Approaches Flashcards
The definition of psychology
The scientific study of the human mind and its functions, especially affecting behaviours in a given context
The definition of science
.a means of acquiring knowledge through systematic and objective investigation. The aim is to discover laws.
Wilhelm Wundt – Introspection – Psychology emerging as a science: AO1
Wundt was the first person to call himself a, “psychologist” and he is known as the, “father of psychology” whereby his ideas stem from philosophical roots
In 1879, Wundt opened the first experimental psychological laboratory in Leipzig, Germany, which helped to shape Psychology as a science. The laboratory was designated to the aid the scientific study of psychological inquiry using controlled conditions that could facilitate replication of results.
Wilhelm Wundt - introspection
Wundt devised, “Introspection” as a way of studying internal mental events.
Introspection is “The first systematic and experimental attempt to study mental processes by breaking down conscious awareness into basic structures of reflections, thoughts, images and sensations.”
Wundt wanted to focus on the psychological processes of perception and structuralism. Structuralism is a theory of consciousness developed by Wundt. It involves the use of introspection, self-reports of feelings
He wanted to document and describe the structure of human consciousness (introspection) and this involved him and his workers recording their own conscious thoughts and breaking them down into sensations, emotions, reactions etc.
Wundt wanted to investigate psychology in much the same way as the traditional sciences, as he believed Psychology should emerge as a science
Wundt used scientific methods to investigate introspection, and this paved the way for Psychology to be seen as a science and helped develop cognitive psychology
Introspection was recorded under controlled conditions in a laboratory using the same stimuli, the same reaction times and the same instructions given to participants, and they had to focus on present experiences
Introspection involves the person saying everything that is going through their mind whilst they are doing an activity. They must keep talking even if their ideas are not clear. This made the research into introspection highly reliable so that replication would be possible
This process marked Psychology as very separate from its early philosophical roots
Wundt recognised later on that mental processes were difficult to study using introspection, and this encouraged a search for alternative methods.
An evaluation of Introspection and the emergence of Psychology as a science: AO3
Advantages:
1) Introspection has the advantage that it has helped to develop other approaches in psychology (such as behaviourism via Watson and the cognitive approach by Beck).
2) Introspection has the advantage of being extremely scientific. It shares the same qualities as the scientific subjects of Chemistry, Biology and Physics - all of these subjects make predictions from hypotheses. There is a high level of control of variables as all of these subjects study behaviour in a laboratory setting
3) Introspection has the advantage of being able to establish what causes behaviour. If we know what causes behaviour to occur, then we can predict future behaviour.
4) Introspection has the advantage that it is still used today in areas of therapy that study emotional states. E.g introspection can be used in cognitive therapy in order to try to get patients to alter their negative thinking and turn them into positive thoughts. Therefore introspection can still be applied to contemporary therapy used in modern society
5) Wundt supports and advocates the idea of reductionism. He believed consciousness could be broken down to its basic elements without sacrificing any of the properties of the whole. He studied internal mental processes by deconstructing them down into measurable units such as perception, senses and experiences.
Disadvantages
1) Watson criticised Wundt’s idea of introspection and whether psychology was emerging as a science. Introspection produces subjective data which varies from one individual to the next, and therefore introspection is not objective or reliable.
2) Introspection has been criticised because it is not very scientific or accurate. Wilson claims that psychologists have little knowledge about some behaviour and attitudes that might exist outside of conscious awareness (e.g. racism). Introspection would not be able to uncover and help us understand these thought processes
3) Introspection can be criticised because it fails to explain HOW the mind works and the processes involved in thinking about a particular topic/doing an activity. Psychologists cannot see how thoughts are generated and introspection cannot be properly observed
Definition of the behavioural approach
A way of explaining behaviour in terms of what is observed in terms of learning
The behavioural approach assumptions: AO1
- emerged at the beginning of the 20th century
- was the driving force in the development of psychology as a science
- focussed on behaviour being measured and observed
- all behaviour is learnt and involves the same process for animals and humans - classical/operant conditioning
- maintains more control and objectivity within research and relies on lab experiments
What is classical conditioning
Learning by association
A neutral stimulus is repeatedly paired with an unconditioned stimulus. The neutral stimulus will eventually produce the same response that was produced by the unconditioned response alone
Classical Conditioning: The work of Ivan Pavlov (summary) (1904) (AO1)
Dogs can be conditioned to salivate to the sound of a bell, if the sound of a bell is repeatedly presented at the same time as food is presented. Both of these stimuli would be paired together causing a learning response, so that the dog would learn to associate the sound of the bell with food and then salivate. At the end of the conditioning process, the dog will learn to salivate when they hear the sound of the bell
Classical Conditioning: The work of Ivan Pavlov (process) (1904) (AO1)
Before classical conditioning:
Food (unconditioned stimulus) produces the unconditioned response of the dog salivating
A bell (neutral stimulus) is rung (presented alone, without the presence of food). The dog does not salivate (no conditioned response is observed)
During classical conditioning:
The unconditioned stimulus (food) is repeatedly paired with the neutral stimulus (the bell ringing) to produce salivation (unconditioned response).
After conditioning:
We can then present the bell alone (conditioned stimulus) and the dog will then begin to salivate (conditioned response). Learning has taken place via classical conditioning and an association has been established between the bell being rung and the dog salivating
principles of classical conditioning in relation to Pavlov’s research:
1) Generalisation:
Stimuli similar to the original conditioned stimuli (bell) will cause the conditioned response (salivation) e.g. a bell with a different pitch
2) Discrimination:
Stimuli similar to the original conditioned stimuli (bell) will not produce the conditioned response (salivation). This can be done by withholding the unconditioned stimulus (food). E.g a similar sounding bell is rung but food is not presented at the same time, so salivation doesn’t occur
3) Extinction:
The conditioned response (salivation) is not produced because of the bell being rung. This occurs when the conditioned stimulus (bell) is presented without the unconditioned stimulus of food
Evaluation of classical conditioning: AO3
Advantages
1) A strength of the behavioural model is that it can be easily tested and measured in a scientific way by using observations in a laboratory. The behavioural model relies on observing behaviour that can be directly seen and measured in a highly controlled setting. This helps aid objectivity and replication
2) A strength of Pavlov’s research is that it has helped apply classical conditioning to treatments of psychological disorders. E.g classical conditioning has helped form treatments such as flooding and systematic desensitisation.
Disadvantages
1) Classical conditioning is successful in explaining how learning can occur in animals and young children. However it is not very strong in explaining how adults learn new behaviours.
2) Menzies criticises the behavioural model and the idea of classical conditioning. He studied people that had hydrophobia, and he found that only 2% of his sample had encountered a negative experience with water (due to classical conditioning). Therefore, 98% of his sample had a phobia of water but had never had a negative experience involving water.
3) The behaviourial model can be criticised because it views humans and animals as passive recipients who have machine like responses to stimuli in the environment. Animals and humans can easily learn new behaviours and have little or no conscious thought at all. This minimises their free will.
4) The behavioural model would be criticised by the biological approach. The behavioural model would ignore the role of genes, hormones, evolution and neural mechanisms that are responsible for behaviour. There is very strong research evidence from psychologists that behaviour is determined by genes. Therefore other models in psychology should also be considered when looking at how behaviours develop
5) A disadvantage of classical conditioning is that is can be viewed as being deterministic because it ignores the role of free will in people’s behavioural responses. Classical conditioning anticipates an individual will respond to a conditioned stimulus with no variation, which is not accurate. People have control over how they might respond to an association between two stimuli. This can lead to explanations for behaviour that are incomplete and inconsistent.
Definition of operant conditioning
A form of learning in which behaviour is shaped and maintained by consequences. The consequences include punishment and positive/negative reinforcement
Definition of positive reinforcement
receiving something positive when carrying out a behaviour, encouraging you to carry out that behaviour in the future
Definition of negative reinforcement
performing a behaviour in order to avoid something unpleasant, so the behaviour continues in the future
Definition of punishment
an unpleasant consequence caused by certain behaviours.
Operant Conditioning: The work of Skinner (1953) AO1
This method of learning focuses on behaviour producing consequences such as punishment, positive reinforcement or negative reinforcement
Skinner conducted research on pigeons and rats in “The Skinner box”. The Skinner box was a cage which has a lever and a floor which could be electrified.
One hungry rat would be placed in the skinner box and would be allowed to run round. The rat might accidentally press the lever and the rat would be rewarded by a food pellet which would drop into the skinner box (positive reinforcement). The rat would continue to press the lever in order to receive a food pellet in the future, and the rat soon learns that pressing the lever leads to a reward
The rat could also learn that by pressing the lever they could avoid something unpleasant - by pressing the lever the rat could avoid receiving an electric shock (conducted via the floor). This is an example of negative reinforcement
What is extinction (skinner’s box)
Extinction - when the rat presses the lever but no longer receives a reward (food pellet), it soon learns that pressing the lever leads to no rewards. The rat will therefore stop pressing the lever as it has learnt that it leads to no more rewards.
What is spontaneous recovery (skinner’s box)
Spontaneous recovery - Following extinction, if the rat presses the lever and receives a food pellet, it will learn that pressing the lever results in a food pellet. The rat will learn this link very quickly and “spontaneously recover” what he had previously learned
What are schedules of reinforcement (skinner’s box)
Schedules of reinforcement - there are different methods of reinforcement that might occur: some examples include:
Continuous reinforcement - Every time the rat presses the lever they will always receive a food pellet
Fixed Interval - The rat presses the lever and only receives a food pellet during a fixed time only, e.g. every 30 seconds
Fixed ratio: The rat must press the lever for a fixed number of times and then it will receive the food pellet
Evaluation of operant conditioning: AO3
Advantages
1) There is research evidence to support the idea of operant conditioning in the real world. Token economy is used in institutions such as prisons and hospitals and acts as a form of behaviour modification. Token economy works by rewarding appropriate behaviour with tokens which can be exchanged for privileges. Research conducted by Paul and Lentz used token economy to treat patients who had schizophrenia, and it was found that their behaviour became more appropriate.
2) A strength of the research conducted by Skinner using the Skinner box is that he relied on the experimental method. He used highly controlled conditions to discover the relationship between variables so that he could establish a cause and effect relationship,
3) The research by Skinner is on the nurture side of the nature/nurture debate. This would state that learning occurs due to environmental factors and external stimuli rather than due to nature and biology. Therefore by manipulating factors in the environment this can have an effect on learning and behaviour, and is supported by nurture
Disadvantages
1) Skinner’s research involving the Skinner box can be criticised. Skinner ignores the concept of free will. He suggests that past experiences involving operant conditioning will affect future behaviour, and people/animals have no control over their actions or the behaviours they show. This is a deterministic view of behaviour which does not account for free will and the fact that a human/animal has a choice over how they behave.
2) The Skinner box has been criticised in terms of ethical issues. Rats and pigeons were often placed in the Skinner box in stressful and aversive conditions which could have a negative effect upon the psychological and physical health of the animals. There is also the issue about generalising the results gained from rats and pigeons to humans. Animals are very different to humans, and therefore the results that Skinner gained from his experiments might not be applicable to humans
3) Operant conditioning is rooted in the behaviourist approach in Psychology and would ignore the biological approach. The biological approach would argue against the behavioural approach and would state that behaviour cannot be learnt, but instead behaviour is heavily influenced by the role of genes, hormones and biochemical/neural mechanisms. Therefore other approaches in psychology must also be considered when examining the influences upon behaviour, and operant conditioning/learning cannot explain all behaviours.
What is social learning?
New patterns of behaviour can be learnt by observing the behaviour of others
AO1: Social Learning Theory by Bandura (1977)
1) Modelling:
Social learning requires a person to carry out the behaviour, so that the observer can learn the behaviour. The model can be live or it could be symbolic e.g a TV character. Models provide examples of behaviour which can be learned by imitation.
2) Imitation:
Children learn behaviours via imitation that are modelled by others and this process tends to be faster than using classical or operant conditioning. Key characteristics of successful imitation includes the factors of
A) The characteristics of the model (age, gender etc)
B) The observers perceived ability to perform the behaviour shown
C) The observed consequence of behaviour (positive or negative)
3) Identification:
This is the extent to which the observer relates to the model and feels that he/she is similar to them so that they could experience the same outcomes as the model. The person would aim to be like the model as much as they could.
4) Vicarious reinforcement:
Children who observed a model who got rewarded for showing aggressive behaviour were more likely to imitate the aggressive behaviour as compared to children who observed a model being punished for showing aggressive behaviour.
This is vicarious reinforcement and shows that individuals do not need to experience rewards or punishment directly in order to learn new behaviours. They can observe the consequences of behaviours by observing a model, and if rewards are given to the model, then children are more likely to imitate the behaviour shown.
Mediational processes: (cognition)
Social learning places importance on internal cognitive mediational processes. The observer must form a mental representation of the behaviour being displayed by the model and the likely consequences of the behaviour in terms of expectancies. The observer might display the learned behaviour, provided there is the expectation that positive consequences are more likely to occur than negative consequences.
Mediational processes involve the following points:
A) Attention – The observer must pay attention and notice the behaviour of the model
B) Retention – The observer must remember the behaviour of the model
C) Motor reproduction – The observer must be able to perform the behaviour
D) Motivation – The observer must be willing to perform the behaviour in light of rewards
An evaluation of Social Learning Theory by Bandura: AO3
Advantages
1) It has provided great understanding of how criminal behaviour is learnt. Akers found that criminals seem to engage in more criminal behaviour when they are exposed to a model that they can highly identify with.
2) A strength of Social learning theory is that it is more effective when the model is very similar to the observer. If the observer is similar to the model, it makes it easier for the observer to visualise themselves in the place of the model and feel like they are having the same experience. Fox found evidence to suggest that when an observer played a computer game that had a model that looked very similar to themselves, they were more likely to engage in the same behaviours as the model
3) Social learning theory is good because it gives a more comprehensive view of human learning when compared to operant and classical conditioning. Social learning theory recognises the importance of both behavioural and cognitive factors (meditational processes) when examining how people learn new behaviours.
Disadvantages
1) Social learning theory can be criticised because it does not take into account cause and effect. e.g research has found that increased associations with peers can increase the likelihood of delinquent behaviour in young people through learning poor behaviour. However, we cannot assume that delinquency is caused by social learning theory alone. Other factors could cause delinquency such as deviant and poor attitudes that the person has held before
2) Social learning theory can be criticised because it ignores other potential influences on behaviour. For example Social learning theory would ignore the role of biology or genetics which could cause people to behave in certain ways. For example Bandura found in his experiment that boys were more aggressive than girls, regardless of the experimental situation they were in
3) The Social learning theory can be criticised because it sees behaviour as being determined by the environment rather than being caused by other factors such as genetics or innate behaviour. This can pose a criticism because genetics is a very big factor that can determine human behaviour, and the social learning theory ignores this factor.
Bandura’s study on Social Learning Theory – The bobo doll experiment (1961): AO1:
Bandura conducted an observational study involving 36 male and 36 female children aged 37-69 months of age
The children had to observe either an aggressive/non aggressive female/male model who was interacting with a bobo doll.
In one condition the aggressive model displayed aggressive acts towards the bobo doll such as striking it with a mallet and shouting verbally aggressive words such as, “POW!”
After the children observed these aggressive acts, they were made to feel frustrated. They were shown attractive toys but told they were not allowed to play with them
The children (one by one) were then taken to a room which had some toys including a bobo doll (other toys include a mallet, a dart gun and some non aggressive toys too). The children were observed for 20 minutes
The results found that the children who observed the aggressive model reproduced the same aggressive behaviour towards the bobo doll, whereas the children who observed the non aggressive model, showed no aggression to the bobo doll.
33% of children who observed and heard verbal aggression repeated what they had seen and heard, “POW!” However 0% of children in the non aggressive group displayed verbal aggression
In a follow up study, children observed a model being rewarded for their aggressive behaviour, and this increased the likelihood that the children would also be aggressive towards the bobo doll.
Boys seem to more aggressive than girls, and imitation of aggression was greatest when the model was the same gender as the observer.
Evaluation of Bandura’s Bobo doll experiment on Social Learning Theory: AO3
Advantages
1) Conducting research in a laboratory setting has the advantage that the study is highly controlled to ensure that the independent variable does have an effect on the dependent variable. It also ensures that the study is highly reliable and the results are likely to be replicated in the future
2) The research conducted by Bandura has the advantage of providing evidence that social learning theory is a powerful way for children to learn new behaviours (positive and negative ones). This has the implication that we should be very aware of the role of media on young children as they might be very easily influenced by what they see on TV etc. and might imitate negative/aggressive behaviours.
Disadvantages
1) Conducting research in a laboratory setting has the disadvantage that the results gained about social learning might not be able to be generalised to the wider population and might lack ecological validity. Also, observational research has the limitation that participants might show demand characteristics and guess the aim of the study and distort their behaviour giving invalid results about social learning theory
2) The use of a bobo doll in Bandura’s experiment has been criticised. The bobo doll is quite unique, and it is meant to be hit and thrown about because it “bounces back” into the same position. Critics have stated that a bobo doll is meant to be played with in an aggressive manner and therefore the results gained from Bandura’s study do not tell us much about social learning behaviour. Maybe the bobo doll should have been replaced with another toy such as a teddy bear.
3) The study by Bandura has been criticised because the bobo doll experiment is only examining the short term effects of social learning that are occurring within the experiment itself. We do not know whether the children left the experiment and behaved aggressively in the future (due to social learning theory), so therefore we do not know how powerful and influential social learning theory is as a method of learning.
4) Ethical issues can be a problem in this study. The children need to be protected from psychological harm in the fact they are being taught to be more aggressive. If they behave aggressively in real life this could lead to negative consequences and punishment. There is also the issue of physical harm whereby the children might wish to inflict harm on others because they have seen a model perform the same behaviours. All of the children should have been debriefed after the study to ensure that they were told the true aim, purpose and implications of social learning theory
Key features of the cognitive approach:
Cognitive psychologists focus on attention, memory and how people perceive, store, manipulate and interpret information
The information processing model:
Information is received through the senses and is processed by the brain.
The mind is like a computer