reliant. German parents view some of the behaviour exhibited by securely attached infants, such as crying when their mothers leave the room, as being spoilt and so do not reward this behaviour. This is why these children may have shown less anxiety when separated from their mothers and been classed as avoidant.
2) The validity of some measures has been questioned. E.g it could be argued that proximity seeking could be a measure of insecurity rather than security.
3) The study is gender biased as it has only ever been carried out using mothers as the caregiver. Children might be insecurely attached to their mothers but securely attached to their fathers. The study is not measuring a child’s overall attachment style but their attachment to one individual. Main and Weston found that children behave differently depending on which parent they are with.
4) The study is artificial so it may not reflect the infant’s real world behaviour (lacks ecological validity). Studies have found that babies’ attachment behaviours are much stronger in laboratory settings than they are in their home environment.
Investigation into cross cultural variation in attachment (Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg)
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg conducted a meta-analysis of 32 studies into attachment to see if attachment occurs in the same way across all cultures.
All of the studies they included had used the strange situation to measure attachment. These studies looked at the relationships between mothers and their babies, all of whom were under 24 months of age. The studies were conducted in eight countries, some individualistic cultures (USA, UK, and Germany) and some collectivist cultures (Japan, China, and Israel).
Findings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s investigation into cross cultural variations in attachment
- secure attachment was the most common attachment style in all of the eight countries studied.
- the second most common attachment style was insecure-avoidant, except in Israel and Japan where avoidant was rare but resistant was common.
- the lowest percentage of secure attachments was in China.
- the highest percentage of secure attachments was in Great Britain.
- the highest percentage of insecure-avoidant attachments was in West Germany.
- overall variations within cultures were 1.5 times greater than the variation between cultures.
The similarities between cultures suggest that caregiver and infant interactions have universal characteristics and so may be partly instinctive. However, the variations between cultures show that the cultural differences in child rearing practices also play an important role in attachment styles. The variations within cultures indicate that sub-cultural differences, such as social class, play an important role in an infant’s attachment style. These factors are possibly more important than culture.
Evaluation of cultural variation in attachment
Advantages:
1) This study is a meta-analysis, which includes a very large sample. This increases the validity of the findings.
Disadvantages
1) The strange situation methodology was developed in the United States and it may not be valid in other cultures. E.g Ainsworth assumed that a willingness to explore means a child is securely attached but this may not be the case in other cultures meaning that the methodology is culturally biased.
2) The infants from Israel in this study lived on a Kibbutz (closed community) and did not come into contact with strangers. This could be the reason why these children showed severe distress when confronted with strangers and so were classed as resistant.
3) This study was not actually comparing cultures but countries. For instance, they compared the USA with Japan. Both of these countries have many different sub-cultures and that have different child rearing practices. One study of attachment in Tokyo found similar attachment style distributions to the USA, whereas studies in more rural areas of Japan found many more insecure-resistant infants.
4) All of the studies used in this meta-analysis looked at infants’ attachments to their mothers. Children might be insecurely attached to their mothers but securely attached to their fathers. They strange situation is therefore not measuring a child’s attachment style but their attachment to one individual. Main and Weston found that children behave differently depending on which parent they are with.